Friendly reminder that the alt-right is just as cucked, at licks just as many boots as the leftists

Friendly reminder that the alt-right is just as cucked, at licks just as many boots as the leftists

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=-xlmU9LvtAs
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_Right
m.imgur.com/a/rGWVT
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

back where i belong

why do you hate roads?

So what's your solution to white genocide then King Weed Noborders?

...

because they are tools of statist oppression

Friendly reminder the "alt right" doesn't exist and anyone that thinks it does is a fucking retard who doesn't understand that "alt right" is just a keyword leftists use to describe people who are anti-establishment.

More like we are the boots.

>noborders
LOLNO

privately owned and enforced border, anyone who violates the NAP by crossing, their deaths are justified

government enforced borders are inherently cucked

>muh roads
not going to have that argument

REEEEE DONT CALL THEM ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS THATS OFFENSIVE

Stay cucked

>Standard Libertarian Party
youtube.com/watch?v=-xlmU9LvtAs

>not going to have that argument
because you can't win it?

Johnson and the libertarian are Statist scum friends

What are you retarded?

Alt-Right was a term coined by Richard Spencer YEARS ago to describe the new anti-liberal white nationalist right wing that had been ejected by the Neo-Cohenservatives.

>privately owned and enforced border
Alright, then what would you call the organizations that hire the private border enforcement that surround a particular geographic region?

...

Where are my fucking ancap memes?

here you go

...

it the biggest non argument ever
you need to prove to me why roads wouldn't exist.
why would private enterprise not create it? There is near infinite demand

...

it doesn't matter what I call them. The owners of that property can call themselves whatever they want

My statism is beddur than yers. Not much lolbergturdianism for the poor who are the majority in your society now is there?
>inb4 societies don't exist

...

...

Alright, well what if they choose to privatize the land they own in order to pay for the border protection?

fine by me, its their land

Johnson is a centrist.

Okay cool. They want to rent the land. They let people live on the land in order for a portion of their income as long as they follow some basic rules. Still good by you?

Most accurate description I've seen.

people could run communist communes, child labor factories, uranium enrichment plants, as long as it is on land they own

I see where you are going

Okay so the entity that owns the large area of land and finances the border parcels out portions to residents and businesses for conditional use, setting aside use as determined by the larger entity. It makes the residents obey certain rules of conduct and collects from them a portion of their income and other service fees.

All good?

Private enterprise wouldn't create it because in your AnCap fantasy land nobody is going to pay for a section of road that is outside their own property. Because there's no state, all the land is privately owned, so each 10km stretch of road needs to be approved and paid for by a different land owner. First of all, to cover any real distance is going to be a logistical nightmare trying to get all parties to agree of where the road will enter and exit their property in places that match their neighbours. But then what happens when one of them tells you to get the fuck off his land? What happens 2 years after the road is built and one of the land owners in the middle decides to dig up his stretch of road? What happens in 10 years when the road needs maintenance but some of the people won't pony up the cash because the investment isn't worth it? All it takes is one person to be a dick and your road network is ruined.

>Not being fash in the current year

>Private enterprise wouldn't create it because in your AnCap fantasy land nobody is going to pay for a section of road that is outside their own property
Not an AnCap but that's objectively false. Large companies have historically cooperated in order to build roads between resources and distribution areas, most notably ports.

The roads we have would all be built as efficiently as possible in order to serve the economic benefits of the ones building it. Local communities would have to pool resources in order to finance major projects doing the same to their residences, in cooperation with local businesses.

yes people can run whatever they want in their private property, i dont see states developing to the size you seem to be implying, considering the fact that land will be up for grabs one the fed is dissolved. Private lands will be found everywhere. every square mile is a city state

someone will obtain all of the property of a road, charge a fee for its use, kill anyone who violates the NAP an gets on the road

people would want these roads to be built, and would sell land to the roadmakers in exchange for reduced road usage fees

i'm an austro libertarian and i find these hilarious

rate mine

>every square mile is a city state
So you DO believe in the state. You believe in governing organizations who own land and who may choose to institute local monopolies on violence in order to maintain order.

AND you believe that the state should be able to physically remove and repel those elements it does not want within the state.

So, if the owners of that city-state wish for their rules-of-conduct to be focused on creating an environment and behavior that is conducive to the survival and success of a similarly-minded or ethnically-alike group of people, that would be kosher yes?

I believe in a state if the owners of that land believe it to be a state

So what happens when you have AnCap, big company comes and buys a shitton of land, and imposes a government-like system upon it?

Does that mean that he or she has effectively created a country? And by consequence, does that mean that earth is just AnCap everywhere, but corporations (governments) own large lands?

So what if the owners of many states choose to form a common pact to create a more stable geographical structure for them each to operate under? They have a inter-state coop of sorts, with some overall rules they decide upon, and some ideas of what kind of states they like to run and how they should be separated from the larger pact.

Sound okay to you?

>every square mile is a city state
until someone buys enough of them to develop a state of their own

And your road plan still hinges entirely upon those people being willing to sell that land. You can't have an efficient road system if the direct route to your destination is being blocked by some stubborn guy that doesn't want a road on his land and refuses to sell.

Sure, large companies have cooperated to build infrastructure, but they were doing it with either state approval or in unclaimed territory. When the fed collapses and the world is being claimed, people aren't just going to leave unclaimed land. All it takes is one land owner to refuse to sell and your road is doomed.

Friendly reminder that the "alt-right" doesn't exist, it is a catch all label similar to the "vast right-wing conspiracy"

> and muh states get larger and larger and larger and larger

this is what delusional statecucks actually believe.
KEK
once people are free from your boot, you will never regain your glory statecuck!

>All it takes is one land owner to refuse to sell and your road is doomed.
I mean you can build around areas of land. That would form a far more organic and (yes) naturally convoluted structure of roadways.

Geographical chokepoints would be the only difficulty, and you know what that just means the land is high-value by nature and the owner will be likely swayed by a substantial enough sum, which I'm sure could be gathered from people for access to such a critical area.

Are you shitposting this in all threads?

Richard Spencer came up with the term the "alternative right" years ago.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_Right

I'm not a statecuck, just curious.

shit, didnt mean to reply to you

was meant for

how to spot a nigger 101: use of the word "bootlicker"

That's exactly what happened to the country you live in, burgerbro

But if you're being forced to build diversions around unfriendly land owners, you aren't producing an efficient road system.

how to spot a bootlicker 101
>he licks boots

its ok though authoritarian swine, you could join whatever community oppresses you in whatever way you like

and 1776 is coming again, only with more knowledge and experience this time

No, user is not retarded. Officially, publicly, the "alt-right" DOES NOT EXIST.

So now you know, faggot.

Not an argument.

>left-lib
>bootlicker
whew laddie

If you notice how outlandish the terms of this being a possibility and how it would never happen like this, you leave behind your doubts and lack of mental clarity and realize the AnCap philosophy is harmonious with natural law.

>and 1776 is coming again, only with more knowledge and experience this time
Dear God, I hope so.

Also no one is Alt-right here

We're literally just trolls.

Well I guess I lick boots. Uh oh. What should I do now? Become chaotic neutral and support AnCaps?

10/10

I used to be an ancap, but arguments like these pulled me back into reality

Well that's where prices come into play. If the land is more valuable than the cost of going around it and the forward cost of using a less efficient road, then the prices will show that. Maybe the chokepoint is in the mountains, and it just takes increased investment to produce a tunnel.

There is no perfectly efficient system, the free market is a system that fails constantly but in such a way that people create wealth while building subsystems that inevitably fail.

Jesus Christ, you fuckers are stupid. In AnCap, THE FUCKING REAL ESTATE COMPANIES BUILD THE FUCKING ROADS FOR THEIR PROPERTY! MALLS, STRIP MALLS, GYMS, GROCERY STORES, APARTMENT COMPLEXES, AND 99% OF NEW HOMES ARE MANAGED BY REAL ESTATE COMPANIES TRYING DESPERATELY TO GET PEOPLE TO VISIT THEIR LOTS. How many private individuals actually own a home without HOA membership in a major metropolitan area?

None of those hypothetical bridge trolls niggerloving leftists bitch about even live in Brooklyn, SF, or Austin anyway, so why the fuck do they care?

Jesus, Ivan, where did you come from? Do you call all of your friends 'comrade' too?

...

So his argument against deportation is "it's not easy to do so why bother?" And apparently it wasn't illegal to to enter the US illegally decades ago?

But it's not just about the initial investment of building the road further to go around the obstacle, it's also the increased maintenance costs on the road, the increased fuel usage of the vehicles, increased staffing to police the borders of the road, increased wear and tear of the vehicles themselves. In some areas AnCap would get lucky and create the perfect straight line route from A to B, but the majority of the time it's going to be a fucking mess.

>the real eSTATE companies build the infrastructure
just sounds like council housing to me senpai

You should go watch Menace II Society (aka the truth about niggers), stop licking Jamal's cum out of your wife's pussy, and get AIDS treatment before it's too late.

>Nazism
>economically right wing

when will this meme die

but the further down you go on the political compass the less likely you are to have roads

All my friends are "actual" libertarians, classical liberals or liberal cucks. So no, no I don't.

Being associated with progressives makes me want to kill myself. I'd fuck Shkreli, is that wrong?

I'd never associate with anyone who supports polyamory.

...

Where I live none of the roads are very straight. It's not perfectly efficient but we still get from A-B.

Private roads could be easily funded with tolls, subscriptions, advertising, etc. I know the idea of "competing roads" might be freakish to you but it's also an entirely viable idea. I know I can already take multiple highways to the same place, and use them at different times for different reasons, they'd just be owned by different people.

...

These ancap memes are fucking cancerous. They aren't even funny. And I've never been ancap in my life.

At least the ones mocking communism or ancom are genuine satire and not fucking straw men.

ok wheres the guy that makes these threads daily and has a folder of all the Responses that people give?

topkek dataminer

but more likely to have bitcoin saved.

you won't need roads in a few years with that

HOAs are almost exclusively an American problem. Also, home ownership is about 65% in both the UK and USA at the moment so it stands to reason that at least a small portion of those living in major metropolitan areas DO own their own homes. I know my whole family do, and it's the same for most of the people I know. I personally rent, but from a private landlord, not a HOA style group.

Not subisdized housing, yuckmouth. HOAs are part of a voluntary contract in purchasing a house

Also, all you dumb lefties bitching about "WHO WILL PAY FOR THE ROADS" never seem to mention that a 2-lane road only costs about $100k/mi to pave. You simply start by building your property as close to the best part of town as possible, pave the 1/4mi between the nearest road and your place, then let people drive through your road to use your business. If you want a toll, good luck because you'll never sell jack shit.

Or better yet, there are these wonderful things called PRIVATE TOLL ROADS, and THEY ARE 10,000x BETTER THAN SHITTY PEASANT ROADS. Trust me, paying $2.00 to drive on one is better than a bent axle from hitting a pothole on a shitty public road.

These ones? I think this is the only one I have. I saw one about Ukraine that made me laugh pretty hard.

>anyone who violates the NAP by crossing, their deaths are justified
Man this thread was really just as subtle begging for posting ancap memes wasn't it?

because the alt right is just another word for the left leaning wing of the political right
there is no alt right there is just right. And the principles the right stands for do not move
hint; national socialism is not right its alt right

Natsoc here, r8 me.
My answers: m.imgur.com/a/rGWVT

The idea of competing roads isn't freakish, we have private roads and toll roads in the UK. Not as rampant as in the US, but we do have them. The thing is I'm not going to pay to use a road when the state has already built one that is just as good. Near me there's a privately built bridge across a river that has a toll booth, but when they built it there was already a state owned bridge less than a mile away. They built the bridge 20 years ago and they haven't made their money back yet.

I believe that, I don't like Ancap memes

Alt right is an alternative to the mainstream cuckservatives.

Someome creates a new one

X axis: Dislike Trump 《》Like Trump
Y axis: Dislike Putin 《》 Like Putin

>The thing is I'm not going to pay to use a road when the state has already built one that is just as good.
People send their kids to private schools even though there are state schools available. The public ones aren't as good.

Why would roads be different from schools in this regard?

>They built the bridge 20 years ago and they haven't made their money back yet.
I wonder how much of a burden the state is putting on that profit.

...

reference

>NatSoc
>dude weed lmao
>doesn't want a one party state
>wants people to question authority and doesn't think making people with the establishment is mature
hate to break it to you mate, you're not NatSoc.

reference #2

Allmost identical to me Lad I r8 it 14/88. I would want Mosleys Syndicalism for my own country, ideally but Natsoc is the best option for Europe. The U.S.A. and other countries can fuck off lel, I don't give a shit about them.

If you aren't around this region you should literally kill yourself

I knew he was a cuck but jesus christ that's bernie tier.

>Wanting to send to to prison over a plant that harms no one
A on party state would be great if it's all natsoc politicians, but can you imagine a one party Democrat state? A one party state of all Bernie Sanders? The problem with this question is it doesn't give a party, saying yes would be saying you are okay with any party ruling you.

People should question authority and be against the establishment. Trump is against the establishment now, and Hitler was against the establishment then. The establishment is full of nothing but corrupt politicians that just want to continue the status quo, and a natsoc takeover would be radical change and completely destroy the establishment.

If private schools are so much better, why do state schools still exist? There's obviously still a demand for them. And the reason that bridge isn't making any money is because they built it in a low demand crossing area and right next to a pre-existing free to use bridge. The state isn't the burden, their own stupidity is.

Heil!

>the state isn't a burden
>as the private school pays it dues to the state, and play by many of the states rules and standards

The state IS a massive burden, lets not forget. Those men built a massive structure spanning a river and their profit is being taken to subsidize Achmed's child brides.

State schools exist because states want schools and want them to have as many people in them as possible and collect taxes by force to fund the schools and then force the residents of the state to send their kids to school.

You and I both know that if the debt burden, income taxes, and property taxes necessary for the welfare state and the public school system did not exist then that would be reflected in the rents of even the poor and that extra money could be used to send their children to cost-effective economy-of-scale private schools of their choosing.

> Muhh don't do anything and let 6 trillion immigrants will somehow save the white race
You retarded nigga.

Whether the plant causes any physical damage isn't the reason NatSoc wouldn't legalise it, it's the social degradation that comes with it.
NatSoc isn't about destroying the establishment. If anything, fascism is about extending the reach of the establishment for the good of the people.