No one NEEDS a gun

>no one NEEDS a gun

wow great thread can't wait for 300 replies

I never understood why retards want to ban guns anyways, there's never been a country where gun control reduced the homicide rate, so why bother?

stop larping as a braindead USAer or get a tripcode so i can filter your inane garbage spam

Last time I checked Canada still exist

>guns are the reason why people get shot, not the person holding it and pulling the trigger

And Canada did not see a decrease in homicides as a result of their gun control laws.

I NEED a gun

>Owning a gun is immoral

Good posts

>Seconds before this post was made
(Pic related)

We did see a decrease, but that trend was already occuring before gun control.

But that's the opposite of what commies say.

I don't like when wojak is used in an aggressive context

Idk why people equate all of the radical-left with communism. Cultural-Marxists are looked down upon by Socialists and other people as they are more concerned with class imbalance than ethnic.

I think it can be deduced that if Canada was experiencing a decreasing trend of homicides, and then they implement gun control, and the trend doesn't accelerate, then the gun control didn't do anything to reduce homicides.

Interesting to note that the USA is also experiencing a downward trend in homicides, and has for a while now.

That was my point

Yeah I know, I was just clarifying.

Can you imagine if gypsies had guns? Now tell me that wouldn't increase the homicide rate.

>every one NEEDS a gun!

Also true. People need to stop believing false dichtomies, while realizing that there is nothing wrong with vetted adults, from having firearms for hobby, and protection.

there's absolutely nothing wrong with someone owning a gun for self protection or hunting. Guns like bolt action rifles, handguns and shotguns are perfectly acceptable.
The debate we're having now is that citizens do not need assault rifles, bump stocks or high-capacity magazine.
These are weapons of war.

It wouldn't increase the homicide rate. Besides, they'd just steal guns anyways.

>assault rifles
Already heavily regulated

>bump stocks
Impossible to regulate

>high-capacity magazine
Also almost impossible to regulate, and also pointless.

We have very strict gun control and the gypsies are unable to steal any. Because of this our homicide rate has remained at European levels.
If fucking Romania can do it don't tell me America can't.

>Because of this our homicide rate has remained at European levels
But Europe didn't see a reduction of homicide rate as a result of their gun control. I don't know how long Romania's been doing it, but I guarantee you if the relaxed their gun control laws they wouldn't see an increase in homicides.

>If fucking Romania can do it don't tell me America can't.
We actually already tried it, with an assault weapons ban under the Clinton administration. Unsurprisingly, it didn't do jack shit.

>Already heavily regulated
AR-15 are the frequently used during high profile mass shootings. Almost all of them are purchased legally. In some states, buying a semi-automatic can take about an hour
It's also uncommon for AR-15's to be auctioned off in raffles or fundraisers. So much for """heavily regulated"""
>Impossible to regulate
It's not being regulated, you fucking retard. It's a nation wide ban. Citizens shouldn't have access to these.
>Also almost impossible to regulate
See above.
>also pointless.
Limiting a shooters ammo to 10 shots per magazine in comparison to 30 shots isn't pointless.
>inb4 HURRR THEY CAN STILL GET THEM ON THE BLACK MARKET
Making it harder to purchase can deter incidents. You really think an autistic manlet would go to the black market to buy any of this?

>AR-15 are the frequently used during high profile mass shootings
AR-15's are not assault rifles.

>It's not being regulated, you fucking retard. It's a nation wide ban. Citizens shouldn't have access to these.
So are you going to ban rubber bands, duct tape, belt loops, fingers, and pieces of flat wood or plastic and duct tape? Cause any one of those things can be used as a bump stock.

>See above.
See above, albeit with different household materials.

>Limiting a shooters ammo to 10 shots per magazine in comparison to 30 shots isn't pointless.
It takes less than 2 seconds to reload and it wouldn't even stop them from having a 30 round magazine (see above)

>HURRR THEY CAN STILL GET THEM ON THE BLACK MARKET
Never said anything about the black market, this shit's easy enough to make with the junk in your house.

>Gypsies are naturally peaceful and it's definitely not the lack of guns that keeps them from murdering eachother

Statistically that's the way it's been everywhere else, unless there's something in the genetics of gypsies that causes them to see and gun and suddenly desire to murder people then it should be the same with them as well.

Gypsies are like turbo niggers man. They throw babies to steal purses and shit.
> T.Euro living in cad

Having to beat someone to death with a bat is much harder than pressing a trigger and seeing the other person drop.

What bothers me is people in north American dont get WHY WE ALL HATE GYPSIES and why the should be unapologetically GASSED . Literally animals in the crude shape of man

>Grog needs gun to defend himself against intruders because every intruder has gun for some reason.

People always say gun nuts or pro gun people are idiots but all I see on this board are relatively well thought out posts on the issue. The only ones who seem irrationally angry are the ones who peddle the media’s talking points like a parrot. Actually makes me think that there’s no reason to ban guns no matter what type they are.

Calm down Codreanu.