EU win the the Olympics, USA BTFO

This image was posted by the European Parliament Facebook page that has over 2 million likes.

It really triggers the thought process.

Goddamn, the fucking nerve of these useless twats.

3 European nations got medals in Handball. Seems legit.

I'm so fucking triggered

Amerifats on suicide watch.

How will they ever recover?

comparing single countries to multiple countries... epic facepalm

The EU is not a country tho

ye but it doesn't work that way

>single countries: USA, china
>multiple countries: european union
as far as i know the european union is conformed by multiple countries.

>not

Yet

I thought the Olympics were about nations putting their best athletes on the line to compete. What the fuck is the point if all the nations consist of people from other nations? A fucking muslim sword fighter, Ethiopian marathon runners etc in white countries, for example..
Also the European Union consists of many coutries, but I guess this is the way it is when they wanna create a eu federation, the greedy (((globalists)))

At least I can smile knowing that white swedes were the absolute majority in winning all our medals. Good job boys and girls

Just bury this shit already.

Get out of my country Thomasz.

Gurus are trying to convince Europeans to stop their break up.
Too late.

Is there anything the EU can't do?

so the european union is admitting they plan to fully take away the sovereignity of member nations?

>What the fuck is the point if all the nations consist of people from other nations?

Pushing the multicult, of course.

> gold, silver and bronze COMBINED

fuck off socialist union...

>using medal count instead of gold count
>EU being this butthurt

Act

Correct me if I'm wrong but the EU isn't one country

>US is a grill

eu is smaller than a fucking US so how is that not a fair comparison?

Convince people that they're a good idea.

anyone up for second brexit

I'd love to send as many athletes, a red white and blue sweep of the Olympics would be glorious.

EU comparing itself to a single nation is pretty unfair considering that they have 28 athletes/teams competing in every event compared to ours and china's 1 athlete or team per event

The concept was created when diversity doesn't existed.

It's obviously obsolete today, because everybody is a refugee somewhere!

wtf i hate brexit now

REEEEEEEEEE THE EU ISNT A FUCKING COUNTRY!!!!!! I WANNA LEAVE. PORXIT RIGHT FUCKING NOW!!!!!!

Politically the EU is more like the US than single states. All European countries send representatives to the EU and the EU issues laws which must be followed by member states like the US states and Senate/Congress. EU members and US states share a common market. They can also travel in-between each other without visas.

Higher population, and you aren't limited like we are. If we could send 50 for every single event, it'd be a slaughter.

When it comes to gold medals this shouldn't matter because every country hopefully sends their best athlete.

If the EU wants a team, fine. Then ONLY one team, and all member nations cannot compete individually

I'm surprised they didn't have hillary as the representative for the EU.

she would have won first place for handjob :^)

Because the number of athletes you get to send is not determined by land mass or number of people. Can you really say it's a fair comparison when you get to submit many many times the number of competitors than a single country?

If we're just talking about the gold there's no difference. The best team/athlete gets the gold. Even if the US did send multiple teams or athletes for the same event, only the best team US would win.

What is the ratio of players to medals, taking into account both sports where the US faced the EU and sports where the EU and the US did not have each other has competitors? Understanding Olympics performance involves taking different factors of the games into account, and excludes the raw medal count.

Each state in the EU has far less autonomy than US states do.

yeah, 28 top athletes against 1 top athlete, a fair competition if there ever was one

You'll see it soon after we leave when the EU crushes the freedom of all remaining member states

Given only a couple of people are competing at a time for a given sport, it becomes 2 USA vs. 6-8 EU, for example.

So lets divide the EU medals by how many EU countries there are, so we can normalize the data.

Every nation can only send one athlete for each event. The EU is comprised of multiple nations. Sending only one athlete for each event, the United States scored 120 different medals. Sending over 20 times the athletes, the EU received only 3 times the medals.

In other words: Europe had 20 times as many opportunities to receive medals and yet was outperformed by the US to the factor of 6.3

> PORXIT
> not Portu-go

Step up your bantz m8

It just goes to show that Europe (100% white) is superior to USA (62% white).

If the 1 US athlete was the worse it'd lose against the 28 EU athletes. If you send 27 other athletes worse than the first it wouldn't make a difference.

If they call it Porxit then the mudslimes won't try to flee there.

Okay, compare states to states.
It'd be down to what, Russia v China v UK?
That'd put California to something like 10th place or lower.

>they included the UK in the medal tally

>porxit

sounds like a solution to all muslim problems (ir you sound it out slowly, it sounds like "Porks It" :^))

...

>Europe
>100% white
You've done a pretty good job making that false, Deutsche

Nice try, Muhammad, but arabs are not white

if they're superior to the USA, why didn't they win 28 times as many medals when they sent 28 times as many athletes?

It does matter, the US didn't send the high jumper that ended up setting up a new world record because she did badly in the qualifiers.

Expecting every single athlete to be the very best at every single time is unrealistic, that's why we only have 1 Phelps and Bolt

...

# of athletes is limited by country, so the EU fields more athletes than US or China

Yeah I mean lets go full EU level crybaby and split off Texas and California and Rest of USA so that we can do gold silver bronze attacks on all sports too but then we'd have no medals for anyone else.

Is the point to just weasel your way to more medals or actually let the world participate and celebrate its people?

I'd say rather than glob people into amorphous blobs for the purposes of feeling good about ""achievements"" your people ""accomplished"" that you should be happy for your actual country and actual friends/family who DID achieve those things.

Medal count is interesting but shouldn't be the entire goal of Olympic competition.

EU inferiority complex is just dishonorable. BTW California would beat all y'all itself so fuck you.

Actually, my number was wrong. I lowballed it.

The US outperformed the EU by a factor of 10.3

EU BTFO

You're doing it wrong, the number of athletes sent is irrelevant as long as only the best are sent. If the US got to send 1 of their best and the EU got to send one of their best in a single sport, the outcome would be the same even if the US sent 20 or the EU sent 100.

>why didn't they win 28 times as many medals when they sent 28 times as many athletes?

Because there weren't 28 times more Olympic disciplines?

>American education: "Math is hard" edition

> The other Barbosa didn't even thought it through.
> Porxit = Pork-exit

Thanks oldest ally for the current name for it: Portu-go

>EU
>28 countries
>still including UK despite being told to fuck off
>"look at all of our medals guys, lol"

EU is like that annoying fat kid who rides the coattails of the popular group that hates him. For a body that claims it doesn't have any plans to become an empire, it sure is quick to take credit for the accomplishments of the nations it claims it doesn't rule over.

Actually we have almost no Muslims. They are only 0.4 of our population. It's in portugal's Wikipédia page. Muslims are no fucking problem in Portugal. For exemple I never saw a Muslim in my live except on tv.

Athletes are supposed to be at their best every time mate, else they lose. And IIRC you can send any for each comp, they sent Phelps to everything because he was the best at everything from butterfly to 400m.

Keep Great Britain inside.

>UK still a EU member
>"Why are they still considering UK a EU member?"
>"Waaaaaah, waaaaaaaah, I've run out of tampons"

We have to eliminate out athletes beforehand, and shit can happen. The best can make a mistake while qualifying. If we could send twenty to each event, that wouldn't even be an issue.

No you dumb motherfucker, it doesn't work that way. If you have 28 athletes from country A, and 1 from country B, and country A only wins about 2.75 times more than country B, then it is blatantly obvious that country B is significantly better at this event. Dividing 28 by 2.75, you get 10.3, which means that country B outperforms country A by a factor of 10.3

------------------------------------------------------ RATIO LINE ------------------------------------------------------

YOU MAY ONLY POST BELOW THE RATIO LINE IF YOUR NATIONAL OLYMPICS TEAM AVERAGED >1.000 MEDAL PER 1,000,000 OF THE POPULATION

Mate no one thinks the EU doesn't rule over its member states, it's like a Texan thinking the federal government doesn't rule over them.

And the EU does not and cannot ride on the coattails of its member state because it is made up of its member states. It's like saying white people didn't invent classical music.

Because each country has athletes that fucking compete so when you compare 50 athletes to fucking 15 of course 50 will win more you fucking idiot. Kill yourself for triggering me this hard.

to be honest this is stupid, it is like when we say that 103 went to Olympics and 54 returned with medals, statistically that's true, but unfortunately it is not how you count them

How so?

This isn't Walmart, Amerifats, stop sharting in your pants.

>tfw USA shoul be renamed to "United Stains of Shartmerica"

How does Ahmed's dick taste?

EU is claiming credit for the UK's medals, despite that the UK has the EU to fuck off. It's the purest "grasping at straws" attempt to look significant.

>itt buttblasted eurocucks

Success breads jealousy

Darker than this = It does not count as european

Sorry.

Also, Spain got 17 medals. That's the cutoff for being considered useful for something.

>How does Ahmed's dick taste?

You tell me, Amerishart.

An athlete that can't perform his best every time isn't going to make it mate. There are tons of competitions an Olympian must perform his best in, qualifiers, quarter finals, semi finals, finals.

>yuropoors taking credit for BRITISH medals

If you broke up with a girlfriend but were still forced to live with them because of a long term lease, would you go around introducing her as your partner? Fuck off Mohammed.

>20+ countries entering individually is the same thing as entering as just one country

How many competitors did the EU have and how many did the US have? Honestly curious.

Dont have kids

if you understood math, you'd know that it's not a technical impossibility to win 28 times as many medals as another nation, you're running off the assumption that the USA could never have won less medals than it did, when if eurosuperiority was so great, we should have won 28 times less medals than the EU, partly caused by the EU blocking us from many of the medals that we ended up winning this year

Your mental gymnastics don't work.

You sent the best you had (mostly niggers as usual) and you lost. It's that simple.

>If you broke up with a girlfriend

Can your please rephrase that analogy to include "fleshlight" so as to be more applicable to your own life?

>a body of unelected representatives is a representation of its states

wew lad

>EU
>British flag

>Amerishart being as "good" at math as they are at the Olympics

Did you not understand?
Do you think the US send 10 pole vaulters? Nope, only 2.
The EU can send over 40.

>hurr durr if they're the best it doesn't matter

The fact is that "the best" can fail, especially during the Olympics (have you noticed that Olympic records are always lower than world's records?).

Then it's time for the 2nd best to shine, and when it come to 2nd bests, 40 will do better than 1.

stupid fucking dickhead?

Look at this salty kraut. Enjoy watching your motherland decay into an islamic shithole.

not true, the eu is ~55% more populated than the us. we still btfo the us per capita though, and that's without 30 million genetically engineered niggers

we do get to bring more athletes than the us but it doesn't matter as most of them will never win a medal, same for the us, what really matters is how populated your nation is, what matters is per capita medals

155% of their population
270% of their medals

you do the math...

>1 country sent its best
>vs 27 countries sent their best
>you count the 27 countries best as one entity
>we totally won!!

lmfao its honestly pathetic that Europeans are that insecure

Of course... got to take advantage while we still can.

It's like when my gypsy family and I come to Britan , we have to steal as much as we can until we get thrown out.

>Do you think the US send 10 pole vaulters? Nope, only 2.

When USA sends its people, they're not sending their best.

if you read the OP you'd know that the comparison being made is the sum total of bronze silver and gold. at 120 medals, we won 28 times more medals than many nations this year

they have pretty much same autonomy but if think about it, states are free from all the bullshit countries have to go in international organization, there are some really backwards states in US but no one really cares, because they have freedom to act like that, while lets say Bulgaria in EU need to put with same shit Germany, even tho Bulgaria doesn't agrees with Germany politics (Arizona can always say fuck you to lets say California)