Marvel Censoring Tony Stark’s Hot Bod

Reset the counter.

bleedingcool.com/2016/09/01/marvel-comics-is-censoring-tony-starks-hot-bod/

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=l5aZJBLAu1E
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

Well at least they're both anti cheesecake AND anti beefcake

But no loss, those variant covers were awful in general
Pubebeard Loki still haunts me

Marvel's aversion to Beefcake is annoying as fuck what the hell is going on

I miss the swimsuit issues so much.

Reminder they put a shirt on unworthy Thor.

Marvel needs to fuck off with this shit. Give the people what they want and what they want is beefcake.

Every decision this company makes makes me hate them more.

Is Marvel current policy to not make anything sexy anymore?

Are their that sterile?

>Tony showing all those muscles like filthy man-sluts

Haram! Absolutely haram! Men are not to be sexualized!

>Wada and Anka pitched a new swimsuit special
>50/50 split of cheese/beefcafe
>Marvel didn't greenlight it

so fucking disappointing.

it's just so weird!!!

i don't see the point. the people who buy comics are twenty somethings at least. they're fine with sex and cheese/beefcake

That is so dumb.

Since the wave of censorship is coming from the left this time and the left owns the media, they're actually doing it this time instead of laughing at soccer moms and protestants

I'm actually kind of glad. If you're going to censor clevage and butts then you may as well censor everything else too. Hell, why not have them wear a fucking hijab while you're at it, Marvel? Keep it up!

It's such an odd editorial choice. It's not like it's some kind of industry wide thing. Why does Marvel choose to be like this? I mean at other companies you have shit like pic related where they're competing over who can be more lewd and no one really minds besides "muh pure husbando" types on tumblr.

lol, it's just a guy putting on a shirt, jesus Sup Forums

But i do questiin why he would put on the suit without a shirt.
He'll be all sweaty or get chafted.

>only actual difference is he's wearing a vacuum sealed skin tight shirt with perfect ab contouring

This is so fucking dumb. I've always hated how cape heroes are drawn essentially nude with body paint, it's so stupid looking. I mean I'm fine with cheese/beef but I've never liked that cape heroes usually wear the equivalent of body paint.

King won that competition. And that's also why Seeley can't have beefcake in Nightwing

Everyone in the MU should wear a Burkini and never go to France.

>cheesecake by Anka and Wada
Haha, fuck them.
Maybe they should have pitched 50% beefcake by them and 50% cheesecake by Cho and Schitti

This is somehow dc's fault

Schitti is shitty.

the suit should have some comfortably lining already to take care of that imo, shouldn't be a concern

I'm pretty sure Raptor is going to attempt to rape Dick so he'll probably get disheveled there

Doesnt hurt to be extra prepared

>That small gap between where his dick would be and how much is being censored

Unless Dick has a chode, this doesn't quite add up.

The best thing would be equal cheesecake and beefcake. But if not, then I'm for equal censorship.
I'm all for equal censorship
No cheesecake? Ok, then no beefcake
No woman nipples? Ok, no man nipples

DC won so Marvel decided not to compete?

>censoring

This word again

I guess it depends, we don't know Marvel's justification yet but it's entirely possible that they censored their work.

You don't understand angles and perspective, do you?

What I love about DC is they "objectify" both their male and female heroes/villains.

dc comics characters are hot as fuck.

Marvel's war on beefcake has to be stopped. Taking away cheesecake is one thing, but beefcake is unacceptable

You should worry about the fact one leg is drawned from behind/the side while the other is from the front like the rest of his body.

>the chin on that blue haired girl
Still would.

You know what they say about women with big chins?

N-No

Mostly unkind things about their giant chins.

I thought it was something worse

Tell me about it, they casually have Tim and Damian shirtless all the time and those 2 are minors.

They have big chins to cum on?

>Marvel won't show a guy's nipple
>DC will draw half the JL as strippers
This is why rebirth is successful

So beefcake thread?
youtube.com/watch?v=l5aZJBLAu1E

You now the upcoming Ikemen line thing included Tim and Damian in the doodles

>rebirth
that cover isn't from rebirth idiot

None of them have nipples though

*now remember
aw

I'm aware, user

Thank you based DC

Thank you based Ricken

>Lover of masks, capes, and derriéres
Indeed.

>practically spray-painted on shirt, looks like he's wearing nothing at all
>MUH MANMEAT CENSORSHIP

Yeah, I can't really force myself to care, what with the earlier whining about boobsocks, and such, when everyone seemed like they were sporting the painted-on look.

This

It would be a nice change for equality, to actually mean equal.

Yeah, and Damian is posing like a little slut.

No, if you really want to burn Marvel you have to compare them to a Christian sect, like the purtians.
Look at that whore in the middle. She's a DC character for sure.

I fail to see the problem senpai.

It makes sense for him to wear an extra piece of cloth beneath the armored suit. It's basically a Zero Suit.

Dick taught him well.

Starfire is basically going to be his mom in the new book too. He never had a chance to turn out pure.

The problem is that the worm has turned, user.

Is Marvel run by muslims or something?

No cheesecake, no beefcake, what the fuck is their problem?

>the worm has turned

This is literally the first time I see that phrase used in normal speech. What's up with people using old expression that no normal people use?

I enjoy cheesecake and think it's wrong when it's censored.

I don't enjoy beefcake and also think it's wrong when it's censored.

Just sex my shit up publishers...

Forgive me, user, I have a masters and sometimes I forget to talk like a human.
It is 100% unintentional.

Exactly. And what does that even accomplish? Instead of seeing Tony's bare pecs and abs, you're stuck with seeing Tony's pecs and abs with black paint on.
This is so stupid.

They are trying to spin this so you get "equality" with objectification on both sexes so they can get away with more for female characters

How is Tony ripped?

>They are trying to spin this so you get "equality" with objectification on both sexes so they can get away with more for female characters

So the problem is?

The customers they are trying not to offend don't actually exist.

Why aren't you?

>Still no return to god of stories Loki

Why does Aaron hate us so much, Sup Forums? Is it because we keep making fun of him?

Fanservice is an objectively better term than beefcake and cheesecake.

the best part is you can see where they painted his nipple out

It's not really specific enough. There's non-sexual fanservice as well. Beefcake and cheesecake make it clear what you're talking about.

>le progressive Marvel

>Starfire is Damien's step-mom with poor boundaries
This is like my hentais or cringey amateur POV porn
How is he not? He's for the most part a normal dude, well he used to be like FOREVER ago. Tony wanting to keep fit in the likely circumstance he's stuck without a suit is just common sense. Plus it looks good.
He probably could even invent one of those vibrating exercise belts that actually works.
Oh wow that looks awful. Thanks for pointing it out.

Why do you need to be specific? Also the term fanservice sounds much less dumb than cheesecake.

bruce would have shaved the batsymbol in to his chest hair

>The customers they are trying not to offend don't actually exist.

Maybe they do it on principle, some people do really believe there should be a better balance.

Also those customers do exist, I know some of them.

Because we're usually talking about specific cheesecake and/or beefcake.
Who cares if it sounds dumb? We're talking about comic books on a Siberian Pottery Message Board.

Fan service implies the artist is doing it for the fans. Sexy people are just flat out more fun to draw for lots of artists.

Why would you not want to to be specific? If you're casually talking about how a book is good or bad because of "fanservice" that's not really descriptive enough for someone to know what you mean. You'd have to also explain yourself and express what definition you're using. If you use another term (beefcake, cheesecake, character wanking, etc) then they'd know what you mean without that added step.

Balance doesn't have to mean "cover everyone up". Assuming that's what people who talk about equality are asking for is dumb.

>Because we're usually talking about specific cheesecake and/or beefcake.

Why? Fanservice gets the point across, and more people use that term.

So you know people wjo would have shied away from buying shirtless Tony?
Sure you do, user.
I think we can also saftley assume that a company that thrives on manufactured controversy and is spearheded by a known liar (why was the FF canceled again?) is not wieghed down by concerns of principle.

>and more people use that term

they really don't

Most people on Sup Forums know what Beefcake/Cheesecake are as well.

The Loki he's using is pretty clearly God of Stories Loki. He's not actually evil, just rusing everyone, and he's constantly talking about narratives and shit like that.

The only thing is that dautermann gave him that god awful pube-beard. Other than that, he's still definitely the God of Stories.

Showing lots of skin have never made a lot of sense in Superhero fiction. A balance towards full suits is clearly a good idea.

Most people who do athletic stuff show a lot of skin. Why do you think it doesn't make sense?

>Marvel will never go back to the CCA days

>If you're casually talking about how a book is good or bad because of "fanservice" that's not really descriptive enough for someone to know what you mean.

Everyone knows what it means.

Johnny storm bursting into flame doesn't make a lot of sense either.
Get the fuck out.

>So you know people wjo would have shied away from buying shirtless Tony?

Dunno, but to me it looks better now. I can see it selling better.

To be fair people doing athletic shit are rarely being attacked.
To be unfair people doing athletic shit aren't usually beyond human in terms of ability.

This might be the dumbest debate I have seen here in years.
Kudos, user.

I really don't see where you're coming from that you think the sexual definition is the default, but there's no point in continuing to discuss it when that's the main difference here.

Are you going to buy it, user.

>Most people who do athletic stuff show a lot of skin.

There was also a lot of fanservice during the Olympics.

>Toonami censored things less heavily than Marvel comics now does

men's diving was literally televised porn

>buying comics

In all seriousness I buy very few comics, and pointless fanservice is usually a sign for poor writing.

how long till everyone is in burkas?

It likely is though. Censorship is not synonymous with government censorship.

If an artist draws a panel and the editorial alters it because they don't like the content, they've censored the artist

I do like beefcake, but from a technical standpoint for Iron Man, I liked the EMH thing where he wore a protective black jumpsuit under the armour.