Tell me Sup Forums, what took a bigger blow, the #NeverTrump movement...

Tell me Sup Forums, what took a bigger blow, the #NeverTrump movement, or Rand Paul's credibility among moderate Republicans?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YtueGskYjxM
youtube.com/watch?v=wVwtBsmdAGk
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Rand stated from the very beginning that he would support the Republican nominee, no matter who it was. He did the same when Romney won the nomination back in 2012.

Rand is finally realizing that a Countries demographics determine its destiny.

You see socialist government in central/South America and that's what you'll get here if you don't stop it

Gay

He signed a pledge then honoured that pledge. His credibility is much higher than Cruz's or Jeb!'s.

I don't think anyone cares about Republicans saying they support Donald Trump because of the nomination pledge they took. It's not like you're saying you really like Trump and agree with everything he stands for. It just means you're not a liar basically. I have a much worse opinion of all the GOP candidates saying they don't support Trump since they all literally promised they would support the nominee no matter who it ended up being. That's fucking bullshit that they're making exceptions for Trump, exact opposite of what that pledge is for.

I would say the nevertrump movement.

They got butthurt about Trump pledging to support the nominee, then they all break the pledge when they lose.

This just shows how weak the establishment really is. I would say Rand had a fair amount of popularity.

Trump is the textbook definition of a moderate.

I'm surprised he didn't support Trump sooner. A libertarian who doesn't follow through on a pledge or contract belongs in the trash.

I have to say #NeverTrump. They got shit-blasted at every turn. I'm surprised Bill Kristol hasn't killed himself out of shame yet. Paulberg never had any real credibility in the first place.

That's really big of Rand Paul.

Takes a big man to follow through on commitments like this.

Why would his credibility suffer from keeping his word?
That's pure retardation OP

What's the big deal? When Ron and Rand Paul say they are going to do something, they stick to that.

He signed a pledge, he is sticking to it. This is silly to even discuss.

>I'm surprised Bill Kristol hasn't killed himself out of shame yet.

He's probably waiting to see how the general election turns out. If Trump loses by a landslide then he can smugly claim he told everyone so. If Trump wins and goes on to genuinely make the country great again then a lot of people like him should probably start putting slugs in their skulls.

>aligns himself with libertarianism on certain issues
>most libertarians hate Trump
>Rand supports Trump

It's not rocket science user

rand BIG

>most libertarians hate Trump
Are most libertarians autistic?

If I violate the constitution, will you die??

NeverTrump. Hardly anyone knows or gives a shit about Randlet honoring his pledge. NeverTrumpers are going to be cursed to hell the next four years if they result in Hillary winning.

>Rand Paul's credibility among moderate Republicans
Are "moderate Republicans" anything like "moderate rebels"? And didn't they already dislike Paul for being immoderate?

No but it will be extremely painful

i would be extremely triggered

Well, Austin Petersen got booed at the libertarian convention this year for saying you shouldn't be allowed to sell heroin to a five year old. so the number is certainly more than zero sadly.

Considering the Never Trump crowd are depending on Republicans switching over to vote Liberatarian, this is a big blow to their movement.

Well, it slightly raises my opinion of Rand that he'd stand by his word even if he doesn't agree with Trump on everything. That's more than you can expect of most politicians these days.

4 u

you're a big guy

Rand's a bro, even after he was BTFO by Trump.

Rand would have been the best president we could have. Glad he did this, what a stand up guy.

Pretty much, it's a sad truth that some libertarians haven't accepted yet, there will be no liberty in a non white socialist society.

Honestly, libertarians are just virtue signalling cuckholds. I don't get why anybody would be a libertarian in this day in age, and not either a pale-conservative or nationalist. Libertarians are ladder rung just about godless liberals.

>Give word to support nominee
>Fulfill word
>People shame you for it

What a sad day when people's words are expected to be broken when things get hard.

for america

>>most libertarians hate Trump

Most libertarians now are the infowars type, and alex jones is all for trump.

Hillary Clinton's poll numbers.

I don't see him taking a hit. He's just honoring his pledge unlike Rato.

>stealth trump.webm

Kek

trump could have BTFO rand forever but he just said rand's hair looked dumb

Sup Forums

I'd say that most libertarians are realists enough to know that only Trump and Hillary have a chance, and Hillary is the literal embodiment of anti-libertarianism.

also we should give up our guns

For one, he's holding up that pledge and two, he's being smart, supporting Trump and helping keep the GOP united instead of throwing a bitchfit and trying to stop Trump (which helps Hillary in the long run, but I guess cuckservatives don't actually care about that).

Trump is a moderate republican you dit

>big man

For you

that's why Gary Johnson and Weld are anti=gun

I'm a right libertarian. Meaning I'm small government in pretty much every issue except for those pertaining to national identity, so borders and domestic policy. Social, economic, military, environmental, and science- I say deregulate and let go

Nah you're a dumbass. If you think Libertarians can't recognize the fact that the left has systematically picked apart free speech and Trump is a massive middle finger to that then you're a fucking blind dumbass.

but ron paul is not

he gained some respect from him, few in politics actually respects their commitments.

>socialist government in central/South America

That would be difficult because one of the main pillars of left movements here were anti-americanism, don't know how that would work in America, and some kind of (although perverted) nationalism. Some of them even religious. A socialist America would be something more akin to European socialdemocracy, commie and neoliberal, commie and degenerate.
Don't let that happen.

youtube.com/watch?v=YtueGskYjxM
youtube.com/watch?v=wVwtBsmdAGk

I'm surprised libertarians aren't the first to realize this. They're the only peoples who demand that people act virtuously while at the same time lash out against religion, the only know mechanism that enables people to behave virtuously passed many generations. But no, instead libertarians not only based the only mechanism that enables virtue, but in turn provide nothing else, no alternative that could possible render society more virtuous to enable libertarianism.

>implying I'm a libertarian
>implying libertarians aren't aware of this

never said libertarians had it all figured out. they're just as dense as the left for vehemently opposing Trump, especially after nominating Johnson.

He looks worse for wear than at the start of this election season.

Also, Maduro is a fucking retard, but remember he's anti-stablishment, just like Trump seems to be. Some of his core ideas, like America first, anti globalism, anti free trade, aren't that different from populist leaders in the region. Fuck, even the fucking CIA is against him (that Evan Mcmullin '''''''''ex'''''CIA agent guy wtf).
But in this case he seems genuine, smart, and a reflection of the true American values.

>or Rand Paul's credibility among moderate Republicans