Cunt

>cunt
>why aren't you an ancap yet?

Anarchocapitalism is the best political stance.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Hu7Mzs1qRMs
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

We have all the cuties:

youtube.com/watch?v=Hu7Mzs1qRMs

And they haven't ruined themselves with pink hair, tattoos and piercings.

*tips fedora*

The leftist guy in the video, literally says, "no ma'am, incorrect!"

I am one though

no roads :DD

Anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron

>""""""""""""AN""""""""""""-cap
lol

Yeah, figures, considering you're a Jew and everything. Outcasts cannot rely on society to protect them so it's better to not have one at all.

I have the same mindset.

I think it's because we are both merchant nations

Though in reality most people in my country are either socialists or national socialists

No it's not. It is traditional anarchism that is an oxymoron.

>capitalism
No.

how long will it take for an ancap society to turn into gangland with multiple, armed, rival factions?

how is an ancap country gonna defend itself against foreign invasion?

>gangland with multiple, armed, rival factions?

You mean, like the present day situation?

There is no country and no borders.

Yes it is.
Define anarchism and then define capitalism. If those ideas can't match it is indeed an oxymoron.

how?

It's states today with some radical movements like islamism.
What would be so different under ancap? What would hinder any group that would want to impose its will on society.

Anarchism as defined by the commies is basically communism.

Anarchism as defined outside of the commie sphere is just the absence of a state.

You can have capitalism without a state. You just need a decentralised system of maintaining property rights: i.e. private defense agencies.

>Anarchism as defined by the commies is basically communism
A brianlet reddit spacer. Imagine my shock.
>private defense agencies
Feudalism with mercantilism is now anarchism.

...

What do you need a state for, exactly?

>What would hinder any group that would want to impose its will on society.

You mean like the state? I don't know cause it won't exist.

because I don't want to live in fallout

>private defense agencies
Sounds like feudalism to me.

This, sadly.

State aparattus isn't something mechanic and automated you know. States are runned by people. The same kind of people that will be called to live in and make an ancap society work.

But I am of course.

An ancap would tell you that states create inherit inefficiency by being based on a structure of laws, regulations, and processes that need to change with the times for it to change, and it may not be able to keep up with the demand of the people. It's important to remember that the basis of ancap thought is that people will protect themselves in a stateless society through market-driven organizations and the fundamental belief that humans want to cooperate with each other, not kill each other. Of course, there are market externalities that in an ancap society have a much higher risk of becoming permanently scarce or simply exhausted by the time the market deems them profitable enough to begin commercializing.

>protect themselves in a stateless society through market-driven organizations
Hired militias don't seem to be the ideal protection force.
I would also like to know how an ancap society will provide healthcare. Regulate global trade, deal with natural disaster etc. Those things generally aren't profitable therefore hard to be market regulated.

I have just the place for (You).
>run by a corporation
>entire country is private property

being an anarchocapitalist in latam is like being a jew in the NSDAP

I unironically support the idea of corporate states as long as
>the citizenship contract isn't forced on you by conquest or place of birth
>the citizenship contract can be cancel at will (even if there are cancellation fees)
A competitive market of states is literally eutopia. Socialists can go live in Ikeastan, where high subscription fees (aka taxes) fund generous public services.

Also, on your specific case it was run by a corporation that
>got all it's power from the (unelected) head of a state, and was essentially just a colony
>raised funds by fraud, violation of the NAP
>forced itself on natives who didn't wish to be governed, violation of the NAP

fedora meme ideology dreamt up by people with no life experience or understanding of human societies