U.N. / George Soros To Take Over The Internet Thread #2

Obama is giving away US Internet to the UN and George Soros!

Wall street Journal:
wsj.com/articles/an-internet-giveaway-to-the-u-n-1472421165#livefyre-comment

Alex Jones
youtube.com/watch?v=wXS19JsdugU

What are the implications? What can we do to stop it?

Previous thread

Other urls found in this thread:

bbc.com/news/world-europe-37155060
keywiki.org/George_Soros_-_Affiliations
w3.org
wsj.com/articles/an-internet-giveaway-to-the-u-n-1472421165#livefyre-comment
youtu.be/Ct9xzXUQLuY
youtube.com/watch?v=qRz77mkY46g
icann.org/news/blog/icann-is-not-the-internet-content-police
bbc.com/news/technology-37114313
zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-29/leaked-soros-document-calls-regulating-internet-favor-open-society-supporters
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Best idea to stop it: Have a "Sit In".
This involves sending meme frogs to 100 million people, to tell them "Buy food, don't go to work".

Not going so well.

Where were we?

user () said:

>Stock up with 1 month of food. Only buy non-parish stuff.
>The government would probably retaliate with cutting off the power grid, shit would get ugly fast.

They can't cut off the power grid without cutting themselves off too. And hospitals. At that point, another country (like Canada) would intervene for the sake of the people. And there would be backing by other countries. US gov can only go so far before triggering an all-out global fuck up.

Would be worth throwing on normiebook. Normies have no idea. Just need to say it classier than a humble water filter salesman.

Use the "Germans tell citizens to stock up on food" articles, then tell normies "OH SHIT STOCK UP" it could work.

Can't be like OWS either. Nice try, but wew what a disorganised mess.

It has to be a huge amount of people.

Why were people mass protesting SOPA & PIPA but not this?

bbc.com/news/world-europe-37155060

Fear porn normies to stock up on food.

BRING ME THAT CURSED FROG

Say goodbye to free speech and lolis!

Because big Internet names got involved with that. Splash pages all over reg sites.

Not sure why they're being slack regarding this or the TPP (unless they already know it's going to fail).

This may be a reason though - fucking hell, EFF is in there..
keywiki.org/George_Soros_-_Affiliations

Good. Shut it down Soros. Shut it ALL down.

Sup Forums is the only addiction I have keeping me from reality.
If I couldn't get on and the tether is cut, I'd actually be forced to go outside and accomplish something in my life.

You faggots are absolutely batshit retarded. I actually have talked with APNIC's president and director general about this and each RIR will have a stake in the decision making, which is a good thing considering that the US can make TLDs for any country stop working right now. This change was being planned for decades.

>What are the implications?
People can "buy" internet laws that aren't subject to the American Constitution.
All the little guys that got their pitchforks out like Minecraft all got bought out by someone bigger than them.

You'll end up killing yourself

Whatever you do don't click this link:
w3.org

LOO

Tell this to the one world religion
the one world government
the one world fucking everything.

>People can "buy" internet laws that aren't subject to the American Constitution.
You have absolutely no idea what ICANN is, do you?

>wsj.com/articles/an-internet-giveaway-to-the-u-n-1472421165#livefyre-comment

Domain system, Ackmed.
>muh nonprofit
Too bad the UN isn't

Meshnet when?

>icann
>nonprofit
lel

EVERYTHING IS MINE BECAUSE I AM THE PRINCE OF DARKNESS

YOU BOW DOWN TO GEORGE SOROS

The Internet is the only thing that has so far remained untouched. They hate it.

>Jay Rockefeller: Internet should have never existed
youtu.be/Ct9xzXUQLuY

The Rockefellers are the American branch of the Rothschilds. Soros is a puppet of both families.

Old-school BBS networks, with content propagating by dial-outs after it's posted? That
could provide some kind of stop-gap, at least.

Should start on this ASAP.

All your internet are belong to me

Sup Forums has a thread on this

This post is relevant..

>Point is: the entire reason for the US dropping it's leadership over ICANN (besides the untenablity of US control over it as the Internet expands all over the planet) is so that the US no longer has control over it. The UN is run by the UNSC, of which members can veto anything. The US is a member and through it's veto would be able to stop any changes to the Internet it did not approve of.

>This is a problem as ICANN is bring moved out of the US is because other countries (specifically England, France, China and Russia) want the ability to easily censor their own domestic internet (like China already does). To do this, they need an ICANN where the US is not dominant as the US will always oppose censorship as it hinders their intelligence dragnets.

related? youtube.com/watch?v=qRz77mkY46g

Is there literally anything we can do to stop this?

I'd rather be able to look at my specific fetish porn and hate niggers and jews online and not be sent to prison for it or get censored.

I've been hearing Soros often.

well shit, looks like we're all done for...

BETA UPRISING NOW REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Congress would have to veto the proposal.

>give away the internet

once again Sup Forums proves it knows absolutely fucking nothing

Are they able to do so, or is this another one of King Nigger's "executive orders."

I fucking hate this Obama cunt.

Eh? What part of each RIR will have stake in the decision making process doesn't make sense to you?
icann.org/news/blog/icann-is-not-the-internet-content-police
This is better than the current setup

wew can't wait to radio internet. gonna be cyberpunk as fuck

I'm surprised the KKK, IKA or White Supremesists in general hasn't gone after Obama. They hate blacks so why the fuck hasn't they gone after him?

>ICANN handles domain names

Deep web here I come

>US ready to 'hand over' the internet's naming system
bbc.com/news/technology-37114313

>From October, the “new” Icann will become an organisation that answers to multiple stakeholders who want a say over the internet. Those stakeholders include countries, businesses and groups offering technical expertise.

>"It marks a transition from an internet effectively governed by one nation to a multi-stakeholder governed internet: a properly global solution for what has become a global asset."

>Technically, the US is doing this voluntarily - if it wanted to keep power of DNS, it could. But the country has long acknowledged that relinquishing its control was a vital act of international diplomacy.

>Other countries, particularly China and Russia, had put pressure on the UN to call for the DNS to be controlled by the United Nations’ International Telecommunication Union.

>In response to worries about abuse of the internet by foreign governments, the NTIA said it had consulted corporate governance experts who said its the prospect of government interference was “extremely remote”.

>"This has nothing to do with laws on the internet,” Prof Woodward said.

>"Those still are the national laws that apply where it touches those countries.

>"This is more about who officially controls the foundations of the Internet/web addresses and domain names, without which the network wouldn't function."

ISPs can block Tor nodes

>literally using a government honeypot browser
Anything but Tor

So with China and Russia delving into domains what will they try first?

>.catcrush
>.slav

Fill me in lads, what's happening?

How fucked are we?

>How fucked are we?
Beyond fucked

Considering your country is full of mudslimes you're pretty fucked when it comes to future censorship on the web.

September 30th Soros Controls the internet

they arent giving anything away you tard. a company overseeing internet ips making sure they match the domain name is no longer going to be handled by the us government

they dont have any authority over the internet if they do anything they will lose authority in reality as the angry masses reject the UN

they cant block a single user they can only make sure this companies domain name matches the expected up. so they cant pull anything from say youtube with it. they cant stop me from posting comments without fucking every one else and google who might send a assassin to kill some guys at the UN if they refused to fix the problem

Then the UN makes law and has "hate speech" laws passed. We get arrested for for calling bi-linear trans-rubberduckies the wrong proverb and get sentanced to 5 gorillion years in FEMA camps.

Where exactly does Soros come into this? As far as I knew the US was handing over internet authority to a private company under the control of the UN. I don't see how Soros is involved.

Good. With no Americans, the discussions might actually be productive.

>easier to censor the internet
>grant the ".gay" domain already, goyim
>deny ".cpa" domain to American Institute of CPAs
>saves the big point for the last paragraph

You have no idea what you are talking about.

>"hate speech" laws

There's the problem right there. US has freedom of speech laws and Canada has the Charter, but wtf do other countries have to protect them? Also hate speech is going to be linked to crime and then the protections go right out the window.

You can't even drop simple dox here without getting RCMP hauling you in and asking you about your "online activity." What happens if a pile of us say "kill yourself you retard" and the retard actually does it.

I can't imagine not saying "kill yourself" at least once a day on Sup Forums. I mean, it's just not possible.

>Leaked Soros Document Calls For Regulating Internet To Favor 'Open Society' Supporters
zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-29/leaked-soros-document-calls-regulating-internet-favor-open-society-supporters

Thanks leaf, this should be posted at the start of the thread
Now, B.A.T.M.A.N. V should be ready soon and it's already part of the Linux kernel

this is Sup Forums

never let facts get in the way of a good witchhunt

not the lolis! they have to take them from my cold dead hands.

Yea and they're going to add stupid shit to be "hate speech". Especially anything to do with Islam.
Simple opinions will be taken out of context, it's SJW PC crap.

>there's people on this thread who aren't using OpenNIC with dnscrypto and DNSSEC
muh Bridge Relays, anyways Tor is compromised, I2P is the thing now
>company overseeing internet ips making sure they match the domain name is no longer going to be handled by the us government
ICANN also handles IP blocks through IANA, which is a department of ICANN
>they cant block a single user they can only make sure this companies domain name matches the expected up
They can but that's something the ISP's will do

>all this 'ICANN only handles DNS guise!' posts
Is this CTR in action?

Never understood why nobody talks about I2P.

Just this

just post your frog god some more and maybe he will stop it

oh wait the frog is a deification of soros and you are all fucking idiots

>KKK, IKA or White Supremesists in general

All controlled opposition. If you want to see a white who truly cares, look in the mirror. If you aren't going to do anything (you won't), then the chances of any of us are slim to fuck

>(((Anything but Tor)))

Don't you just want to grab his eye jowls and give them a tug?

>As The Gatestone Institute's (((Judith Bergmann))) explains

Every fucking time. It feels like everyone is a Jew. What the fuck is going on?

I want to lick them. Flick them with my tongue until he promises not to be so evil.

>>there's people on this thread who aren't using OpenNIC with dnscrypto and DNSSEC
I run my own DNS recursor with Unbound.
>ICANN also handles IP blocks through IANA, which is a department of ICANN
Not directly. It assigns it to RIRs, which distribute it or allocate to smaller regional organisations to distribute them. You can buy IP blocks, ASNs and IP transit and run your own network. Internet laws depend on where you have broken them. In India there are lim devices at edge boundaries to filter out and log things.
>>they cant block a single user they can only make sure this companies domain name matches the expected up
Not true.
>They can but that's something the ISP's will do
Like I said any small organisation can run their own "ISP"/network
Internet is relatively un-secure by design. Not many transit providers implement BCP38 yet so you can basically spoof IPs and it is very hard to find that out if you want to do anything illegal. There is 100s of gbps of traffic flowing through any IX or network at any time for anyone to even bother about a small user.

Start an alternative LAN Internet by connecting your computers to your neighbors and having them do the same

The same laws which apply to the internet in your region will apply to that too. If distributing lolis is illegal in a country and it's internet, it will be illegal on a LAN which exists in that country.

One day, we will get arrested for saying something retarded like "newfag" and know we were right all along.

Yeah but who's gonna stop you/find out in that situation? Small community networks would probably have to be physically accessed unless some goof was connected to the actual Internet

If Soros is behind EFF, why did they fight SOPA and PIPA so hard?

Is it possible our interests are aligned by coincidence?

Tourism is going to be huge.

Then you have your govt. to blame. Funnily internet laws here require ISPs to maintain NAT logs of routers used by enterprise customers, NAT logs for any NATing the ISP does, lim devices are to be placed in network boundary and peering points. But hardly anyone follows all of that and whenever I ask the Department of Telecom folks at their events they give inane answers. I doubt they actually use the data anytime, unless there is something extremely malicious like a DOS attack by someone and there is a case about that in the courts. Best thing to do is not do anything really stupid, use VPNs if you want to do anything sensitive, use PGP for communication. There cannot be any single law for the entire internet. Whatever laws there are are made by individual countries in almost all of the cases. The maximum the ICANN can do is pressure domain registrars from taking away the domain or reserving domains but it hardly exercises it. FFS even North Korea have a TLD and their own ASN and a /22.

Too inconvenient and when you get big enough govt. will scrutinise it. Or you can use PGP to encrypt things with the public key of the recipient.

Pepe happened organically. He can be traced back to a webcomic on some dude's MySpace.

And there's my answer.

Fucking kike. Jewer of jews.

Maybe sending it to the Bern and Stein supporters, they received a small pill when Sanders lost.
Makes sense they applied these in Germany and they accepted it, then CTR and there`s people saying: "i am not going to open those Clinton leaks documents i don`t care"

Obummer can't give away public property without congress' consent
we're fine for now

>wsj.com/articles/an-internet-giveaway-to-the-u-n-1472421165#livefyre-comment

>links story where you have to log in to read the rest of the story.

>without congress' consent
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH
They're letting it happen, the two parties are owned by the same people. If congress is told to lie down like a dog they do as they're told

The final nail on the coffin is Hillary taking the oath of office. Let us not let this happen. This is absolutely abhorrent. This man needs to be exposed more like his leaked emails.

This is unprecedented, George Soros is a megalomaniac who controls almost every media and politicians worldwide. This guys is worse than Hitler, Stalin, and Mao combined.

It's only a matter of time until Soros gets his hands on nuclear weapons through his puppet Hillary.

>not having a subscription to WSJ
It's like you want to be poor

Idiot here. Can someone explain how this will impact my life? how will this change the Internet? Will it eradicate all torrents/deep web/ anti-leftist content?

m8, you know how much shit congresses blocked from king nigger
quite allot, I doubt they'll let it slide

Even Soros is only a puppet for the Rothschilds. Once again, we must hang the elites.

Sure they will.

ICAAN is being turned over to the UN September 30th by Obama whos lies to us saying that the internet will never be run by the UN.

If you think the censorship and spying is bad under the current conditions, you aint seen nothing yet. The UN will mandate censorship and sites like DCLEAKS exposing George Sorors and his open foundation will be wiped from the internet.

If you control the UN, and you control one of man's greatest inventions for open communication, then you literally CONTROL THE FUCKING WORLD. END THE NEW WORLD ORDER. VOTE TRUMP. END HILLARY AND HER PUPPET MASTERS!

>invest dozens of billions into world peace
>Sup Forums still thinks you're a bad guy
you people are literally retarded, you know that, right?

...

This. The Rothschilds are the ones who run the planet on behalf of their Archon masters.

“The Rothschilds are the wonders of modern banking. Sprung from that poetic, that ancient, that mysterious race, from whom we derive all our religion and half of our civilisation, we see the descendants of Judah, after a persecution of two thousand years, peering above kings, rising higher than emperors, and holding a whole continent in the hollow of their hands. The Rothschilds govern a Christian world. Not a cabinet moves without their advice. They stretch their hand, with equal ease, from Petersburg to Vienna, from Vienna to Paris, from Paris to London, from London to Washington. Baron Rothschild, the head of the house, is the true king of Judah, the prince of the captivity, the Messiah so long looked for by this extraordinary people. He holds the keys of peace or war, blessing or cursing..... They are the brokers and counselors of the kings of Europe and of the republican chiefs of America. What more can they desire? We understand that an accomplished and beautiful daughter of this house, is married to an American, and intends soon to make New York her permanent residence. The beauty of Judah is not departed, nor is the strength of the house of Israel weakened.” - Niles Weekly Register, September 19, 1835

Pic related, it's a political cartoon from 1912 - that's 104 years ago and it's STILL relevant today!