What is wrong with a former president running a foundation...

What is wrong with a former president running a foundation? Lots of presidents run charities a d the fact there is some overlap between donors and people who met with the Sec of state isn't illegal.
What's the issue here?

Other urls found in this thread:

matadornetwork.com/change/habitat-for-humanity-where-does-all-the-money-go/
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>CF
> charity

Nothing is wrong with what you say.

The things that are wrong about the Clinton activities in particular:

- selling access for donations
- using it as a money laundering hub
- diverting assets into secret bank accounts
- spending 90% of funds on personnel expenses like private jets, caviar

>96% of donations went towards my own foundation

THHHIIICCCCCC

Hillary has been convicted in the court of public opinion. After constant investigation they still fail to turn up anything concrete, and they continue to waste the state's time and money.

I knew someone whose brother nearly spent 40 years in jail because of a false rape charge before it was disproved in court saying Hillary shouldn't be president just because she had been accused so many times that something had to be wrong.

The Bush Institute and Habitat For Humanity will be the next financial-fraud centers to fall.

There's nothing wrong with a former president running a foundation. It's pretty common and often a way to cement their legacy,

The issue at hand is not was there overlap between donors and people meeting with the Sec. Of State. It's whether or not the foundation was a vehicle for influencing the Secretary of State.

Jimmy Carter didn't trade state secrets for donations to Habitat for Humanity

that is where you are wrong. she very clearly lied to congress and to the public, which is called 'perjury'. she is very clearly selling access to american domestic and foreign policy making to people financially attached to her personal hedge-fund group, the Clinton Foundation. it is agreed by over 60% of the public and a little more than half of congress, that she IS guilty of these crimes and that SHE SHOULD face trial, just as her husband did, which is why the FBI and the IRS are moving forward with further investigations of her and the Foundation even after presidential requests and orders to the contrary. the government DOES NOT GET TO JUDGE ITSELF, WE DO THAT.

>the person who receives numerous donations in exchange for favoritism is being kept out of jail

Oh man if all of that is true I guess she will be charged any Day now.
Oh wait, she has been cleared every time but the GOP keeps blowing money on these investigations

he's been doing the same pay-to-play thing on a smaller scale because he isn't a complete fucking retard asshole, just an anti-semitic, socialist-thief.

matadornetwork.com/change/habitat-for-humanity-where-does-all-the-money-go/

Sage shill threads
Report shill threads
Hide shill threads

>running a foundation

It's not a foundation. It's a racketeering operation at the cost of United States assets and services.

A very small percentage of the money collected through the foundation actually goes to worthwhile charities. The rest lines the pockets of the Clintons.

you fruitloops always like to say that, but it just proves that you either don't know a thing about investigative process, judicial process, or due process, which is crazy considering how many laws and ordinances DemoRats like adding to the books every time they get elected.

all of those 'republican witch-hunts and investigations' started out as tax-payer petitions to investigate strange happenings with tax-payer money. they all led to serious fucking questions about the same dumbass in the state department. she has yet to answer ANY of those questions.

Innocent until proven guilty.
She was eared by the FBI,she was cleared in white water, in travel gate in any of the six billion bullshit accusations that the republican party makes up.

She has been proven guilty. Multiple times. But nobody will indict because they don't want to comit suicide

When was she proven guilty?

These were donations from government figures in countries like Saudi Arabia, countries we make weapons deals with.

The whole thing stinks. And if Donald Trump wasn't such a goddamn buffoon it would be all the media was talking about.

well the 'perjury' charges are pretty fucking clear, that video is literally everywhere. the pay-to-play is also pretty damn cut and dry just considering the Clinton Foundation's very own published financial statements. the only thing missing is a the courtroom you fucking retard. first you said she has 'never been charged' and now you say 'innocent until proven guilty', but what you clearly cannot say is that she isn't guilty, because she so clearly is.

She said to congess under oath that her private server did not have classified info on it. This wasn't true. Then, she said she didn't KNOW, this was a lie, as proven by her personal coorespondence instructing her aides to strip clsssified headers from documents for unsecture transfer by her server. She told the feds she wouldn't accept foreign dinations while secretary of the state, then took millions from the Saudis. Recently it was revealed that doners got special access to the state department, or in other words, she literally took bribes.

until you have a net worth of at least a billion dollars and are running for POTUS, it's kinda hard to take your claim that Trump is a 'buffoon' seriously..

>there is some overlap b


Not according to findings. There is enormous overlap in the case of the clintons. The foundation is just a depository for the sale of political influence.

They take in billions of dollars, and give back pennies.
Most of what they do is orchestrated rip offs, look into their AIDS drugs or Haiti.
It is illegal to take bribes from forum governments, they would have been indicted for taking China money, if the U.N. official hadn't suddenly died from a weightlifting accident.

It isn't a charity, it's just a slush fund with the added bonus of a tax shelter.

If you look at their books, they spend more on office supplies, than charity.

I'm no fan of Hillary, but most of the Republican "investigations" and "scandals" are complete bullshit. It's a lot like the recent rape epidemic. Real rapes are treated with scepticism because fake ones got attention.