What is Sup Forumss view on peaceful parenting? In my opinion spanking is for low IQ savages

What is Sup Forumss view on peaceful parenting? In my opinion spanking is for low IQ savages.

No its not.

Its a good form of punishment if done correctly.

Just a swat on the butt is all it takes.

That depends on what you mean by "peaceful." If you're one of those parents that doesn't discipline their child and lets them do whatever the hell they want, (like throwing a fit in the grocery store because they didn't get a fucking doughnut,) then do the rest of the world a favor now and put two bullets in the back of your head.

Do you swat adults who's actions you don't like? If not, why would you do this to your child?

It sounds like you're not intelligent enough to discipline your child without the use of force.

>Do you swat adults who's actions you don't like? If not, why would you do this to your child?

Because adults have already learned what's socially acceptable or not. Children are not adults.

This

You're more than welcome to try and reason with a six year old, kissless beta faggot.

So you are saying that you can't tell children what is socially acceptable or not. Nor can you teach them the difference between right and wrong from non violent parenting techniques or leading by example.

This.

Also yes if an adult is acting unacceptable and fails to be reasoned with then yes I will give him a swat right across his doom.

I could. If the 6 year old is a relatively intelligent child and isn't autistic, I could easily do that. Now if the 6 year old is very stupid and low IQ, I could see why you would need to parent your children that way

A good parent makes his children behave without spanking. He commands respect and teaches him manners from an early age.

Spanking is a last resort solution and not a very effective one.

My parents never spanked me and I have never disrespected them or misbehaved in public. Same goes for most people I know.

>inb4 "hurr durr fuck off SJW I was spanked as a kid and turned out fine, little kids are shitheads, I know this because I was an insufferable brat when a small kid and my parents had to beat me to make me behave"

>adults have learned what's socially acceptable or not
Fucking bullshit, I see way more adults misbehaving in public than kids.
Some adults are genuinely autistic who don't understand social situations.

Awe, so we should live in a society where we are able to physically assault those whose actions we deem unacceptable. Tell me, if a group of Black gentlemen attacks a Donald Trump supporter because they are presumably inciting racism, would you be fine with that?

Tip that fedora harder.

My point exactly. If you want to teach your child how to behave in a civilized society, you will practice with them at an early age. A child who is misbehaving just doen't know that they are misbehaving. Spanking doesn't teach you why something is wrong, but that something is wrong without reasoning behind it. It's rather lazy to resort to hitting your children as well

Not an argument

>There's literally no difference in reasoning, experience, and logic between children and adults

Wtf I'm a boomer now. Really made me think.

t. Numale

It's about principle. Do you believe it's alright to hit someone because their children and not adults? To me that sounds very cowardly

Spanking doesn't equal hitting, beta.

So why would it be socially unacceptable to spank anyone but your own child? Hmm?

Spanking isnt the same as beating up a child user.

Because it's none of your damn business how other people raise their kids. I have to go drink the rest of my scotch and bang my wife because my two well-behaved and disciplined kids are in bed. Have fun wanking to tentacle porn in your moms basement, faggot. Keep living in your fantasy world.

the sjws were not spanked

/thread

I'd rather raise a dick than a pussy. Pussies get fucked by dicks.
Ideally, I think the mother should be the one to do the spankings. The dad should be the big dog that just has to go "WOOF" to make the little shits fall in line.

>Because adults have already learned what's socially acceptable or not.

Do you speak to many people on a daily basis?

I think I agree with the notion that spanking is not optimal for raising children but equating it to child abuse even when it's a one off episode is insane like in Norway.

>In my opinion spanking is for low IQ savages
In my opinion you're a fucking faggot. When your children or wife misbehave you are supposed to spank them.
>Do you swat adults who's actions you don't like?
When my wife misbehaves I spank her the same way I would my daughters; panties down, skirt up, across my lap to take her swats.

You think they're well behaved, but they're probably out doing drugs and your wife probably lacks virtues if she would be with a man who spanks children

You sound savage. I would never spank a female adult without first getting her permission to do so.

>or wife
Is it wrong that I kinda want a girl who's into that?

In my anecdotal experience, parents who spank their kids have extremely low iqs, shit jobs and emotional disorders.

>You sound savage
Because only a savage would keep his wife under control, huh? When she gets hysterical and acting stupid you can't just let her be like that.
>getting someone's permission
>to discipline them
Fucking hell, man, pull yourself together.
She's not supposed to be into it. It's a punishment.

YOURE A FUCKING FAGGOT AND I FUCKING HATE YOU
I KNOW EXACTLY WHAT KIND OF FAGGOT VIRGIN YOU ARE
KINDLY KYS

Hitting a child does not do very much to teach them, beyond basic cause and effect.
>"If I do X I will be spanked."
Physical harm is a punishment, not a teaching tool. If a child genuinely does not understand that their behavior is wrong, they can be taught. If a child deliberately disobeys their parent's rules, then it's a different story. That's not to say that every time a kid acts out you need to smack them, but if they keep repeating the same behaviors, deliberately disobeying you, then it might be time to use physical punishment as a means of deterrent. The kid's not going to learn anything from a spanking, other than the fact that a particular behavior has a direct consequence. This is common sense.

>She's not supposed to be into it. It's a punishment.
I mean, it doesn't have to be.
There's more than one way to settle a dispute, yeah?

This desu
Though a proper definition of "spanking" should be given. Do you mean a corrective swat or random pissed off bruising?

So if a child who understands that what they are doing is wrong repeatedly does wrong, then as punishment you should spank them.

My question would be why do they continue to do wrong? Are their role models people who do wrong themselves yet say "Do as I say not as I do"?

You could just refuse to feed them if their actions are that bad.

>You could just refuse to feed them if their actions are that bad
Wait, so, spanking is bad but starving your child is okay? That's a pretty weird fucked up view.

>be me
>little shit of a 6 or 7 year old
>make a scene in a quiet library because I wanted a dinosaur book that was already checked out and I'm all that matters in the world
>mom is ex military served in gulf war
>mom doesn't put up with this kind of shit
>mom grabs my arm with a grip tighter than harambe
>drags me out of the library puts me in the car
>silentridehomemeansshitscoming.jpeg
>get home mom doesn't even turn off car
>pulls me out and take me inside
>takes out one of dads fat belts
>wips me three times on the ass with that shit. Snot and tears flying everywhere
>never pulled shit like that again

Your own anecdotes don't mean shit user, corporeal punishment was one of the best things that ever happened to me. It teaches discipline and forces you to realize the fundamental truths of society, the first of which is no one gives a shit about you and the second is that no one owes you anything.

I was a horrible little asshole until my dad started spanking me.

The child may choose to disobey you because it benefits them. In a child's mind the reward often outweighs the risk, despite knowing that their behavior will be punished.

Obviously you wouldn't starve them to death. You can give them only carrots and lettuce to eat. You're not initiating force by withholding certain goods

You seem to have an emotional connection to being spanked. I also don't use anecdotes. There is scientific proof that shows that spanking is harmful to a child's development. I hope you two didn't grow up to be drug users or violent individuals.

Some Mexican coworkers use to jokingly notice how white kids seem to behave and Mexican parents need to have their kids on a leash at the store. They couldn't understand way.

Actually it was because of neglect. Due to "le stronk independent career womyn" shit, the kids go very little attention from their parents and were left in the daycares, because daycares are usually crowded as fuck with a small amount of toys and resources and the staff didn't give a shit, they started doing tantrums for attentions and the rest is history.

threadly reminder that niggers spank their kids more than anyone else
spanking is nigger-tier parenting at its finest

>implying there aren't other ways to discipline people besides nignog tier shit

Kill yourself subhuman scum, how the fuck can you call yourself white? I get that niggers and retards need to get whacked but no self respecting ubermensch would go to such savagery.

I do have a small emotional connection but you think that's a bad thing for some reason. Excessive spanking is bad I'll agree but a show of force to turn the child in the right direction even against his will is detrimental short term but will absolutely benefit him in the long run. Personally I went from being a little shit who never cared to a straight A and B college student because of the persistence of my parents, which yes included punishment. But my childhood included far more love than punishment which is what your missing here if you want to form a well behaved child.

I don't hit the people I love. I negotiate. But if that's how you operate make sure to give your mom a "right there fred!" for me.

Do you even know what kids are like? Also chief white males were beating their kids since the beginning.

I babysitted for extra money a lot. I found that giving incentives to better their behavior (toys, better food, etc) and giving non physical penalties for bad behavior (taking toys away, giving the kid's least favorite food) works better in the long term than spanking. If your kid is making a big tantrum scene in public then yea, spank him/her to shut the fuck up for the moment. But in the long run it's better to not spank.

Spanking is a last resort, not a go to.

Frankly I don't know. I'm not a parent. It would be nice to think that parenting can be done just fine without corporal punishment, but at the same time it stinks of wishful thinking rooted in liberal ideology. By the way, the argument that corporal punishment should not be used on children because 'would you use it on adults?' will not work: Singapore has corporal punishment of adults and it works well for them. Perhaps if we caned niggers on the streets we'd have less crime, and it's certainly cheaper than paying for their stay in prison.

Spanking your kid != beating your kid

A spank isn't going to cause any real harm, and is effective as punishment up to a certain age.