Found this on Jewbook and like most things liberals post on there, I have to question its validity

Found this on Jewbook and like most things liberals post on there, I have to question its validity.

So, is it even true?

Other urls found in this thread:

kritisches-netzwerk.de/sites/default/files/Ismael Hossein-zadeh, The Political Economy of U.S. Militarism, Palgrave-Macmillan 2006, 303 pages_32.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

No it probably isn't. U.S spends only %2 of their gdp to military

Holy shit the welfare queen meme is real

What the fuck america

Mandatory vs discretionary spending

This chart is just a pure lie. Most of this spending is horseshit anyways.

No it's bullshit. They completely left out social security and medicare.

This is incredibly false.

Fuck OP don't be a faggot learn to use the internet

The real one

It basically is true. Republishits are the most disingenuous pieces of shit in this country and I hope they all hang one day.

>Education 3%
Wew

>is it even true?
Like all these unsourced images, fuck knows. It could be, seems unlikely that they'd spend over half their GDP on military stuff. It's just another one of those circlejerk echo-chamber images to post on normiebook and get epic likes. Here's my chart, you tell me if it's real or not.

Thats federal spending. Most education spending is done at the state level.

>A federal government that doesn't control everything

I know its a foreign concept to shitskins but yea, it is like that some places.

>science 1%
Entitlements more than half.

Don't believe these bigots, this is the REAL one.

It isn't even true though. The US's largest spending programs are Social Security and Healthcare.

>Burger calling argie a shitskin

No that doesn't look even remotely corret

...

Social Security is a trust fund and should not be integrated with the regular government budget

Remember: most military spending doesn't actually even show up as military spending on government accounts, its spent in a way to make it show up as other costs

A good book on this is "The Political Economy of U.S. Militarism"
kritisches-netzwerk.de/sites/default/files/Ismael Hossein-zadeh, The Political Economy of U.S. Militarism, Palgrave-Macmillan 2006, 303 pages_32.pdf

conservashits

Republitards

>It basically is true. My mother is the most disingenuous whore in this country and I hope she hangs one day.

Hardly any different yet so much more obvious.

Lol I love how liberals just invent pure fictitious lies to propagate their bullshit

It's hilarious

It's the discretionary budget. It's 1/3 or 1/4 of the total budget.

>'Government' accounts for 6% of federal spending

>Education being 3%
If only if we were like Japan but then again we are stupid americunts for braking from the brits.

should be 0%

so nothing below 94% taxes is too high? wtf? just because it happened in the past doesnt make it okay

That's one year of discretionary spending and doesn't even give the year...automatic stabilizers are 80% of our budget. Discretionary is about 20% military doesn't count as an automatic stabilizer because the administration determines it's budget along with house and Senate yearly.

Such a misleading piece of shit cartoon, like all political cartoons ever conceived. The 90+% periods were a time where so many tax loopholes existed that only a tiny fraction of someone's wealth actually had that high 90% rate applied to it. As the tax loopholes were closed, the rates dropped comparably. What a dumb as fuck picture and I'm not surprised in the least that a dumb fucking leaf poster would post it.

this

Here have some more "statistics".

Trump says he wants to make Europe and Asia pay their share of the military defense that we provide for them. This will cut costs for us. On the other hand, it will raise costs for those other countries, several of whom are used as examples of "democratic socialism," where they spend a lot of money on various social services because they don't have to pay the full price for their military defense, because the American taxpayer is covering their costs for them.

Trump says it's time for the American taxpayer to stop subsidizing social programs in European countries. In my view, that is not a radical idea.

%0 how stupid are you and what state do you live in? We have schools around the whole damn country it's just that the 3% is the retarded public and wait forget even the private are basically controlled by the jews. Damn my life.

Democrats villians of the world are literally the Monopoly Man

Fucking children

>Shilltistics

>Obama increases taxes on rich
Bitch where?

I concur. They won't get away with increasing taxes further to accommodate higher military spending, so they'll have to cut the gibs.

Regardless of the practicality, I don't think it's fair for American taxpayers to fork the dough for our share.

United States Department of Defense is the largest company in the world.

There are more loopholes now than ever before you globalist elite cockksucking scumbag

>Include 2009 recovery spending explosion under Bush
>Obama keeps spending enormous and climbing higher
>A low spender
Fucking democrat memes are so out of context it triggers the fuck out of me

Where the FUCK is Medicare?

The page that hosts that image is the first thing that comes up when you google "us government spending". However if you scroll down you'll find another one that compares mandatory with discretionary spending to show that the us spends more on welfare handouts than military, the latter of which only being something like 30% if I remember correctly.

>clinton increases taxes on the rich

the cold war ended you stupid kike.

...

>completely missing the point
Read the post again, folium.

>people still dont realize that discretionary spending is different that total spending

...

How is it legal for a country to be that white?

Learn how to read a chart you fucking retard

For which country?
I imagine US because the graph as the shape of a pie. I am right?

(((Berg)))

A big part of welfare that people don't think about are the prisons, where people are provided with food, shelter, and health care for no cost. The cost to the taxpayer is over $40,000 a year, which at 2.3 million prisoners comes to $92 billion a year.

That's a cost picked up by the states, though, so it's not in this federal chart.

The """""stimulus""""" wasn't the only spending, needle dicked leaf, and you of course neglect the fact that Dubya was wrapping up the Iraq war that Obongo was about to sabotage in his classic founding of ISIS

He's so black that he wouldn't notice an extra crisp layer of ashes.

He's posting Politifact, it's just a troll

>Medicare/Health
Should be cut dramatically and upped only in times of emergency
>social security
Shouldn't even be on there
>debt interest
Should take the funding from social security
>sciences/education/military
Should be split evenly from the medicare

Come and try to hang me. Bring 50 friends. I will shoot every one of you cocksuckers before you get within 100 yards of me. Except for the ones I wound, because I want to finish them off with my hands.

>like all political cartoons ever conceived

Hold on now, some are pretty based.

>heh... nothing personnel, kids

>the fish
>the boat

That chart is of discretionary spending. Food stamps is non-discretionary spending and thus is not included in the chart.

Have fun getting shot in the head by gracious leader you cuck

This. It's probably discretionary spending.

In overall spending, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and all other entitlements are easily the largest group.

I'm definitely one to advocate for a strong military.
But we are becoming victims of the military industrial complex that Eisenhower warned us about. We spend too much on such small programs that may be more technologically advanced, but shit on our budget.
Technology doesn't win, numbers do.
Take for instance the German tiger tank of world War 2. Extremely sophisticated war machines for the time, but got fucked up by a bunch of Shermans. Not because they were superior tanks, but because we had 10 of them for every 1 tiger.
It's the same today. Why spend 800 million on one F35 when you could make 10 A10s for the same price? And the A10 is a battle proven, practical air weapon. The F35 is a nightmare.

That famous economist bill gates? Kill yourself you thieving degenerate faggot