Avada

>Avada
What was he going to do here?

murder a child in plain sight? /our/guy

He was going to rebel against Voldemort and destroy his horcruxes and /savetheworld/

Avada Loy Altee Forra HiyardGunn

I like to think he was performing the noble task of trying to spare us from having to sit through another installment of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises, seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>KEdullest franchise in the history of movie franchises.
Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>Avada Nagila
He is one of them

>mouthpieces

...

Mispronounce "Avocado".

>One Hundred Years of Solitude
>Low Tier

Stopped reading there

He wanted to tell everyone about James Cameron's revolutionary new movie, Avada.

>avada kedavra
>abra cadabra

Why do people bother replying to the chart of this copypasta? Do you also reply to the navy seal one and tell people that's it's "not gorilla warfare"?

You don't just take someone's property from them.

It's like that part near the end of 12 Years a Slave, when they came and took that guy's property from him. I cried for the ol' fella.

8/10
2/10

...

wtf i hate magic now

Because the screenwriter was a hack and the director was a lazy faggot--neither could bother to ask Rowling about spells. So Jason Isaacs just said the only offensive spell anyone could remember...even though it makes no fucking sense that Malfoy would murder Harry Potter in broad daylight for a slight as minor as freeing an elf.

New pasta?

no dumbass, this is too context specific for pasta. and there's already "dullest franchise". now everyone is going to accuse me of samefagging and trying to pasta my own post.

this is explained in the books though
basically muggles mishearing wizards and passing the phrase down in their culture

>mishear weirdo yelling something while committing murder
>use same wacky phrase for magic tricks
BRAVO ROWLING

What did he mean by this? And why didn't Tim Burton's gf kill them both while he was restraining Harry?

Also I was getting pedophile undertones from the scene where Snape leads Harry down a (pedophile) spiral staircase (shot from directly above to highlight the spiral nature of the staircase) to a basement room to be alone with him and explore the private parts of his mind.