Marvel has bad cinematography-

>Marvel has bad cinematography-

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/hpWYtXtmEFQ?t=39
youtube.com/watch?v=doaQC-S8de8
youtube.com/watch?v=BHVbbcHWX4k
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

wow it's an actor sitting in front of a green screen

Empty balanced pretty pictures does not equate "good" cinematography.

You're supposed to cut off in the middle of the word not put a dash on the end of it you fucking dolt.

But then people wouldn't know what word it is.

Really nigger?
>cinematogra-
>picture of a movie next to it
People won't figure out what you're talking about?

It should have been:

>Marvel has bad cinematog-

You can tell what the word is and it fits the structure of the meme.

What if they mistake it for "cinematographers" or "cinematographistry"?

I couldn't fall asleep tonight so I put on Captain America: Civil War. I was asleep in no time.

Please just go back to redit I beg you

why not just type marv- if it is so easy to figure out the rest of the text fucking summerfags leave this board

>videogame CGI background
woah

>putting on the third movie in a trilogy without having seen the others
What idiot does this?

>M- h- b- c-

>I praise CGI in all sorts of non-comic book movies but the moment Marvel does it it's suddenly not okay.

>that giant pole in the middle of the pillars

it's fucking rank

That's the Washington Monument you filthy chav.

looks shit

This, cinematography isn't just pretty frames.

The visual narrative is the most important aspect.
Quality cinematography isn't just pretty pictures but actually telling the story using visual narrative through framing and composition and the performances.
So the context is important, you can't judge it by a screenshot alone.

There is technically bad cinematography, like too strong obvious night scene lighting or breaking the 180 rule for no reason.
And there is bad cinematography because of the lack of actual substance, empty pretty pictures which only fill the form without actually using framing and composition to propell the visual narrative.
And I think the second one is a bigger problem in today's industry because everyone can learn basic photography and produce balanced well framed pictures, but it takes talent/vision to be able to actually tell the story through the visuals.

End of blog post, carry on

So's your sense of fashion.

nah

Yeah bruv.

...

...

not even english champ

sorry I don't like your shitty little post

...

you're*

you are*

...

Pretty sure op has no idea what cinematography means

pretty pictures != cinematography

but actually the reason every marvel film looks and sounds the same and is made with minimal artistic effort is because they are as much art as a whopper represents coocking. its just a product you are chimping or pretendchimping out about and you should honestly stop

Yeah the camera guy did a good job shooting that giant green screen.

Marvel has good cinematogra-

youtu.be/hpWYtXtmEFQ?t=39

Explain what cinematography is.

This is the movie equivalent of kitschy overrendered fantasy card game illustrations.

Why did I bump this thread? It should have slid into oblivion.

It means a guy chooses the way the scenes are shot, focused and framed.

Not a team of CGI people animating on their computers all week long.

The study or art of using camera postioning and framing to convey something

>kitschy overrendered fantasy card game illustrations.
Literally no idea what you're even describing.

That's CGI not cinematography

overrendered illustrations made by someone called kitschy for fantasy card games if I had to guess

>pretty colors = cinematography
it isn't even following the rule of thirds

that is cgi retard not cinematography

If he doesn't provide a picture I doubt it exists.

oh wow

This hurts my eyes. The contrast is set up to 11. Turn it down for fucks sake.

Wow, a bunch of Windows backgrounds. Get on Cimino's level

WOW BLUE AND ORANGE
KINO ????

...

What are you trying to say with this?

the horizon line, dumbass

Better than DC's gray and...uh... gray.

?

actually no, it's as cliché and tired
it's like having to choose between the bubonic plague and cholera, just fuck off already

you can't be this dumb
why are you even in a cinematography thread?

Nonsense. You can make up a any bullshit narrative for OP's pic and it would fit 90% of the time. You fell for the kino meme. that's ok tho, happened to us all

Look here

Marvel is kino

this movie actually had an oscar winner cinematographer

That's a screensaver, not good cinematography

What that post is saying that you can't argue what's "good cinematography" on a 3 second clip or a few screenshots alone, that context matters.

Just explain it instead of being a smug asshole.

That's great, people should do images like that for more Marvel movies.

You still have to frame and compose a shot just like in real life with CGI you absolute turboautists, you're even more retarded than OP

>pretty cgi vistas
>good cinematography

literally just watch that every frame a painting vid about Avengers and Kurosawa and you see the difference between good cinematography and marvel

youtube.com/watch?v=doaQC-S8de8

yeah lol i just linked a every frame a reddit vid to Sup Forums but its a really good vid

What's wrong with EFAP? Don't let the shitposters get you down.

Marvel is television

>inb4 a bunch of Sup Forums leeches start posting twitter screencaps of his profile about some surface-level politics like that even changes anything about the quality of his channel

>Sup Forums - Television and Film
Don't see a problem.

>What's wrong with EFAP

he doesn't up frequent enough

>I don't know composition: the comment

Television looks better than Marvel now

Sort of related, but does anyone know how they film those top down shots of the city where they're flying over them? I really like those and they're usually so smooth.

youtube.com/watch?v=BHVbbcHWX4k
Like the part at 2:08 in this.

Also is there a name for what it is that I'm talking about?

helicopters

with an expensive camera attached to the bottom of a helicopter?????

Yeah Game of Thrones is definitely more cinematic than Marvel now. Marvel cinematography puts me to sleep. It's such a waste of a comic book setting.

What's up with Catwoman? She dressed like she's a huge fan of BDSM.

she's a huge fan of BDSM

You said all there is to say, OP, it truly is awful.

>Movies have gotten wider throughout the years.

Neat.

FUCK MOS. FUCK BVS. FUCK SS. FUCK WW. FUCK JL. FUCK DCEU.

MORRAKNULLER ZACK ODLA ALT. GLAD FOR AT DATRA HANS DÆVA!

We need to go wider.

VLC sure makes the juiciest screnshots

kys

At least it's not bland and lifeless like the other Marvel movies, or dark and hard to see like BvS.

Oooh, a basic usage of the rule of thirds and teal/orange comp.

>explicitly states that GotG2 looks much better
>thats the movie this thread is about

>good looking shots equal good cinematography
sure

Glad you agree.

The only good thing about the washington monument is the dick jokes your dad makes when you visit there at 13.

WoW! What a nice CGI!
die you faggots capeshit shills

the video says that they're using a different camera for it, GOTG 2 hadn't even come out when this was made you mong

and that from the previews it looks better, "less flat"

You sound childish as frick.

>every marvel movie outside of GotG has absolutely shit cinematography and colors
>GotG 1 was alright looking
>GotG 2 varies from alright to someone vomiting a rainbow on the screen

That doesn't look good OP, you probably think that looks good because you've been conditioned by garbage
And GotG 2 was atrocious compared to the 1st

what video game is this?

For the record the "Introspective Moment" shot for Batman Returns shouldn't be that one. That's just him receiving the call to go to work

>hurr durr video games are bad
When will Sup Forums grow up? You literally only ever see people whining about video games in cape threads. Really makes you think.

>grown man playing with action figures is seen as a manchild
>grown man who is playing with videotoys isn't