mirror.co.uk
>Research by dating experts Match has found that British singles would be happy for a partner to have had up to 23 previous sexual partners, and a minimum of at least three.
>Any lower or higher than these numbers is perceived as a turn-off, making twelve the optimum number.
>The Spanish (27), Germans (26) and French (24) were similarly liberal, but both Italy and the Netherlands had lower thresholds than the UK
It's over now
Other urls found in this thread:
What the fuck is wrong with normies?
why are they all obsessed with sex so much????
>Men are more happy for partners to have a larger number of previous lovers than women
JUST
I've had around 17 sexual partners or so. In a LTR now so I don't see it growing any time soon.
The vast majority of girls want a guy who has experience, so that they know he knows how to fuck.
Most guys want the opposite it seems.
Also poll results from website
>Most guys want the opposite it seems.
That's because girls don't need 'experience' to be able to lie back and think of England
They put it all over TV, in school, in films, everyone has access to the internet and the internet is for porn, kids are obsessed with it because teenagers are obsessed with it because adults are obsessed with it.
Thank the 60s.
That's not how experience works
I've had sex thousands of times but with the same 3 women
i had like 10 until i married and i feel like a degenerate
All I want is a bitch who can suck dick!
Why are they so hard to find?
How can anything over ten be a "magic number"? Surely the lower the number the better if you're looking for something long term.
>minimum of 3
WHAT THE FUCK
>I won't accept any woman that haven't been fucked by at least 3 bulls before me
HOW BIG OF A CESSPOOL IS THAT ISLAND?
>a minimum of three
>a minimum
Seriously? No.... Like... Seriously?
no other life skills/achievements to content themselves with
Because you aren't a 7 or above bro, unless you are willing lower your standards to socially awkward bushpigs or desperate "Hit the Wall Harder than a F1 car" 40 year old women
I've had about 20-25 female and 5 male. I don't give a shit so long as they aren't baggy. Why would it matter?
Well their for both genders so I assume they mixed the figures for men and women.
Virgin or bust. Or waifubot.
tfw 23 kissless virgin
That's disgusting.
Its probably even worse here.
>minimum of 3 sexual partners
>Anglos won't accept any woman that hasn't been fucked by at least 3 bulls
Yes... Good goy
NO HYMEN
NO DIAMOND
>no sources given
what a terrible fucking article
Virgins are trash and they can't fuck. What do you expect? Someone who has has literally never done something cannot have cultivated a skillset.
wtf
3 is my maximum
maybe if i was 40 and have been a lonely poonless sponge for the past 10 years I'd be fine with more
but if shes fucked more than 3 guys then lmao yeet
It signifies a shift away from approaching relationships like they're a long term commitment and puts more emphasis on shorter term relationships. You wouldn't see a problem with that because you're a degenerate and will continue to defend this sort of behaviour because you feel, rightfully so, that talk like this is a personal attack on your character.
Haha, I like you friend. I'm in a 9 year LTR. I am the only sexual partner. Predictably the sex is mostly shit. Try again though, educate me more on traditional values drawing from your well of experience of course :^)
>tfw redpilled catholic and chemist student virgin gf for over 3 years and want to marry already and have white children with me
Feels good to be mediterranean masterrace
You teach them how to fuck yourself, not by taking Chad and Jamal's leftovers
...
B-but 12 is greater than 3! (Math is hard)
I've only had 2 sex partners and only had sex 10 times.
I'm not the world's leading expert, nor would I be arrogant enough to suppose that any and all skills that could be used to please me could be adequately imparted by me.
>up to 23
Combined with this I'm starting to wonder if the dream I had last night about an arabic chick wasn't a message from Allah.
>calls partner of nine years trash
>"in a relationship" not married
>"Men are happy for new partners to be more experienced with an optimum number of 15, compared to 10 for females."
This is pretty stupid anyway. The "research" was done by a dating site, and dating sites are sure to be full of desperate 30+ year olds and single mothers who will settle for anything which breathes.
Decent people who have normal relationships won't be on dating sites.
The partner is not trash in the least. We're in a long and committed relationship. We support one another, provide and care for one another. It's a good solid foundation for a life shared. The sex is. What, is a relationship just sex to you? Pretty reductionist, baka faam. As to the marriage thing, only a very stupid man would get married in this age. There are no benefits (they were all removed in the name of 'equality') and of the negatives, plus some new ones hitherto unimagined. Modern marriage is fundamentally degenerate.
Are you implying that only "7 and above" dudes get their dick sucked?
lel, I bet you're Asian too.
I personally would never be with a woman in double digits. I'd have a problem with anything higher than me being her 5th or 6th.
I'm dating someone right now and it's sad how hard it was to find someone that even met that criteria .
>Virgins are trash
Thank you for qualifying your earlier edgy statement. I thought you were even more degenerate than you actually are.
Marriage is only bad if you plan on getting divorced. Having a stable family structure to raise your children in is far better than playing house for 25 years. The only reason not to get married is if you think you can't keep your woman, in this case because you're a low-confidence degenerate.
A number is a number. Why give a shit? Its the person that matters
>it's just a number! it's the person that matters!
>being a whore in my 20s is in no way a reflection of my character!
>would be happy for a partner to have had up to 23 previous sexual partners, and a minimum of at least three.
You still haven't explained why marriage is beneficial. Sure, there are consequences for fucking it up (or the woman having had enough). Now what are the advantages? You're telling me to fit a bomb collar and saying there'll be no problem as long as I obey. I'm not putting that fucker on.
Well thats a problem you should've pick up on long before
Why even have a limit if it's going to be that high?
>I had to break up with my girlfriend, I found out that she lied about her sexual history. She had been with 24 men before me, not 23.
>"Yeah, i'd love my woman to be fucked by at least three bulls before I even get to take a good look at her, i mean, its [CURRENT YEAR], duh. No more than 23 of them though, we're not savages haha"
>mfw
Marriage is beneficial because it provides stability to your family. You are swearing to keep this person until death, in front of each other, God, your family and friends, and the state. If you're the kind of person who takes oaths lightly, I guess that wouldn't mean anything, but I don't think your relationship has much of a chance if you don't see the point in keeping promises.
I don't know much about Britbong marriage law, but in the States marriage gives you special access to each other when it comes to healthcare, finances, and the like. There is still some information that can't be revealed to you, but people are much more willing to trust you with things relating to your partner, because they know you won't run out on her the instant she turns 40. You also get a tax break, which is nice, but not that important in the grand scheme of things. Married couples are better at raising kids, the home environment is more stable for them. Finally, you're continuing the traditions of your people. Marriage is only as bad as the people participating in it. If you live a principled life, and have a good marriage, you are preserving your people's culture instead of letting whores and numales define it for you.
>The eternal Anglo strikes again
Figures a homo degenerate wants to destroy the sanctity of marriage
Well I'm 23 and still at 0
So...?
When I make a commitment or take an oath, I don't need to Church or State to hold me to it. If you need that kind of threat hanging over you to ensure you follow through so be it, but my word is my bond. As for the tax break, you get three quid a month. That doesn't go far enough for me to shoulder the risk. As for tradition, marriage is a relatively modern custom outside of the aristocracy.
M-Masaka! The goi is onto me!
SHUT IT DOWN MODS, DO NOT ALLOW THIS HOLOCAUST TO CONTINUE
That's why I have men break my shoes in for me as well. I don't want to have to do the hard work of breaking them in myself.
In fact, I even let the guy borrow my shoes from time to time.
You haven't explained how this cannot be achieved without marriage.
12?! 23?! Holy fucking shit I haven't even had one! I don't think I could ever have more than three, but I'd hope it'd just be one! I can't imagine dating someone who's had sex with so many people. To me that represents instability and frivolousness.
C U C K E D
A G A I N
When you straighten up, and stop being a cuck, you'll see why the marriage ceremony has value. Yes, you can potentially get most of the benefits without being married, but society will rightly view your relationship as less secure, and the kind of people who can make a relationship work without getting married, typically desire to get married in the first place.
>sexual reproduction is literally far older than our entire species
>lol virgins don't know how to fuck BOOORIIIING
yeah fuck off nigel
Why would they reject someone whos had sex less than 3 times thats really weird sounding.
Good women are out there, you just have to look a little harder. Start lifting and take care of yourself so that you can attract one when you find her.
If you're over 30 you might have to settle.
>No more than 23 of them though, i don't want to be some kind of cuck hhaha.
I'm going to open an Arby's franchise in Europe somewhere.
>If you're over 30 you might have to settle
Wizard here. If I'm in this far, I might as well go for the arcane secrets of the universe.
>Hurr durr a woman has to know how to fuck good
How hard is it to bend over and get porked, Jesus Christ. And don't give me that 'but how will she know how to suck good dick' bullshit. Getting a good bj is not an acceptable price to pay for a gf whos had a bunch of other penises in and around her mouth.
Sounds like total bullshit.
I wonder who could be behind this article?
Ive slept with 30 different women in my entire life and had three long relationships.
I think that article is insane. Who wants to marry a woman with that much milleage?
My optimal wife would have 0 previous Partners, but since thats unrealistic I still think less is better.
Who says "she needs to have had at least 10 cocks in her snatch before I put a ring on that!"?
If you want, nothing wrong with committing yourself to learning and contributing to society. But you can also look for a woman who's gone through her first divorce and realizes that she made horrible choices. You have to find one who actually learned from the experience, and it's not ideal compared to a woman who was never married, but you can still be happy.
You can't start living a good life 10 years ago, and if you plan on starting tomorrow, you'll never start. You have to start today, user.
Well...looks I'm never marrying a British person then.
How am I a cuck? My first post is making fun of people wanting experience.
You still haven't told us how being married magically makes me a better parent.
Why does a certificate make it s? Why can't I take the vows without signing the paper?
How can they find the time to have so many different partners?
Sorry, thought you were serious.
You can take the vows without signing a paper, but I would still say that that is a ceremony. It's the ceremony that I think people underestimate. Committing to something out loud, in front of other people has real meaning. There's a spiritual aspect to it that you can fall back on during hard times. You don't NEED to take the vows out loud, but people who don't WANT to also tend to be the kinds of people who make bad partners.
So you're saying my commitment to the state trumps my commitment to God. Nice Christian values, faggot.
>committing yourself to an imaginary globalist instead of your people
Cuck desu
No, I just said the opposite. You don't have to sign the papers, it's the saying of the words, and the wedding ceremony that are important. I don't see why you wouldn't sign the papers, but I consider anyone who has had a ceremony to be married, and am arguing for marriage from that perspective.
this, cant even have the joy of teaching lazy fuck
Some girls vary massively. I know several that have barely fucked any guys - they only felt comfortable having sex in proper relationships.
I knew a girl who was pretty loose, but even then she only had sex with 1 other guy in the 3 years I knew her, because she was in a LTR.
Some girls are DTF and will fuck 7 different guys in 1 week. Others won't come close to that in their entire lives.
Little update on that poll now.
Yeah I think I will stay single for long time. Only thing whats annoying me is that my parents and friend think I'm gay because of that.
"a guy who has experience" - this fails to make the distinction between fucking 25 girls one time, or fucking one girl 25 times. Which counts as more experienced?
If you've only ever fucked one person, but have been with them for 10 years...you probably know more about pleasing a woman than the 22 year old college frat star who fucked 30 girls over the past year during drunken quickies
>The vast majority of girls want a guy who has experience
Nope. Women don't care as much about sex as having a guy who is successful and will support them.
Oh, I misread. Looks like we agree.
I'm the cuck, yet you want other people involved in my marriage. Faggot.