Climate change: Manmade or not?
Climate change/global warming
Aaron Thompson
Other urls found in this thread:
ipcc.ch
climate.nasa.gov
sciencedaily.com
scientificamerican.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Liam Miller
who cares
Bentley Mitchell
nothing we can do if it is real op
Owen Martinez
its natural but we're speeding it up
Owen Morris
this
Also "global warming" was a very bad name.
>"huur dur it's snowing, global warming is fak"
Angel Foster
There we go.
Adrian Ward
Can any of you refute these claims?
Genuine curiosity and wishing to educate myself more. You people are good with trawling the internet and collecting facts and debunking each other
ipcc.ch
climate.nasa.gov
NASA is claiming there's a consensus
sciencedaily.com
scientificamerican.com
I really want some redpills on this site in particular
Connor Murphy
Let me get this straight. Carbon dioxide works to trap heat inside the atmosphere but doesn't block the heat from getting in? Shouldn't the effect be a stablization of temperature rather than volatility?
Samuel Thompson
/thread
Michael White
Climate change deniers are retards.
The actual scientific debate is about how impactful it would be and how much humans are contributing. I'm in the camp of, not much until a lot farther into the future.
This is a surprisingly good video, considerring I don't like this dude youtube.com
The actual scientific debate is about how impactful it would be and how much humans are contributing. I'm in the camp of, not much until a lot farther into the future.
This is a surprisingly good video, considerring I don't like this dude youtube.com
>what is a greenhouse
en.wikipedia.org
Andrew Clark
this
Tyler Foster
FAKE
AND
GAY
Jaxon Walker
>gives a graph with no context to the study
>the graph even shows an increase in CO2
user?
Kevin Lee
Heat energy is always added because of the sun. It's like you're putting insulation on a sunbaked roof. All it does is slow it down BUT Co2 also traps so they equal each other out
Ryder Miller
>BUT Co2 also traps so they equal each other out
>they
People can't read thoughts, user. Be more clear.
Colton Jackson
(((Climate Change))) is part of a a global conspiracy to subjugate national economies to central planning and regulation along the lines plotted by secular left-leaning jews in positions of authority in government, academia and finance. Prove me wrong.
Jace Foster
>prove me wrong
>the existence of the asteroid ring is part of a global conspiracy to subjugate national economies to central planning and regulation along the lines plotted by secular left-leaning jews in positions of authority in government, academia and finance. Prove me wrong
>same user is going to go on and on about being redpilled, but believes things that he can't prove
Okay.
Nathan Robinson
This. The main driving force of the warming we're seeing today is most likely natural in origin. Although the exact mechanism remains unknown, we've ruled out solar activity at this point.
However, human activity is absolutely exacerbating and accelerating it. Long-term climate cycles like the medieval warming period happen over centuries, not decades.
Now, with all this in mind the real question is what, if anything, can be done about it. If it is naturally driven then it's reasonable to suggest that we can't STOP the warming, but at the very least maybe we can slow it to a more manageable level. One that we can adapt to.
So how do we do that? The problem with proposed solutions to dealing with climate change from the left are that they all revolve around three things:
1) Reducing power consumption (good, but you can only do this so much before you hit a limit)
2) Reducing emissions (also good, but see above)
3) Taxing and regulating productions of emissions and issuing stupid bullshit like carbon credits (which does nothing)
The ONLY surefire way to dramatically reduce the emission of greenhouse gasses is to completely phase out fossil fuels, which is something that can't happen overnight and can't happen without a DRAMATIC increase in our utilization of nuclear fission power, which the left is vehemently opposed to.
And even IF we completely phase out the use of fossil fuels in the West, it won't solve the problem of China (which currently produces more emissions than the rest of the industrialized world COMBINED) and Africa (which is being developed by China and could become a major source of emissions in the future).
Blake Williams
this honestly scares me. I live in a small fishing village on the olympic peninsula, and this is the worst year we've ever had for fishing. the water is too warm, and fish are passing it up to go further up north. I don't see this ever getting better, which really sucks. Fishing is villages main industry, and without it there's no economy around here.
Luis Walker
It should get cooler in a few thousand years
Jacob Hughes
welp
Jaxson Lee
what this guy side. Source am in graduate school for bio-geochemistry.
James Smith
when I was in uni, I knew a lot of people who were doing GECS. All of them weren't optimistic about anything having to do with the environment