Hi pol I just converted from islam to christendom

Hi pol I just converted from islam to christendom

What can I expect in the future?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/oFbnC_2OOJE?t=8m
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3509367/Muslim-shopkeeper-stabbed-death-hours-posted-happy-Easter-message.html
biblebelievers.org.au/moongod.htm
biblebelievers.org.au/islam.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allah
biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah 46&version=KJVhttp://biblehub.com/commentaries/isaiah/46-1.htm
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-refuting_idea#Verification-_and_falsification-principles
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Nothing. You are still one god away from the truth.

Slaughter by Muslims

It's time to LARP as crusader. Deus Vult!

Crusades and tasty bacon. Good choice friend.

>christendom
the cuckshed

What type mah man?

pic related

Also epic music
youtu.be/oFbnC_2OOJE?t=8m

Takfir!

>Wut to expect
Same shit, different book of lies..

>Muh science is the absolute truth

Whimat kind of christian are you now, Catholic, Orthodox, Anglican, etc.?

>"Science isn't true!"
>Believes 2000 year old book written by mystery authors that says the earth is flat is the guide to the universe

6 million keks

*what

Science is only meant to provide falsifiable theories. It has nothing to do with truth

Truth doesn't keep becoming false after a few years

If you destroyed every religion today. Religion would come back but with different stories
If you destroyed every bit of scientific knowledge today, it would also come back but with the same story.

>If you destroyed every bit of scientific knowledge today, it would also come back but with the same story.

That doesn't make scientific knowledge true in the slightest. Only more intuitive than most religions

what can you expect in the future? DEATH

I came here to post this.

Keep it secret from your fellow quintessentially British neighbors. Stay with Christ.

smashing isis and the degenerates.

TBAG
B
A
G

We shall retake Turkey Israel and many other lands and return peace and freedom to self determination and representation.

>kind of the opposite of you know enslave everything.

No, its not intuition, it called reproducible results. When you drop a ball off a table and it hits the ground, the next time you do it it will also hit the ground. No story can be made up to change that fact.

pic related would like to have a word with you about building 7

Read your Bible. Don't expect to be loved by others. Pray very often. Build your faith and don't let any of the inane comments here or elsewhere to cause you to stumble. Research to counter this. Welcome to the Kingdom of God.

What a retarded cartoon.. You know "Allah" is just the arabic word for "God" right? So the cartoon basically says "God is a false God"

Hell I'm an Atheist and I know better than that.

>When you drop a ball off a table and it hits the ground, the next time you do it it will also hit the ground. No story can be made up to change that fact.

It's not an inductive fact. It's an empirical presumption

Great things, believe me

When we say God we mean the Holy Trinity. They most certainly do not

Give this Goy a shekel

>this is how little atheists know about islam.

to be killed.

>Abdul is "created" by god as a muslim, in that he was born into an Islamic family
>God created Abdul to be burned for eternity, yet Abdul must burn forever for this unless he begs on his knees
The mental gymnastics required for this worldview are impressive.

>gravity is an empirical presumption
wow.. just wow.

probably getting murdered or driven away from your home by islamists in the next 10 or so years, since your in Great Kaliphate

>people are created muslim

whore pls

How did your family and relatives react?

The idea that gravity will always happen in exactly the same way everywhere throughout the universe, is not an inductive fact

It's a presupposition

You're an apostate scumbag and you will never be accepted by them, they will always look at you as racially inferior, fool.

>When we say God
Except who is we, there are several christian sects that do not believe the same.
>Well not THEM, they don't count
Thus goes back to the point. With religion, truth is a matter of opinion.
Dude, the word in Arabic literally translates to "God" in english. Sound "Gud" to you?

Crusade fucking when? These animals don't even let regular guy muslims be regular guys, this is horseshit

Eternal life, happiness, and a true meaning to life. Also what type of Christianity did you convert to by the way?

Depends how broad your definition of Christian is. In my eyes, you are not Christian if you deny the Trinity

You're either a Messianic Jew, or a Muslim, or something entirely else

Stabbed in the head as well..

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3509367/Muslim-shopkeeper-stabbed-death-hours-posted-happy-Easter-message.html

Actually you are correct, gravity is a theory in how it works. However its not a theory in how it exists, so poor example on my part. But that's also the beauty of science. As things are proven to be different or wrong, science will adapt to it and embrace it. Take F=ma which is nearly always true, however once intrinsic velocity dependence was discovered, that F is actually relative to velocity near the speed of light, the law was adapted by Einstein in 1905

>whimat

jesus christ Italybruh, you couldnt of fucked that up harder if you tried

no, it translates to "the God" you dumb fuck

considering where you re from,i d say getting beheaded isnt out of the question

>As things are proven to be different or wrong, science will adapt to it and embrace it.
>Take F=ma which is nearly always true

"Nearly always true" doesn't cut it. As long as there's a chance it could be proven wrong, it will eventually be superseded

Science is a never-ending quest of proving yourself wrong

>he tries again
Allah is an ancient arabic deity from the arabian pantheon pre muhammad, it became synonymous with deity in arabic, this is why christian arabs erroneously used allah aswell which is NOT the god of the bible. Allah was originally before muhammad worshipped with 3 exhalted cranes/birds who carried the prayers to allah, alat al uzza and manat.. Muhammad changed this and made it a singular deity. This god is even more ancient and basically what it boils down to, it refers to the fallen cherub of the bible mentioned in ezekiel 28 isaiah 14

suen/sin the moon god bel. (the god of the the lesser light)
biblebelievers.org.au/moongod.htm
biblebelievers.org.au/islam.htm

>abdul is created by god as a muslim, in that he was born into an islamic family.
God seeded man and man decided to go worship a fallen angel, and you pretend god wanted that.

No what is amazing is the mental gymnastics required to strawman so hard whilst being so smug that you actually convince yourself that your point is valid.

Traded shit for a turd, well done.

Watch your back, there is other Muslims around you. Always carry a kit to clean acid.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allah

>Regional variants of the word Allah occur in both pagan and Christian pre-Islamic inscriptions.[8][21] Different theories have been proposed regarding the role of Allah in pre-Islamic polytheistic cults. Some authors have suggested that polytheistic Arabs used the name as a reference to a creator god or a supreme deity of their pantheon.[22][23] The term may have been vague in the Meccan religion.[22][24] According to one hypothesis, which goes back to Julius Wellhausen, Allah (the supreme deity of the tribal federation around Quraysh) was a designation that consecrated the superiority of Hubal (the supreme deity of Quraysh) over the other gods.[8] However, there is also evidence that Allah and Hubal were two distinct deities.[8] According to that hypothesis, the Kaaba was first consecrated to a supreme deity named Allah and then hosted the pantheon of Quraysh after their conquest of Mecca, about a century before the time of Muhammad.[8] Some inscriptions seem to indicate the use of Allah as a name of a polytheist deity centuries earlier, but we know nothing precise about this use.[8] Some scholars have suggested that Allah may have represented a remote creator god who was gradually eclipsed by more particularized local deities.[25][26] There is disagreement on whether Allah played a major role in the Meccan religious cult.[25][27] No iconic representation of Allah is known to have existed.[27][28] Muhammad's father's name was ʿAbd-Allāh meaning "the slave of Allāh".[24]

tl;dr Allah referred to a specific god in the Arab pantheon prior to Islam.

Arabic is a fun language, but don't get wrapped around the axle. Yes madrassa just means school in Arabic, but in English it usually means a radical Islamic school. Words can have multiple meanings and are often influenced by their origins.

>tfw Jewpedia hasn't censored this yet.

Well I got some bad news. According to sharia the punishment for apostasy is death.

As a uk you are likely to be fucked so maybe consider either converting back to a mudslim or be ready for whatever happens. The uk is moving more towards fully and forcefully instituting and/or allowing more sharia to be enforced.

TLDR: You're fucked.

>Science is a never-ending quest of proving yourself wrong

It should be, but it often gets corrupted by Black Science Man types who have little aptitude in science and no perspective outside of science.

If you agree that science is built purely on falsifiability, then you must realise it can never hold unto truth

>you're fucked be scared
Oh yeah nice intimidation attempt.
He probably already knows that dumbass..

But sharia law is not in effect in europe yet, also apostates from islam are some pretty tough cookies, because they know what the consequences are. So they are very helpful and kind, like if someone takes the zealotry of islam and follow instead the gospel of christ, they're going to be some pretty nice and kind people.

>If you destroyed every bit of scientific knowledge today, it would also come back but with the same story.
That's not necessarily true, fucking simpleton. Read Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions and educate yourself.

>never hold onto truth
Science is a method of ascertaining truth beyond reasonable doubt. And it's the only method to get anywhere close to the truth

Why do you presume empirical replicability is necessarily or exclusively reasonable?

What in the actual fuck are you talking about you god damn lunatic?

Most great ideas were proven wrong. Newtonian physics was BTFO by relativity and quantum physics. The kicker here is that relativity and quantum physics are themselves contradictory. Let's not get into string theory because that will just shit up the chan without any resolution.

Being killed by your family

Contrasting the different understandings of the scientific method

ie. Verificationism vs Falsificationism

Leaving Islam is punishable by death, so be careful around Muslims. Being Christian requires you help others in need (charity/donations or volunteer work), be kind, turn the other cheek, and all that. You just live a peaceful and good life and your reward is eternal life - no need to 'Allahu Ackbar' or 'DEUS VULT' or anything. You can eat whatever - you'll grow to like bacon and non-Halal food. You can drink, smoke, and even gamble, within moderation - from what I gather, those are all forbidden in Islam.

Christianity doesn't really expect much from anyone, aside from what was mentioned.

We gain insight into the jihadist mentality by reference to the Silmarillion. Three jewels that contain the divine light captured from the Two Trees of Valinor that light the universe, have been stolen from Fëonor, the Noldor prince who had created them, by Melkor, the Dark Lord of that age, who in the act of theft has also murdered Fëonor’s father. In a mad rage, Fëonor does something that has enormous consequences for himself and the future of the world:

>"Then Fëanor swore a terrible oath. His seven sons leapt straightaway to his side and took the selfsame vow together, and red as blood shone their drawn swords in the glare of the torches. They swore an oath which none shall break, and none should take, by even the name of Ilúvatar, calling the Everlasting Dark upon them if they kept it not; and Manwë they named in witness, and Varda, and the hallowed mountain of Taniquetil, vowing to pursue with vengeance and hatred to the ends of the World Vala, Demon, Elf or Man as yet unborn, or any creature, great or small, good or evil, that time should bring forth unto the end of days, whoso should hold or take or keep a Silmaril from their possession."

Up to this point, the Elves have been happy beings. But so attached to the Silmarils are Fëanor and his followers that in response to the crime that has been done to them they throw away all goodness, all virtue in order to get the Silmarils back. They declare war against all beings, “Vala, Demon, Elf or Man as yet unborn.” After the oath is taken, they kill a group of fellow Elves who possess ships that the Noldor need to sail to Middle-earth to win back the Silmarrils. The "Kinslaying at Alqualondë", marks the descent of the Noldor into evil.

Their possessive, murderous, cosmic hatred is like the jihadists, who see all non-Muslims in the world as maliciously holding what rightfully belongs to Islam, namely, possession of the whole earth.

Oh fuck. Please google the definition of falsifiability, you retard. We must be able to test the truth and know the result it would provide, were it false. It doesn't have to become false every few years you stupid cunt.

There is no empirical evidence for string theory. It remains a hypothetical concept

Technically this is true for everyone

So my fridge is neither invented by scientific methods and the helium it uses to cool my food is actually just invisible, magical god farts?

I don't expect you to be erudite in matters of scientific understanding my pop-science friend

The idea that Science verifies truth has long-since been abandoned

Maybe

What's also interesting is that allah is worshipped with the crescent and star, and is in fact the worship god is talking about of the guardian cherub that was in the garden of god (ezekiel 28 isaiah 14) where the symbol is given, where you read lucifer son of the morning or whatever, what it says in hebrew is heylal bin sahar/saharon Oh you star/brightness sahar/saharon of (bin) the crescent (heylal/hilal)

Oh you star and crescent how have you fallen.. The bible is given the symbols of the worship of the guardian cherub as god.

Allah fits perfectly with this including the warnings of beheadings and all the rest of it.. And is the more ancient sin/suen or bel the moon god which is also mentioned in the bible, bel bows neebo stoops.. isaiah 46
biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah 46&version=KJVhttp://biblehub.com/commentaries/isaiah/46-1.htm

biblebelievers.org.au/moongod.htm
biblebelievers.org.au/islam.htm

>But sharia law is not in effect in europe yet, also apostates from islam are some pretty tough cookies, because they know what the consequences are.

Clearly you are not following what happening in the world. Islam is infecting most of the west and in Europe the uk is the next stop. Someone who is openly asking "What can I expect in the future?" obviously is not "some pretty tough cookies, because they know what the consequences are."

It seems obvious you are on the Christian side with "zealotry of islam and follow instead the gospel of christ" and if you are prepared to get between the mudslims and their apostate buddies you also better be prepared for a new crusade.

TLDR: This guy signed his own sharia death warrant and sharia does not have to be the law the courts accept for the mudslimes to behead you in the streets. Western society does not have accept sharia because its already in effect anywhere islam infects.

F

Eternal Salvation and overtime a change in heart, welcome to the Christian World, brother. May God bless you and all you do righteously :)

Essentially because it works. I know you're making a philosophical refutation of the scientific method, but fuck you. A falsifiable, replicable theory has predictive capabilities. We can build a plane, and it will fly. Why would you presume any system of acquiring knowledge is necessarily reasonable, and the acquired knowledge is true?

Well the Bible is technically a collection of books many of which are older than 2000 years, also the Bible supported a spherical Earth at a time when most societies described the Earth as a table, the only reason for the 'muh flat earth bible' is based upon the use of the word circle in older bibles rather than sphere due to Hebrews using the same word for circle and sphere and similarly Middle English also lacked a word for sphere so consequently translates it as such however at no point is the Earth referred to as flat . Furthermore you do realise the earliest Christians live in a time when the round Earth was common knowledge and therefore also believed the Earth was round given the fact that it's in support of what is said in scripture?

Go on then. Why can science not verify truth in regards to the universe?

>Why would you presume any system of acquiring knowledge is necessarily reasonable, and the acquired knowledge is true?

Because otherwise I would not be able to know truth

It does not follow that you go from there to experiments that establish empirical replicability

Now all he has to do is go spread the good news to his other muslim friends. I am sure they will be absolutely thrilled to join him in his new decision.

If it was such an inevitability for science to arrive why didn't we see the same ideas emerge in geographically isolated parts of the planet? And why have we not yet rediscovered how to make Greek fire?

Because it's a logical absurdity and it refutes itself

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-refuting_idea#Verification-_and_falsification-principles

You've come from worshipping a sandnigger to a dead Jew. Congrats! Both globalist foreign faiths.

Convert to Bhuddism or Nihilism. Everything else is wrong.

A system of acquiring knowledge is necessarily reasonable, because otherwise you would not be able to know truth?
What if you are simply unable to know truth?

>t. @truepagan_stonehenge2016

>What if you are simply unable to know truth?

Then I could now know if that's true or not

If we were all robots that would defeat the purpose of producing sentient beings and furthermore naturally a just God has laws just as your parents made rules and must enforce them accordingly, however like a good parent God should you apologise and admit you have in fact broken the rules and apologise and try to learn from your mistakes i.e keep his commandments he will not exact the punishment you were due.

Is this not a problem for logical systems in general? Any rule for the progression or development of a logical argument cannot, in itself, be verified by a logical system. To try to give an example, logical laws themselves cannot be verified by logic

Die in hell, paki.

That's why logic is axiomatic

Our most fundamental presumptions are intuitively ascertained as set rules and definitions

Obviously. So you have to assume that you can know truth. Likewise, if one cannot make the assumption that empirical observation is a legitimate mechanic for learning about the universe, they cannot learn about the universe.

Yes. So why could it not be that empirical observation being a legitimate mechanic is an axiom?

I'm all right with presuming the veridicity of empirical senses. I just don't see how experimental replicability and scientific consensus adds any more truth and certainty to the matter

Also applies to

Hey fellow apostate

Lel not just becoming an atheist, Christianity is more theologically redundant than islam. good luck with that trinity

Expect to be murdered by people you once called friends.
Thus is the nature of the religion of peas

Oh. Right. Well, I'd say that once one presumes that empirical senses are valid, they have to take steps to ensure that any possible flaw in the observation is eliminated (excluding the obvious fact that using senses is not necessarily valid), which can be done through repetition for verification.

Being fucked by pigs for all eternity, infidel