Why won't the Joker come out as gay already?

Why won't the Joker come out as gay already?

>that paisley
That is clearly Shade disguised as The Joker.

Why you want this?

The Joker reinvents himself every day.

He could be straight one day, gay the next day, bi after that, asexual the after that, and a trigendered pyrofox the day after that.

Because the Joker is only gay for Batman, and nobody else. If Batman were a woman, Joker would be straight for her.

He's not really interested in anyone else. At most, he'll flirt to unnerve people for his own amusement, or use sex to control them (e.g. his "relationship" with Harley Quinn).

If they were German they would doo doo on each other.

>already
Happened 30 years ago, he's only gay for Batman and

Joker as a sexual anything always was weird to me. I always imagined that he doesn't care about anything unless there's a joke in it.

Jokers relationship shouldn't be sexual with Batman, at least in my opinion. There's a lot you can do with it though that is a really easy way to subvert the characters of each.

Which Joker? Are they still doing the three Jokers thing?

Strongly disagree. Every Batman rogue should have an sexual element to them. They should not only pose a danger to Batman's morality but also sexuality.

Batman's pretty much a eight year old boy refusing to grow up and face the ugly world by shielding himself with his hero fantasy brought on by Zorro's tales. You can see that Bruce in his playboy persona plays the role of everything he despise about adulthood: he's vain, he's vapid, he's shallow, he's aimless, he's uncaring, he's an adulterous and so on. Meanwhile Batman's almost ethereal. He's pure. He exemplifies infantile notions of morality.

So when you've enemies like the Joker, Catwoman, Poison Ivy, that not only prey on his sanity and morality, but also sexuality, you've a story where the villains serve as a merge of the ugly reality with the outlandish fantasy. They tempt Batman into bringing himself into the ugly adult world that refuse so much to be a part of. This decadent, opulent and nasty world where there's no right or right and the base instincts rule people's drive.

Because gay male villains aren't progressive

So what would happen if Jason met Harley? Both SS and solo Harley.

Calm down there, Hugo.

Go to bed Wertham.

What dangerous or scary sexual stuff would they each represent? Two-Face might be bisexuality, Ivy tentacle porn, but what about Scarecrow, or the Penguin?

Well, the Joker, for example, is basically preying Batman with his promises of moral and sexuality freedom. He's basically asking a sheltered Christian boy to be free to follow his desires and do whatever he wants. No questions asked and consequences be damned. Which includes butt-sex. He basically serves the role of a gay predator, satanist and so on.

I'd say that Poison Ivy represents the female superiority. She makes Batman feel emasculated with the power of her female sexuality. She's hot, wicked, demanding, controlling and experienced. Batman can't please her. She scares him. So he does everything he can to resist and rebuff her.

Her being a small woman whereas he's a big buff guy makes it all the more overt, since what it counts is the power of her femininity and sexuality, which puts him to shame.

Stop injecting your sexual fantasies on a 80 years old character that on most of his story isn't presented as your headcanon.

This made me kek

This is just you trying to live your sissification fetish on Batman and has barely anything with his famous characterizations.

I don't know why Sup Forums has such shit taste to go after one dimensional characterizations of Batman. Most of his comics on 70s, 80s and 90s had him like a much more normal and stable person, with positive aspects on Gothan and even good personal moments with other characters, like an actual adult.

this