>Why were there so many disproved myths coming from testimonies?
PTSD
>Why did the news stories run with these claims?
News want to sell. Outrageous things sell.
>Why must people be so quick to accept this and denounce those who do not if there is not just something physical or even logical?
I'm just here to debate rational deniers like you, and mock the stormfaggots
>I do not understand why all the camps were not death camps.
Because most were created to house political prisioners, the "asocials", and "work shy", the german criminals... This was pre war.
Then during the war camps were created to house forced labour from occupied countries and the inmates in the above camps. This was absolutely vital for germn war effort, and more then 10 million people were used in schemes such as this.
Death cams were camps built with the sole purpose to kill the jews, and then you have auschwitz, wich was a mixture, because it was both a forced labour camp and a extermination camp
>I do not understand how the red cross could be stationed at the camps and be so ignorant.
They most certainly weren't. Do you have a source for this?
>I do not understand how there can be amenities running alongside a supposed death pit where people were randomly disappearing to.
Because those amenities were for camp guards, kapos and the workers in forced labour.
>I do not understand the decisions that went into deciding which camps were decided (by Reich) to be extermination.
Camps were purpose built. Most were chosen in remote places, near a railroad track, near a river and near large concentrations of jews.
>I do not understand why the Reich gave out free money (sources of testimonies) to buy cigarettes, gamble, brothels, plays, what have you. It just does not make any sense to me.
This was before the war and for political prisioners, right?
