Why do Americans feel they *need* to own a tactical strategic assault weapon...

Why do Americans feel they *need* to own a tactical strategic assault weapon? Do they genuinely reason that their *desire* to own a lethal assault weapon equipped with armour-piercing rounds overrides the right of their compatriots to feel safe in public spaces?

so that they could defend themselves against the evil government's tanks, f-35 and helicopters when it will come to take away their freedom

Don't forget, the industries that in the case of real rebellion/revolution will give ammunitions to the governement instead of the people.

The thing is there are too many weapons in the US now. If everyone around you has his AR-15, you would also want one, in case of. This is a vicious circle and they are completely fucked.

For """home""" protection.
Or my personal favorite. When BIG GOVERNMENT run by (((THEM))) rises up, it's up to armed militias and armed civilians to TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK.

Good

for self defence duh...

A. It's not called the Bill of Needs it's called the Bill of Rights
B. Nowhere in that Bill of Rights does it say that pussies and faggots have a right to not be scared of inanimate objects.
C. Go fuck yourself you fucking homo
D. SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED

*shoots you*

Unrelated, but can you explain to me the French concept of liberté? I have heard that the French have a different concept of it than the Americans.

If people want to feel safe they should carry a gun

>Unrelated, but can you explain to me the French concept of liberté? I have heard that the French have a different concept of it than the Americans

>tens of thousands of niggers and spics practice self removal every year
>a statistically insignificant number of kids get killed every couple of years occasionally, like recently, jewish children and therefore the future destroyers of the nation
>fucked
Nah

>tactical strategic assault weapon
You've never seen one. Let your merchant ally educate you

Can this meme fucking die already?
You can't kill a tank or a drone with a bullet but you can kill the people at the factory that produces them, and you can kill the drivers of the trucks that supply them
If the scenario that the 2nd amendment is designed to prevent actually played out, it would be far from a conventional war

I'm almost positive there's more guns than people in this country.

If people want to be safe they should fuck off. This country is for people who want to be free, not people who want to be safe. It's no coincidence that those who selfishly strive for the latter are always the ones spending every waking moment trying to make the former impossible.

Not an assault weapon. There's no shoulder thing that goes up.

>Americans feel they *need* to own a tactical strategic assault weapon
IMAGINE MY SHOCK

Political freedom for Americans is the absence of constraints, political liberté for French is autonomy and independence, for us you can be totally free even with the laws, for the Americans it's a trade off

I'd say that the concept of "liberté" here is more to be able to live tour life and have the freedom to do so, and that rules don't take freedom but give freedom.
Example, if we outrule guns, no one in theory has guns but the governement, so if 99% of the population don't have guns, mortal attacks are reduced and you are more free because, guess what, more provability of living and choosing.

From what I know, there your concept of freedom is no rules and being able to do anything and that you masturbate thinking in a document that was made 400 years ago when the world was very different.

>of more than 10 rounds
Shit don't some Glocks have 15 rounds in the stock mag?

If a government has an absolute monopoly on weapons it means they can do whatever the fuck they want
What you're describing there is safety, as in """freedom""" from danger
Far from actual liberty

some have 17

You realize you're a disconnected, insane retard and a hypocrite right?

I'm defending the 2nd amendment you retard

We came from a country ruled by a despot. The 2nd amendment is intended to keep the civilian population armed in case A: foreign armies try to invade US soil, or B: the current government starts turning against the its citizens.

Well guess what you twat, here the governement is shaped by its citizens, sometging that comes with the "liberté" concept is that your liberté is fragile and that people should attack and defend their freedoms, and their governement, thus this concept was one of the factors that led to the 1789 revolution.
It works here, where maybe we have our problems, but freedom is given and people enjoy their life, can you say the same about your country?

You can’t exactly set an example

What is this bait? A semi-automatic is not an assault rifle even if it looks "scary". Assault rifles are already incredibly hard to get here.

Because I think we shouldn't wipe our ass with the Bill or Rights just because a bunch of socialist, gibs seeking wetbacks waddled their fat asses over to a country that doesn't belong to them and then try to take the native population's rights? Yeah fuck me then.

And? So am I faggot. Not every post is criticism you illiterate fucktard.

Well enjoy your freedom, your lack of healthcare, but hey, the governement don't limit my options of healthcare, enjoy your Internet, where hey, because rules are bad and governement shouldn't limit, you have a shitty network.

Why do you feel the need to surrender everything to the government, including your own security?

I don't understand why you keep repeating this, you have guns because you wan't it and there is nothing wrong about it.

Yes i can, gangs and drug cartels hold a monopoly on violence and weapons so they can do whatever the fuck they want in their territory and the common folk can't do shit about that
>government being shaped by the people
>ever
I'm sure that's why your government listens to you so intently when you say you don't want any more africans to come in
>can you say the same about your country?
No, that's why i need my guns

>so that they could defend themselves against the evil government's tanks, f-35 and helicopters when it will come to take away their freedom
>Guerillas don't exist
>American colonial militia armed with cannons didn't steal British artillery and use it to force the British military from Boston.

>Slopes without tanks, planes and ships didn't kill enough Americans in S.A. to force America to pull out of Vietnam
I could go on but your probably to ignorant to get it.

Well, you are an individual, and you are obliged to live in a social group to survive, but because you are in a group, if anyone had to do what they want, we wpuld all be dead so we surrender some rights to the governement to have more freedom than the freedom we would have alone.

Who shit in your cereal this morning?

Different amerifat, just got here. Yeah that's pretty much the real reason though, if the government DID turn rogue most of our population is too pussified to do anything about it.

You keep using the word "freedom" when you actually mean "safety" or "quality of life"

Anyway pic related is a nice illustration that explains why an armed citizenry is necessary for real freedom

>your probably to ignorant
*You're probably too ignorant
FML

do you trust your life to your goverment?
if a terrorist / killer / lunatic is at your door the police won't teleport to save you

Except I do have healthcare, healthcare that's significantly better than yours for which I pay next to nothing.

Or are you suggesting that I should somehow feel pity for the chronically lazy that refuse to work for a living?

To stop dem rubbers and to defend muh frerdurbs

>Surrendering the freedom of self-defense to the government means we are more free
Frenchie, I think I now understand why your country is in the mess it currently is.
Old countries like you & our unfortunately severley retarded neighbour do not have the Rebellious Spirit that still lives within Young Countries like us or America.

>tactical semiauto strategic 50cal fully automatic assault military weapon

???
ROI has some of the most restrictive firearm legislation in the world

Guns are not the problem, Americans are.
Look at Switzerland and Finland, they all have got pistols, rifles, even assault guns. - and nothing happens.

Yea, imagine random dudes in the woods fighting US Military tanks and aircraft with just rifles and makeshift bombs...

>you will never furiously charge into battle wielding the almighty Cuntbuster 8000

Gun control was a mistake

There's an IRA chapter here in Texas for some reason. Dunno why but they grow some pretty amazing weed.

>Guns are not the problem, Americans are.
It's actually, almost entirely, the problem of two dark skinned groups of "Americans."

Fickmaschinenjude, bitte!

Do you know how common guns are here?

Mutt.

Yes and your guns have put an end to the violence instead of just making it works
>muh individualism
>Africans to come in
What the fuck are you talking about?
Having more civilian guns doesn’t change anything
Maybe in your cunt your army can be overthrown by armed peasants but in real countries it doesn’t work like that
And we have the right to have firearms it’s just stupid to think that it goes so far as to apply to military gear
You are confusing freedom with deubachery

No civilian army has ever won a war against the United States Military

Faggot

Yeah but they are very restrictive when you buy ammunition.
What is real freedom?
Also, are the americans more free than french are, I seriously doubt it.
Well, pay for the lazy, the day your life will take a real dark turn, we will see if you keep that mentality. I don't doubt that there are people who are fucking lazy pricks but they aren't the core of the problem.

Latinos and blacks?
The weapons are readily available so that citizens can defend themselves against the state and form civil defence forces.
Then blacks and Latinos have armed themselves with easily available weapons; now the decent people have to upgrade to defend themselves.
Almost like a self-fulfilling prophecy, isn't it?

Worst*
Fuck my phone

>HURRR IM WHITE

Imagine armed militias fighting a large organized state

I'm sure the US military personnel would be perfectly happy to indiscriminately slaughter civilians no issues because they are just robots

He's trying to gain (you)s using the easiest method possible, and you're handing them to him...

>what is michoacan
In your own country armed citizens threw the cartels out of their state

Guns act as a deterrent, if the government fears an armed revolt, they won't go around ignoring the will of the people, like europe did with the migrants.
See

You're Vietnamese, you should know that the US military actually DOES slaughter people when ordered to.

Guess it didn't work great for y'all eh? Sorry about the birth defects tho

It was what he was fucking saying.

Daily reminder that only fascism can be the answer.

The problem in the US is that the government is more than happy to take away your freedom and let you keep your guns (but making it so that if you have a gun you're on some watchlist and can be quietly dealt with if needed)
It's like what they do in South Africa, if things ever went hot there many whites would be rounded up before they even knew what was going on

>americans more free than the french
I don't know enough about french law to say exactly how much more freedom americans have, but seeing as you're in the EU, i would say yes, yes they are more free than you

And real freedom is being solely responsible for as many aspects of your lif as possible, like safety, food, housing.
And not having the government have to take care of all of that shit

I'm American

>I don't doubt that there are people who are fucking lazy pricks but they aren't the core of the problem.
Well they certainly aren't my fucking problem. If they want healthcare they can get a job.

Bring us back some pho

And they complied with the rules settled by the army anyway. The army can come any day ans take those away and has done it before
And I think you didn’t read guns are allowed here. We have a right to own them, I legally own one myself
That doesn’t mean I get to override others right to not want a gun or see a gun
Liberties have limits, again I tell you you’re confusing liberty with deubachery and if you really think you or an American has more freedom than a French or a Spaniard Just because of guns you are retarded

Not phó but close

kindly goosestep back to Sup Forums

You are the perfect example of why you disgusting parasites need to get the fuck out of this country.
>it's stupid that people should have their rights!
Die you nigger

I'd say real freedom is having choices, the more choices, the "freeer".
So yo have more choices, the law has to be there to protect. Maybe in your 3rd world shithole the law can't help you and in that case, you are right to have the right to defend yourself. But in a civilised country, why, you are already very well protected, example, per population the USA has more deaths than France, is you are not alive, you cannot be free, so I repeat, (the EU protects more than limits) are the Americans more free?

>the army can come take our guns and oppress us
>this is a good thing
Jesus christ mexico i didn't know it was that bad over there
And just so you know, your gun laws are so fucking shit that they might as well be banned, you have 1 (one) government owned gun store in the while country and that's the only place to get one legally
Fucking ridiculous

Why are all of the school shooters white then?

I'm jealous, eating fast garbage tonight. Better enjoy the hell out of it

And those who have genetoc problems, health problems, who cannot work. They can go die and fuck themselves?

Holy fucking shit the mental gymnastics with this retard.

No you stupid faggot: having less negative liberties, by fucking definition, means you are less free.

> the more choices the freer
Right
So why don't you have the choice of protecting yourself vs letting the police do it?
Why don't you have the choice of not paying ridiculous taxes for state services and use private services instead?
Why don't you have the choice of expressing yourself without being arrested for hate speech?
Safety is not freedom and giving up your weapons actually decreases your choices

Ah yes, good old white man Nikolas De Jesus Cruz. How could I forget?

And school shootings are statistically irrelevant, niggers and spics slaughtering each other in the tens of thousands every year is not.

So I have a gun, all have guns, they can shoot me and I can shoot them
So guns outruled, I have a lesser probability of getting killed and killing.

If I am fucking dead, how can I exert my rights?

Guess what idiot, they get free fucking healthcare then, it's called Medicaid. Maybe you should learn at least something about what the fuck you're talking about before you start spewing shit out of your mouth next time.

And yet it’s the children’s deaths that drives legislation
Liberals and conservatives don’t care about nonwhites killing each other

>being a woman in this day and age with no gun
hi I'm an easy target please rape and/or murder me in the woods.

>tactical strategic

If someone attacks you, and you're unarmed, that certainly diminishes your choices doesn't it?
Now consider this:
The government will always have guns
Criminals will always have guns (or other weapons)
You don't have guns
So what if any of the other two chooses to attack you
How will you defend yourself?

And by popular demand many people want that thing closed btw
Of course we know violence, you really think we are eager to create more with guns?
We had 100 years or civil war and we would like to be civilised now
Every time a politician has proposed relaxing the gun laws he gets btfo
The campaigns of voluntary disarmament are very successful
And if you gave me or any Mexican a choice of who to be like France or the US, it would be an obvious answer

Rights are for the living you fucking child. Fact - an American has more negative liberties than a frog which leads us to..Fact - an American is more free than a frog.

This is not a subjective exercise you brainwashed, communist, retard. Go read John Locke.

>arguing with a cheese-eating surrender monkey
repeat after me: "You're welcome"

Why do you refuse to protect the right of someone to not get shot?

>voluntary disarmament is very successful
You absolute mental patient
Im sure the cartels are voluntarily giving up their guns, right?
Fucking idiot
The government is a tool of the cartels and they're disarming you so you can't do anything about it!
Jesus christ the absolute state of mexico

Neither do I. I don't give a fuck about the dead kids either, the rights of the people are far more important than the lives of all of us, much less the statistically insignificant lives of a couple dozen kids.

We do. It's against the law to shoot people who don't deserve to get shot.

Next stupid non-point please.