No NATO, no allies, no nuclear forces, who wins?

No NATO, no allies, no nuclear forces, who wins?

Attached: 080_028__russianbritishflag_1406883525_standard.jpg (850x242, 46K)

Russia crushes you and it wouldn't even be close

china

the uk because they have nato, lots of allies and nuclear weapons

The jews, as in every other major war

Is that true though?

Russia, but not easily. We'd give them a fair fight. We're still a relatively powerful nation, despite what the retards on Sup Forums say.

>How to kill Russia
>Step one: Blockade the Sound.
Congratulations you have now crippled Russian economic engine and brought the nation to its knees.

Russia of course.
I want to see how russia beat Britain down and stupid named aircraft carrier sinking.

no one

This

Attached: 1520975325365.png (246x205, 12K)

I really feel sorry for Brits right now. First the Chinese cucked them by brutally pacifying protests in Hong-Kong and telling Theresa to bugger off, and now Russians openly slaughter people on their own soil. Call me delusional, but after two world wars I believe Britain has a positive role on the world's stage to play.

>inb4 Yalta there was nothing they could do

how is this even a question?

Attached: file.png (840x619, 728K)

just by population, yes

I don't understand what you people want with Hong Kong. We had no mandate to hold onto it any longer than we did, if we'd just ignored that you'd be screeching about the eternal anglo to the end of time

Attached: 146113762260167.png (1533x961, 250K)

How can Russia compete with Britain's unparalleled ramp technology?

Attached: 1200px-HMS_Queen_Elizabeth_conducts_vital_system_tests_off_the_coast_of_Scotland_MOD_45162795.jpg (1200x800, 226K)

was that the piece of shit that stopped working because windows xp crashed?

>No NATO, no allies, no nuclear forces, who wins?
your meme island would be crushed in mere seconds

russia has the hardware and experience from georgia, ukraine and syria

uk relies too heavily on american logistics and hardware to get anything done by themselves

>russia has the hardware and experience from georgia, ukraine and syria
I'd love to see them try and get their hardware onto an island, mate.

The UK are cucks. Half of them are Pakis, the other half - niggers.

Russia
Or just stop Estonia from selling them vodka

true based slav

What if Russia just released its AIDS infected tigers to wage guerilla warfare?

>weaponised AIDS
t.CIA

the finnish furries will ragefuck them to death

Have an angry scotsman banter them for a few months while they are in the push up position

Army =/= armed forces

You've been told this before, you ignorant boxhead cunt.

two afternoons then

> We're still a relatively powerful nation, despite what the retards on Sup Forums say.

Group of 5 officers cant even handle a single sandnigger and you are implying that you'd even stand a chance against the slavic Übermensch, ps. Make sure your militairy is armed with something sharper than a butter knife

Russia's army is hopelessly outdated, whereas we have one of only three Blue Water Navies in the world.
Britain is better suited to combat operations in fucking Thailand than Russia is for army operations in even Poland. There's a reason why Russia was desperate for French Mistrals, but nobody outside of the Third World buys Russian weapons.

You're an absolute spanner

Attached: 1519344656560.png (980x742, 634K)

WTF are you blabbering on about, Cuckoofag?


>Russia's army is hopelessly outdated
Personnel and tank-wise they piss all over us in sheer numbers, so pipe down.

no one wants to buy british shit

Attached: file.png (345x329, 22K)

unambiguously Russia. Turkey vs UK would be a very interesting match though.

USA>China=Japan>Russia >UK=Turkey>France>Germany

it's not like they're modernizing their military or something

Attached: a1XP3eG_700b_v1.jpg (700x1347, 182K)

so what's the consensus then? a stalemate because
)russians don't have the navy to overwhelm brits and roll in with tanks and flesh (+ their current state of army is laughing stock of the whole world)
)brits could overwhelm the ruskies in naval warfare, but lack the heavy machinery and flesh to obliterate russia totally and probably wouldn't even want to
?

Most likely Russians. Under your conditions it will turn into war of attrition where Russian 3rd world, natural resources export oriented economy would do better than your soficticated high income economy that need stable environment, predictability and trus of investors.

Russia has shit navy, Brits would block the North sea and crush the ruskis

That anyone thinks Russia's crap box armed forces wouldn't dilapidate against any NATO power is a serious testament to the strength of their state propaganda.

>China=Japan
unambiguously kill kys yourself

Clearly they do, or can't you read your own fucking image?

I don't wanna Russian and UK go to war because then we can't have fun on Sup Forums anymore

Attached: cc1.jpg (619x453, 26K)

oh shit

Attached: file.png (856x636, 121K)

Russians dont have enough power projection without their nukes to crush bong islands.

their state propagande isn't even directed outwards. it's imho an inward turned hallucinogen to keep the people "happy" while everything fucking crumbles faster than an african shack

Once our ships and planes took naval and air superiority, we could just sit on the coast, take pops at them, and bomb their cities to rubble.

Russia would zerg rush them with endless waves of soldiers and Russia is way too big for the UK to hold onto.
Maybe Russia could also fund a radical Scottish separatist group as well or arm the Muslims.

britains own military admits that their army wouldn't stand a chance against russia you cringy wannabe armchair general

Against the entire NATO forces, yeah. Individually, though. There's only the US you can guarantee would wipe the floor with them

Russians have the best long range rockets and the best AA weapons.
And as ukraine shows, they are capable of implementing flexible warfare tactics.

pmuch. considering the narrow streak of sea that they need to unleash a realistic attack on british isles through danish waters... it's a fucking bottleneck of DEATH for them and they are not even prominent in other waters to keep the other powers in check... it's a losing battle for them to begin with

ARMY, you fucking thick cunt.

So what is your navy planning on doing against submarines?

british posters are so delusional, it's pathetic

Attached: file.png (1055x781, 964K)

Fight them.

Sup Forums has taught you well

The British would win at sea but they would be unable to pursue anything else, it would just end in a boring naval blockade of the Baltic, as th Russians would be unable to carry out land or offensive air operations, because of the british having naval superiority and being an island, but the UK would lack the planes and ground forces to attempt anything offensive in air or on land.

Destroy them with our submarines, probably.

you know what's even more pathetic? that russians have such a shit country they flee to germany of all fucking places and shill for mother russia while they would never return to that shithole

Yes, ARMY. Where exactly do you think our armies would fight exactly, you deranged third world mouth-breather?

>implying some ships can win against a bigger number of submarines

pic related

Attached: file.png (639x943, 378K)

We could just starve them to death though.

I said 'fight', not 'win'. Learn to read.

an overwhelming enemy can be brought to its knees by a smart yet small opponent. proved a million times through out history. fuck... even estonia has btfo-d russia in a world war...

Lmao

Brits would trash Russia's navy and probably beat them in the air too. Theres no way for Russia to really get close to UK.

your whole military is inferior, see even your own military chiefs admit it

Except with their nukes

I thought that they teach how to read in german schools.
OP made additional conditons and those conditions are highly unfavourable to russia since nato is a meme and nukes is russian trump card.
It woud be mostly naval battles and bongs ae really good at this stuff. Also you can shove those 15k tanks into your ass unless those tanks can drive through ocean.

>implying all submarines are equal
>implying Russian submarines aren't essentially coffins that sink

there literally isn't even enough space in the UK to store tens of thousands of tanks, not enough docks to supply hundreds of ships and silos to house thousands of nukes.

Offensively, wouldn't last.

Forgive him, he is ze german and he cant imagine other warfare than with ze tanks.

Your navy is fucking shit though fella. You can talk about pure numbers but it matters not when you're operating the crap you do.

And don't look to much into what "military chiefs" say. They hawking for increased defence spending.

who are you assuming that russia will invade the uk and not vise versa?

before they learn to swim they need to be removed from other borders. notably the chinese one. which.. haha.. not gonna fucking happen unless what they want is another rice eating shithole

when the fuck will people realize warfare isn't a game of RISK where you can ragefuck everything up with moving all your army in a single square.

Why would the UK invade Russia, you mental bastard?

Because why would we invade you? We'd just blow you away from a distance.

so you admit that your generals are fear mongering against russia in order to get more money?

Poor Britain
I wish all Poles to leave that cursed land before the Russians nuke it

Attached: photo_2018-02-10_13-54-45.jpg (960x684, 77K)

we're all doing it user

You would certainly damage their economy. But it still would be a boring war as nothing would happen
The Mediterranean (at Gibraltar) and the baltic/North sea would be blocked to Russian vessels.
And you don't buy russian gas unlike the krauts, I think you are the only euro country that can stand up to Russia
You have them too

idk, why did france, germany, sweden invade russia? ressources, land, power etc.

Russia has the high ground

Russia is stronger than the UK. But I dont see you guys occupying each other. Especially when surrounding countries are neutral so there are no nearby staging grounds.

And bongs will invade russia with what?
Their drunk slags tourists?
And most importantly, why?
With russian manpower and size it is basicly immposible to occupy that country.
Not to mention famous winter.

finally you admit it

>Not to mention famous winter.
>Russian shills think it's still 1942

as if this is something to be ashamed of. you krauts are truly a wonderful example of how individually you're all fucking retarded beyond saving yet somehow manage to operate as a collective

that is of course if you're not an economic refugee from ru-fed.. a literal equivalent of a nigger from africa

>nato shills are so dumb that they start attacking each other

UK wins since Russia has the same GDP per capita as India.

The Netherlands defeated an invasion by Germany, France and the UK at the same time.
And together with France we stopped an invasion by Russia and the UK at the same time.

So both of you are a bit of a joke compared to us.

We do have them, yes. But they'll never be used unless in retaliation.

Putin is a fucking mentalist who wouldn't hesitate though.

and lower than italy.. the most inefficient country the european imagination can conjure

He's not a Kraut. He's a Russian who hates Russia that much he left and settled in a country that tried to wipe him out. lmao.

>Russia: 10,248$
>India: 1,852$
>literally the same

I know Nato shills aren't really known for being very intelligent but this is 1st grade tier

I didn't check it but iam pretty shure that most bong military equpment dont operate in -40.
That's what you westerners dont get about russia. It is fucking cold as fuck. Just dont repeat Napoleon ad Hitler retarded mistakes.
Also, stay civilized and dont call people russians. It is one of the worst insults.

>le invincible general winter
You know the Russians lost WWI against the Germans. The only reason Brest-Litovsk was overturned was due to the collapse of the German front in the West.