Jon Snow executes a harmless mutineer who already gave up and swore to follow him

>Jon Snow executes a harmless mutineer who already gave up and swore to follow him

>nobody bats an eyelash

>Dany executes the leader of enemy soldiers who wouldn't surrender

>white males piss themselves and get triggered

what did the fragile white male audience mean by this?

big difference between executing some random landless night's watch man vs. a great house that has been in power for thousands of years

It's entirely in the manner of death. If you can't tell the difference between beheading and death by dragonfire in a world where dragonfire is akin to nuclear weapons, you probably are too dim to watch the show.

There's not a single execution in this show that Game of Thrones fans have smiled at. Only fake fans who like Seasons 5, 6, and 7 think that beheadings are something to truly cheer for. This isn't good vs evil it's all evil vs evil.

>what did the fragile white male audience mean by this?

>you probably are too dim to watch the show.

Well, that's a-given.

>great house waaah

who cares he was an enemy who didn't accept surrender. they even shot a ballista and arrows at Dany not even 30 minutes ago. they should be glad they even had a chance to live

>Stannis executes people with fire

nah it's just fragile white males

>trying to pretend mainstream show is complex because he's a butthurt white male

lol

>Stannis executes people with fire
Fire =/= Dragonfire. Plus, the show framed him as bad for executing people with fire (just as it frames Daenerys as bad for executing people with dragonfire).

>harmless mutineer


What did he mean by this?

>b-but dragonfire!

they disintegrated in 3 seconds. it means nothing. you triggered autists are reaching for straws.

>Tyrion uses wildfire for mass murder which it worse
>nah that's okay too

face it, you're only problem is a female handing out the BTFOs because you white males are threatened

>who cares
Everyone except for Dany?
>he was an enemy who was attacking Dany
She's the one who attacked them.

Did you fall on your head?

It's symbolic, and the other characters on the show call Dany out on it in the same episode.

I didn't think Tyrion's use of wildfire was okay because I root for the Mannis, and watch the episode again--neither does he. He's disgusted by the destruction he's wrought. Besides--he used it in battle, not to execute someone.

>halfwit writers slap user in the face with the conclusion that Dany's action was morally questionable not once but TWICE yet user still doesn't get it
You're a fanboy get over and stopping spamming this thread.

enemy combatant is an enemy combatant

>She's the one who attacked them.
after they killed her only ally in westeros and burned her fleet

christ you white male apologists are so retarded

>them lannister whiteys are good boys they didn't do nuffin

LOL

By virtue of them no longer being in combat, the Tarly's were no longer combatants.

I know you're baiting, but damn.

>Tarly: I will not stop fighting you

he asked for it :^)

Stannis revival when

Next season, check the leaks. D&D are truly /ourguys/

being treated like surrendered combatants involves y'know actual surrendering

>mutineer
>by definition used to follow you, then went against you
>loses, so swears to follow you again
>mutineer

Fucking idiot you can't trust a mutineer ever. He wasn't an enemy, he was a traitor. Have to kill him.