Death Wish, starring Bruce Willis, is now apparently the Alt Right movie of the year.
Official Movie of the Alt Right
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
The audacity of these white males making a film
I thought that was Dunkirk.
>eli roths death wish remake starring bruce "i gave up a long time ago but still keep taking roles" willis
is new york even dangerous anymore? how will this work
Looks like one of those shitty old-cop-goes-rogue-to-defend-his-town films on Best of the Worst
Yeah fuck Charles Bronson that alt-right asshole
its in chicago this time
But the book Death Wish was based off of was critical of vigilantism.
It's in Chicago this time and yes, Chicago is as bad as Kabul these days.
They literally did Death Wish 3
ugh, so true
Death Wish Hard
What the fuck
Is it because it's a man getting revenge for his dead wife?
#handsupdon'tshoot
#BLM
#justice4trayvon
that makes sense then
still a terrible pick for kersey though
>hurr alt righters like dumb shit durr
If this isn't the most blatant viral marketing campaign of the last year I don't know what is.
>suddenly lots of "journalists" talking about another shitty remake at the same time trailer releases
Oh fuck that's why it looks so putrid
Pls explain.
Candy ass morons.
If Dirty Harry was made today they'd call it more fascist than Triumph of the Will
Whites should be killed and marginalized it's true
stop being white and racist
Which one of you did this?
>(((Eli Roth)))
#NotMyDirector
Alt-right is just a code word for "something I disagree with"
>that thumbs up
nice touch, faggot
I guess from this guys perspective there are only victims of police brutality and not victims of violent people?
The dude who wrote "trust me I'm lying" proves that this works really well. Considering there is more than one thread about this movie on Sup Forums I'd say Sup Forums certainly isn't immune to shilling.
>based jason
whats funny is that the screenwriter is one of the biggest anti trump pussies on twitter. all this backlash is going to redpill him
It will be kino.
eli roth has never made a good anything though
How exactly is this any more alt-right than Denzel Washington doing the Equalizer?
A
Baltimore is worse, at least twice the murder rate.
You know exactly why.
hes white
Fuck you, Baltimore!
Will we see Sup Forums defend another shit film because of contrarianism?
I'd watch a Death Wish remake with a black protag going ape on other blacks+latinos who killed his family desu
It's Eli Roth though, Sup Forums has it's limits, even when he's pandering to it.
>Eli Roth
Kino
>alt-right
Noo it's just right
Fair or not, I can't think of a more tone-deaf idea in this political/social environment than white filmmakers remaking Death Wish...
After all the BvS posting, I don't think Sup Forums has any limits.
Pls i hope they don't touch dirty harry tbqhwy.
Killing the people that raped and kill a family member is alt-right? What a bunch of babies.
the liberal version would be getting angry at the guy because when he couldn't watch in the corner like a cuck
ARGHHH FICTION IS TRIGGERING ME AGAIN HEEELLLPPPPP
> people should not take the law into their own hands. this trailer is irresponsible.
> the law is untrustworthy; especially to minorities
these people live in a fantasy land
would like to hear an explanation about what exactly is the "alt-right" and what makes this an "alt-right" movie, specifically
basically "everything I dont like is alt-right"
A white guy shoots some black guys. Because that's apparently something the alt-right does
I ain't clicking that shit. Where's the archive?
>it is impossible to want both responsible law enforcement and less vigilante justice simultaneously
are you a fucking retard? you can criticize something (law enforcement) in an attempt to improve it
Why cant we get based koreans movie instead?
How's that "alt-right"?
Vigilantism is something everyone can look at favorably
>Vigilantism is something everyone can look at favorably
wut? Vigilantism is why BLM is a fucking terrorist organization.
In reality, it's just a trendy name for "New Age Conservatism" because it's made up of people that don't fit old GOP stereotypes and is more of a mix of people with negative reactions towards "Regressive left" sentiments rather than any real unifying ideology.
it's ok when minorities do it
The law mostly reacts to crime rather than preventing it. It is the right of every person to defend themselves from harm by any means possible. These SJWs are mad about that aspect more than any other:
Vigilante justice is normal justice enacted when the state fails to do its job.
>Vigilantism is something everyone can look at favorably
Yeah, especially those black guys that got lynched for daring to look at a white bitch. Do you have no knowledge of history? Vigilante justice has a dark history in the US
You are full of shit and completely philosophically inconsistent. You attempt to trap your opponent in false dichotomies that exist only in your diseased mind. You niggers need the gas chamber
>Vigilante justice is normal justice
Spotted the nigger.
t. LA Looter shot by based roof korean
>Yeah, especially those black guys that got lynched for daring to look at a white bitch
That's not vigilantism if it goes how you say it did.
Vigilantism would be:
A gang rapes and murders someone, but the police and state fail to give justice them for any specific reason, so the public takes action
>Vigilante justice has never been used for immoral ends
Do you know how fucking dumb you sound? That is like saying drug trafficking has never been used immorally. How can you judge actions without due process
>so the public takes action
Which is ALWAYS wrong.
See
Sup Forums in a nutshell.
Chicago niggas are on a whole other level. Watch any of the fucking videos on live leak or jewtube. Its like 2002 Iraq.
BLM arent vigilantes, they are violent protestors
vigilantes try to go after criminals
BLM are criminals with no sole purpose other than to disrupt society/ cause chaos, AKA terrorists
No
If the state fails to uphold its mandate, then it's on the public to do it.
The only reason you can't enact the law is because the police do it for you. If they don't, then you can.
>no true scotsman
Fuck off faggot. Vigilante justice is not one justifiable thing. It is an umbrella of morons taking the law into their own hands. This includes men murdering the wrong person because they didn't gather the necessary evidence to prove guilt. Shooting from the hip oftentimes hits the wrong fucking person
I reiterate: Spotted the nigger.
The original Death Wish was a Libertarian fantasy. Guy provides his own self-defense against the bad guys because he has no other choice because the state won't/can't help him. He affects a change on society all by himself.
The sequels were more just Conservative fantasies. Guy shoots a lot of guns and its awesome. Not much nuance to it.
Not really sure how either of these fit into it being alt right. Guess it's just a buzzword at this point to describe really anything scary.
>If they don't, then you can
No you can't. Vigilantism is illegal. No matter the circumstances. In virtually all parts of the world.
tell me
>Vigilante justice is not one justifiable thing
>state fails to uphold the law
>public does it how it's outlined in the criminal code
Justfiable
they should have cast a black guy then they wouldn't know what to think
Come on...the dude has a wife and daughter and helps black people.
Its not alt-right at all.
>Justfiable
Until you go to jail for doing it.
>state fails to gather necessary evidence
>public decides to act in spite of this to kill an innocent person
Dude. You are mentally ill.
Yeah, you can. Most criminal codes have legislation allowing for public to become police if the police fail.
If the state doesn't do something, it's on the public to do it; the public enshrines the state to uphold what it wants of it.
YOU ARE THE STATE. If the state fails, then it's on you.
>>public decides to act in spite of this to kill an innocent person
That's called murder, user. Not vigilante justice.
Know the difference.
YOU ARE ALLOWED TO APPREHEND A MURDERER IF THE STATE FAILS TO BY ITS OWN CODE. IF SAID MURDERER ATTEMPTS TO KILL YOU AS YOU DO SUCH, YOU CAN DEFEND YOURSELF LIKE ANY POLICE OFFICER
The state has standards for what is admissible as concrete evidence. The public is only satisfied when a motherfucker is hanging from a tree, regardless of guilt. Stop be a fucking idiot
>Most criminal codes have legislation allowing for public to become police if the police fail
No they don't. They have legislation allowing a sheriff or duly appointed head of police forces to temporarily deputize someone.
Legislation does not exist that says its all right for you to go out and murder someone because they got off and you THINK he's guilty.
it is a white guy going after minorities and being a vigilante. he is taking "justice" into his own hands because the established powers that be, won't. its at best a general gun-nut fantasy and at worst a vague allowance of alt-right propaganda. given the current political climate of the US, they're basically begging for these connections to be made regardless of the actual validity of them. see: the Confederate kerfluffle on twitter and what not.
though given its being directed by Eli Roth i assume it'll all be handled incredibly poorly, be too on the nose and generally be of poor quality to the point where such articles as this will seem like the overreacting media looking for headlines. which they most likely already are.
You will win the court case in a situation where the police let a murderer run free.
There's a reason why police apprehend murders, user. When they don't, the people can rightfully do it.
>You will win the court case
Stopped reading there.
You know absolutely nothing about US law.
The funny thing is nobody watches or cares about Eli Roth's flicks.
And vigilantism is glorified anyway in the only genre that makes big money these days, the capeshit
How does one prove he is in fact a murderer?
>Legislation does not exist that says its all right for you to go out and murder someone because they got off and you THINK he's guilty
Not murder, but apprehend.
''>The state has standards for what is admissible as concrete evidence.
Yes, but the state can fail to act on it. Say, if there's no tax and the police stop working. Who will apprehend murderers? It's up to you if you care.
>movie will totally suck
>reviews will be shit
>alt right cucks will claim it's a liberal conspiracy
Screencap this
...
it's already been pointed out this is probably a marketing stunt
>YOU ARE ALLOWED TO APPREHEND A MURDERER IF THE STATE FAILS TO BY ITS OWN CODE.
You're kinda wording it weirdly. You are allowed to apprehend wanted criminals. You are also allowed to do a citizen's arrest on someone breaking US law(but you have to be sure you have ample proof or you're essentially engaging in kidnapping). What you're not allowed to do is think you have determined someone is a murderer and detain them or do anything to them really if the police aren't looking for them.
If you kill someone during an attempt to "apprehend" them despite no police wanted notice, you are the aggressor that broke the law and you will be charged with manslaughter/possibly murder.
Yes, and doctors use to use infection carrying leeches to cure people. Nuclear energy was deemed impossible my the worlds leading physicists, and porn used to be weird black and white photos of pale chicks without cum on their faces. but that doesn't mean those things are inherently bad.
If you witness the crime or someone else does, and for whatever reason, say corruption (the murderer is a family member of a politician), the police refuse to do it.
It's now on you.
This is morally justifiable.