>MUH GROUNDBREAKING LEAK
Assange is a joke. He knows he has little to no dirt on Hillary, and so is pushing the date even further back to October so he can try and dig something up in the meantime. He'll find nothing, though. Mainly because one dude in the Ecuadorian Embassy doesn't stand a snowball's chance in Iraq at hacking the US Government.
Face it, the leak isn't coming. If he had such an earth-shattering leak he would have released it by now.
It's Ogre for Assange and its over for Trump
Other urls found in this thread:
twitter.com
twitter.com
Sage
Did you hear about Hillary's e-mails?
I heard she didn't get indicted for them.
He'd like to deliver leaks like in the times of glory of wikileaks but all he can do now is just promise groundbreaking leaks and delivering nothing
Or alternatively he has dirt and is afraid for his life.
>releasing the spicy stuff this long before the debates
wew lad
assange knows what he's doing, it will be worth the wait
The primary thing we found out from these leaks is that government emails are really boring. No effect on the election at all.
>assange knows what he's doing,
clickbaiting
The excuse given by the FBI is ridiculous, they admitted she managed the email wrongly and threatened national security (it's impossible to investigate if the server was hacked or not). She also lied in the depositions (3 cellphones instead of 1, deleted emails, claimed to have given every email).
This is what someone would call too big to jail.
OP is scared shitless!
Why would they kill him after he leaks the information? That makes them look more guilty.
But nobody cares.
Debates have a negligible effect on elections.
>Le increasing nervous CTR shill
He said he's waiting until October, which makes sense if he's trying to influence voters right before the election.
Keep in mind the Michael Dukakis was flying high in practically all of the polls during the summer of 1988. Then a commercial released in October (by a man named Lee Atwater) helped destroy his campaign.
Btw, Assange is currently working with Roger Stone, who was a close friend of the deceased Atwater. So, keep that in mind.
>I don't care therefore no one else does
as expected from a bong
dangerous man has information that could destroy us! what should we do? kill him before he leaks it, or wait until after he leaks it?
>wait until after he destroys us with his information.
the one consistent thing about trump supporters is a lack of basic logic circuitry.
Not true for Regan. Hell even Romney had a huge turn around after his first debate with Obongo. It wasn't until the second debate which was completely staged and he fumbled, that Obama got back on top.
Thanks for correcting the record :^)
Record:
Corrected
Not corrected
Hey look, it's the same CTR faggots that were posting the Drumpf photoshopped images.
Go fuck off and jerk it to cuck porn.
Good job OP, this thread sure is high quality and doesn't look like a CTR shitpost at all
SAGE
But literally nobody cares anymore, now that Trump has said so much stupid shit and made so many unforced errors. Most centrists are leaning Hillary because Trump can't keep his god damn mouth shut.
>image.jpg
>(it's impossible to investigate if the server was hacked or not)
This is a lie. I'm a computer security expert. The server would create logs of everything that happened.
>but the logs can be deleted
You can recover the data
>not if it's been overwritten
Yes you can, by carefully examining the hardware medium itself for traces. This level of forensic examination is rarely done on small cases because it is extremely time and money intensive, but it is possible for cases as big as this, where national security is at stake. It would need to be overwritten some 10 or so times to completely erase all evidence. And if it was overwritten that many times, that is suspicious in itself because it points to the fact that someone was trying to hide something.
P.S. But we already know that sensitive information was leaked. Hillary had Special Access Protocol data on her computer. This is above-top-secret stuff that only exists on closed networks. In order to see it, you'd need to go into some high-security facility, and be shown it, eyes-only, no hard copies. An example of a SAP would be the identities of active deep cover CIA field agents in foreign countries.
There is literally no fucking reason for hillary to have this shit on her private computer. The only explanation is that she intended to compromise US security, for instance, because she intended to auction off the data to the highest foreign bidder via her phony charity.
CTR know they have to shill hard against Assange, because he is supported by so many non-interventionist lefties and centrists who might have voted Hillary.
It's not Assange's fault that apparently Hillary has to literally be caught in the act of strangling someone with her bare hands to face any type of discipline for her actions.
Assange isn't a joke, it's just that nobody cares except Sup Forumsacks and a few other people.
That's why he almost shot himself in the back of the head multiple times last week.