Any atheist alt-right/libertarians here? Is that a thing?

Any atheist alt-right/libertarians here? Is that a thing?

Other urls found in this thread:

voxday.blogspot.com/2016/08/so-thats-settled.html
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I don't consider myself alt-right or libertarian but I am a pro-life atheist conservative who believes we really need to do something about global climate change but also need to carpetbomb the desert.

are you me

Yes, there are tons of conservative atheists on this site. Myself included.

>any atheist alt-right

No, because the "alt-right" doesn't exist. Lurk more, CNN.

Agnostic here behind him all the way to the whitehouse

>pro-life
Japan doesn't have to worry about millions of potential black children.

Most Atheists are naturally immoral, and as such have liberal leanings.

There might be some 'good' atheists, but I wouldn't trust them to watch my kids.

Libertarianism is at odds with alt right. Cannot be both. Many people come to the alt right from libertarianism, however. Atheists should at least appreciate the values Christianity has brought to Western civilization and the importance of keeping those values

Trump isn't a Bible thumper

Operated Casinos

Trump only triggers the atheist when he panders to the Evangelical....but Hillary does this too

>Atheists should at least appreciate the values Christianity has brought to Western civilization and the importance of keeping those values
Yeah, wonderful values like spreading the other cheek to muslim invaders.
Western civilization started with pagans

Not this pope. I'm talking about th values the built civilizations.

>be me
>want to live in Libertarian utopia
>Kikes, nigs and spics won't let that happen

Sup Forums was right again

Pure deism is objectively the most accurate belief one could have.

I can tell you comfortably that the Bible is a work of fiction designed to keep retards in line. I support Trump.

So you would consider yourself pro-science?

Libertarian is in no way equal to the 'alt-right'. You have to do some pretty crazy mental gymnastics to come to that conclusion. Those are two competing ideologies and I feel like you're a shill or a retard by trying to make such a connection.

If I hear you're an atheist, you will lose my respect and I won't do business with you.

I am am atheist voting for Trump

Yeah, I'm atheist alt right. A lot of alt righters are iffy on religion really.

The only thing an atheist has to do to change is learn how to astral project.

But that requires internal mental effort, and worst of all, humility.

>The only thing an atheist has to do to change is learn how to astral project.
>But that requires internal mental effort, and worst of all, humility.

Or we could devote our energies on important things and not magical nonsense.

I am an atheist and I don't really like Trump. With that said I think he's the best option for the American election and I urge people to vote for him, if nothing else softening political correctness is something that lead to better and more honest politicians in the future.

Im Agnostic, taking the Johnson 2016.

Trump will soften political correctness in the same way that Obama fixed the healthcare crisis.

japan-bro get it. me too.

also, vote for hitler.

Unlikely. He's brought nationalism out into the open to the point that frikkin Paul Ryan had to at least act like he wasn't a globalist shill to get reelected.

Atheist here.

I consider myself libertarian, with a dash of centrist conservative.

Replacing one fascist school of thought with another doesn't soften anything. Nationalism is powered by the same political correctness that the radical left is.

You're a cuck. Saying you want to stop political correctness is like saying you want to stop Muslim rape in Sweden. These are symptoms. Political correctness is a symptom of Cultural Marxism and Muslim rape is a symptom of immigration which is a symptom of Cultural Marxism which is really a symptom of Jews in the West, but you're not ready to hear that last part. Destroying Cultural Marxism and removing Jews and other undesirables from our countries is the only way to save them

I'm a Libertarian and I feel camaraderie with those who are 'alt-right' or identify in that way. I do think RamzPaul, the only person I know who actually says he is Alt-right has some worthwhile things to say. Being mixed-race though I can't help but feel betrayed because I have nothing else to identify as, other than American. In some ways we can overlap and both realize that there are huge problems with the left that we can't ignore. Being a Libertarian I support the 'storm-weenies' being able to voice their opinions and not be laughed out of a discussion with attacks. We both in some way, have a reason to Vote for Trump and are glad about Brexit.

IMO though, Bernouts and Neo-Nazi people fight for the same amount of authoritative power through socialism, just for different people and it's funny to me.

>Replacing one fascist school of thought with another doesn't soften anything.

Ignoring that its retarded to dismiss all that hurts your feelings as "fascist..."

Political correctness is adhering to a "progressive" or even marxist dogma on matters such as ethnicity, gender, orientation or ecology. So yeah, you're mistaken.

Nationalism is as antithetical to political correctness as it gets.

Here and now, that is true. In almost any other time in history being Nationalist would be perfectly politically correct, for example, if I said I hate America blah blah blah during the red scare, I'd be in jail under suspicion as a Communist. All because it would have been politically incorrect to say so.

Exaggerating but you know.

How is the 'alt-right' not neo-nazi? If its not then it's neo-neo-nazi. Milo etc might not be, but the overall majority of his supporters who are the muscle behind the movement definitely are. I've spent enough time on this board to know that as indisputable fact. I agree with everything else you've said though. I support the radical left and the radical rights voice, but I don't agree with them and see them as 2 different sides of the same coin.

Your example has sweet fuck all to do with political correctness, you utter motherfucking imbecile. Do you even know what that phrase means?

Milo etc are enemies of the alt right.

Maybe my definition of political correctness is wrong. I was under the assumption that political correctness was following the status quo, whatever that is at the time.

Not alt-right. But I am an atheist who believes in putting western civilization first.

I.e.: Don't enable shit-cultures like house of islam.
Be harder on china with regards to trade.
Make friends with countries similar to us, (ie.: South Korea, Japan, Singapore)
Leave compatible and non-hostile cultures alone. (Latin america, Russia)
Don't take immigrants from shitholes.

I know what the definition is and how people see it.
>speech that makes it so I can't bash people I don't like in public
The way it was always explained to me is that being politically correct is to speak in line with accepted and safe political speech. Basically to not be offensive, to speak with politic.

>I'd be in jail under suspicion as a Communist

Nah, you might be blacklisted from making movies, anyway. Oy vey, the sufferink! Its another shoah!

Its safe to say that McCarthyism long predated political correctness. Now, if you want to bastardize "political correctness" into "anything that aggravates anyone for any reason," that's fine, but strictly wrong. Communism was not shunned for being insufficiently progressive, though the neoconservative movement did get its start in part from American leftists (mostly jews) deciding the Soviets per se weren't serious in their ideological pretensions.

Finally, "progressivism" is definitely a subjective consideration. However, there was no time in history, ever, that lacking belief in nations was viewed as politically incorrect as progressivism and political correctness long postdated any such considerations.

What do you disagree with the alt right on?

>The way it was always explained to me is that being politically correct is to speak in line with accepted and safe political speech. Basically to not be offensive, to speak with politic.

Political correctness, and inoffensiveness, are two radically different things. PC is being mindful of the privilege hierarchy in your speech. It doesn't otherwise mean nice or respectful.

Its not really neo nazi (unless you call all white nationalism neonazi) but it is definitely de facto nativist.

I'm atheist but I believe people should read the Quran before accepting muslims into their country and saying everything they do has nothing to do with Islam.

The only failures with capitalism I see come from government intervention, so while I believe there's a need for regulation, it should always err on the side of libertarianism.

>is that a thing?
well for starters 90% of all non burger posters here are atheists, I'm guessing most burgers posting here are also atheists, nobody cares about your kike on a stick faggot

>The way it was always explained to me is that being politically correct is to speak in line with accepted and safe political speech.

No. Political correctness means censorship and intentional distortion of the truth (or outright lies) to protect the feelings of groups of people deemed "unprivileged", regardless of the current status quo or people in power.

better pic

They're opposed to multiculturalism which I get.
But they're also pretty hard on having their white ethnostate or purging the jews.

No doubt many of the schemers who brought us here are (((they))) but I think it's incidental. Jews are intelligent, so they'll naturally be involved in any scheme. We just gotta get them out of economics and politics and into science and we'll be best buds like Nips and Whites.

Basically I don't care so much about race as I do about competence, then again I don't live in a nation where black people are destroying everything.

The way I was brought up, any race based nationalism is a neo-nazi. Its repackaged nationalism. I don't disagree with it because it hurts my feelings, but because I don't see it as building a strong nation. It's not working for North Korea(and I disregard most things I hear about North Korea) and if it doesn't work for them I definitely don't think it will work for a country as diverse as the USA.

Libertarians would have you open up immigration to everyone. Only government can prevent it

Here. Atheist, Neo Classical-Liberal (anti-authoritarian)

I'm a strongly-voiced atheist libertarian.

Also, not a fan of collectivism or tribalism.

You have loyalty to your nation because the nation is the way you defend your way of life, liberties and rights. Not because it's your tribe. If you don't believe in the values enshrined in your nation why even bother?

I believe in individualism while using some collectivist ideas when it comes to the interaction of our society with others. But the ideal is treating each person on their merits.

The most discriminated against minority in the USA is the individual.

Is that the same as open borders? Everyone should be able to go through the immigration process, but that doesn't mean there shouldn't be standards and the possibility of rejection.

Nice digits by the way.

Yes. been a Trump supporter since last September. Bought his merch and saw him in person.

You should Kevin Macdonald, specifically Culture of Critique. There is some strong evidence that this what not a incidentally. Jews view white identity as a threat and have taken steps to eliminate it to protect themselves from what they consider antisemitism.

>t. Molyneux
The reason jews (or rather Zionists) are scheming is because they hate the white race.

>Basically I don't care so much about race as I do about competence
so you're a cuckservative that have no problems with non Norwegians flooding into your country as long as they are productive members of society
Have fun going extinct

America before the 1965 Immigration Act wasn't North Korea.

They state they want the free open movement of people and goods. It's on their website. I'm having a hard time using this iPad so I don't feel like trying to find but it's there

I am hard-line atheist, I think all concepts of gods or higher powers are a crock of shit. BUT, I fucking love Trump. I hate the lefties, (the fagy atheist lefties too) I want Trump to make the tears flow.

>so you're a cuckservative that have no problems with non Norwegians flooding into your country as long as they are productive members of society
>Have fun going extinct
Kinda yes? Not worried about going extinct because obviously Norwegians are proven productive members of society.

Am worried about birth rates though. Obviously because we are getting tons of immigrants who are NOT productive members, NOT intelligent and NOT virtuous people in any way and THEIR population is growing.

I don't know many libertarians who are in favor of completely unregulated open borders, most of the time it's just fewer restrictions on the immigration process/trade.

>race basted nationalism leads to North Korea
what the actual fuck

yes.

Obviously the alt-right likes christianity (it's better than Islam) and think whites are super hot shit (even though we are pretty good, Asians are better btw)

Everything else on the alt-right platform is good.

>overall majority of his supporters who are the muscle behind the movement definitely are
Well most people aren't smart and for people who have the worst opinions, they are always the loudest most ignorant meme spewing of the bunch. If the Nazi's want to be taken seriously they need more people who take lessons from people who have nuance and understand how to argue.

By the definition I was taught. I know it is a term created to protect people that other people deem worthy of protection, but in affect what it really is and how I was taught, is that it is language that protects the current political establishment.

It's not boiling down to anything that aggravates anyone, it aggravates accepted political ideology. If it was that simple of a claim, me saying a meal your mother cooked tasted like piss would be politically incorrect. No, that would just be rude.

>However, there was no time in history, ever, that lacking belief in nations was viewed as politically incorrect as progressivism and political correctness long postdated any such considerations.

Terms change, and terms are made, throughout all time and in all cultures there have been acceptable and unacceptable things to say about the current political establishment. If you were an asset to the Roman Empire, you were Roman before whatever else you were. While you were allowed to keep your customs and your culture, you were Roman and owed allegiance and loyalty to Rome and Roman trade. Any inkling that your city was against Rome, your city was punished. In the terms I was taught it might not have been called politically incorrect to say "fuck the Romans, we want an independent Jerusalem" but in affect it was 'politically incorrect' for you or your leaders to say so.

I use politically correct as a blanket term for anything that is against acceptable political thought or rhetoric. Isn't that why so many people love Donald Trump?

In America, libertarians are a real political party with official agendas, policies, conventions, and everything.

I'm atheist
Pro-choice
Environmentalist
Nationalist

But we have to nuke Mecca and depopulate the world by fully half in order to avoid a guaranteed malthusian apocalypse caused by rampant population growth

fpbp

>atheist alt-right/libertarians
This is like the holy trinity of r€ddit

Congratulations you are a living meme man

Are you wearing a fedora by any chance?

atheists have a history of being open-borders marxists. the current wave constantly defends islam. no way will they vote for trump. theyll burn their vote on 3rd party anyway

Eat a dick you pagan faggot

Yes, I'm an atheist, Alt-Right Trump supporter.

>Atheists are naturally immoral
Yeah, okay Gramps. This is why I never bring my lack of religion up, because it literally only causes problems.

That's pretty at odds with the alt right. I believe the people are what define your nation. The US was created by Europeans with European ideals. If you replace the people, you replace those ideals and what you have left is no longer America. Same goes for Europe or Japan, for that matter

But I am an American Libertarian...

great go kill your own people, I literally can't think of anything else to say, go ahead become extinct.

I'm really beginning to see the side of the Nazis more and more, you blind capitalists are complete scum

>By the definition I was taught

Ok, you're taught wrong.

>Terms change, and terms are made, throughout all time and in all cultures there have been acceptable and unacceptable things to say about the current political establishment

And you're using a concept that barely existed before the 90s.

>I use politically correct as a blanket term for anything that is against acceptable political thought or rhetoric.

Okay. We're just letting you know you didn't know the definition of political correctness.

You're thinking politically unorthodox, not politically incorrect. And yes, orthodoxy long predates Trump.

I'm atheist and open borders is retarded.
There is no logic in an atheist bending over for Islam or the new wave of feminism, I don't know why so many do.

Nazism was completely atheistic/paganistic similar to all socialist ideologies. Socialism cannot exist under the hierarchy of christianity.

>the current wave constantly defends islam.

ask jeeves "international atheist"

Of course is atheists are here. We just don't do euphoric tips all day.

Pre-1965 America doesn't exist anymore does it? Blame the jews or whatever boogeyman you want, but I strive for a nation/world that can't be toppled by anyone or anything and the only politcal ideology that I think will support that is socially liberal and fiscally conservative libertarian-ism. Like norway bro, the only race I care about is the human race and right now, we are all losing.

Hitler was a Christian.

>If you replace the people, you replace those ideals and what you have left is no longer America. Same goes for Europe or Japan, for that matter
I won't say you're completely wrong.

For instance, if you replaced all of Japan or Norway with niggers, it wouldn't work. They're (statistically speaking as a group) are simply not intelligent enough, do not have the right temparament to allow for our kind of society.
However, if you replaced all of Norway with Japanese? Sure, things would be different, inevitably, but by and large many many values and ideals would persist. To such a degree, I think, that I don't think I'd even mind living there. I lived in Japan a while, and sure, it's different, but in many fundamental ways, it's also the same.

So basically, if you have a bunch of capable human beings in the same place, you can construct any kind of society I think.

The alt-right is a news media meme and thinkpiece celebrities e.g. milo who pander to the news media meme.

There is paleoconservatism, libertarianism and outright fascist national socialism. Any and all of these things are "alt-right" if it serves the practical needs of the media meme machine

3RD EYE BTFO.

>politically unorthodox
Listen, I'm not even denying your view point.
>It's a cultural marxist term used to stop people from openly hating JEWS and NIGGERS.

I'm not wrong though, there has existed side by side with civilization an acceptable politc and nuance to speech. I know what it means and what it stands for, in multiple senses.

I'm an atheist and I want Trump to win and I want that God damn wall built!

Alt-Right is explicitly Christian.

>Blame the jews or whatever boogeyman you want,

I just told you, the Immigration Act of 1965.

Also, globalists do not have the right to pretend to care about nations.

Agnostic (leaning Athiest) alt-right libertarian/authoritarian-where-it-counts fag reporting in. I'm a walking contradiction, but it's all of you who are wrong, not me.

I don't know how you could be that retarded.
Is Richard Spencer even Christian?

Go back to the woods Larper.

>Christianity
>having anything to do with civilization
L M A O

Trying to eliminate the leftist core inherent to political correctness just generalizes it into "orthodoxy" and we already have that term.

So your so-called strong nation toppled itself?

>They're (statistically speaking as a group) are simply not intelligent enough.
Not necessarily, this is caused more by poverty/corruption/religion/culture than it is by genetics. There's more to being a nigger than just the melanin.

voxday.blogspot.com/2016/08/so-thats-settled.html

Don't blame me for your ignorance.

Some people are more capable of maintaining a civilization than others. I don't think society would collapse if you replaced Norwegians with Japanese (obviously I think it would if you replaced them with Sub Saharan Africans), but you would lose Norwegian culture. It would come to resemble Japan more than it does Norway. The same way when a bunch of Chinese live in parts of our cities they form China Towns. I think losing any culture is a terrible thing, but I obviously care about Western cultures more. We can already see this happening in some European countries.

Being this retarded