All confirmed leaders of Civ 6 so far

What does Sup Forums think of this series, and will this game be any good?

Still no revolutionary, greatest leader on this planet, Chairman Mao Tse-tung? This is disgusting

>Germany
>Barbosa
They couldn't find a real German leader?

why do we always get queens for our leaders? is it because its a guaranteed stronk womyn they can use

boring t b h

Wow they kept Cleopatra her historical color

Based

why is cleopatra not black? this some kind of racist game?

WE HAVE THIS THREAD EVERY DAY

WHO THE FUCK MAKES THESE???

phillip II was blond

we wuz nords n shiet

>france

lol are you fucking joking

>you will never lead Chile as Pinochet or Spain as Franco

The last good civ was civ 3.

That's exactly what it is.

At least they didn't make y'all niggers in this one lmao.

>germany not bismarck or wilhelm
wew

They need to include as many female leaders as they can. At least Victoria and Elizabeth were important and actually in charge, as opposed to Catherine de Medici.

why it's always Gandhi ? It's the only PitL worth mentionning ?

some day they will realize...

No idea. My best guess is CTR sliding.

Has India ever not gotten Ghandi? I feel like he's included solely because muh nukes maymay.

Victoria was based, way better than the french/Dutch faggots that ruled before her.

I hope they add a bulgarian leader

>and will this game be any good?
no, only after 2 expansions that will come. that was always the case and its Firaxis marketing strategy
>you only paid for 'just a game'. you want a good game? pay more for the 'good' part

Same shit again except this time ripping off of Endless Legend and hoping nobody notices

Why isn't cleopatra Macedonian?

Also, I get that it's a meme and all, but why won't they gonna drop Gandhi for some other Indian leader? When are we gonna see a civ game use Prithviraj Chauhan or something?

Everybody except Gandhi and Medici are OK, Aztecs shouldn't be in the game.

Christ the art style is just such dog shit

das my girl mane

>learn to spot the difference
ftfy, it sounds weird like it is

They've had Bismarck in the past. He invented Germany

Who would you pick for them, bulgarianon?

No Alberto Barbosa? I'm disappointed.

Aztecs will never leave, nobody else in Central America was worth a damn. Plus muh jaguars.

Cmon mayne don't y'all niggas look like Antonio banderes or some shit

>Japan
>Triforce on his robe

Typical Japs and their video games

Poo in who?

I agree, why did they decide clash of clans aesthetic was going to please the fans, or even attract new ones?

muh unit stacks

Why no Aztecs? They were a civilization.

Qin Shi Huang looks like Orson Welles.

They both look like George Zimmerman

Olmecs/modern Mexico could both reasonably be included. They're about as relevant as the Aztecs.

Thats the symbol of the hojo clan pham

why is Teddy so fat?

First person that comes to mind would be Simeon the Great

Barbarians have no faction leader in civ

All the Aztecs did was rip out hearts for 2000 years, didn't even invent the wheel.

I believe it's in our mutual interest to allow free passage between our two great empires.

Just his brother Frederick

t. Frederick Barbarossa

I believe he's their new opening batsman

>look mom I posted this shit thread again

sage

who cares there no black people and the egyptian is white.

>Catherine de Medici
>not even French

tfw Frenchies can't even get a leader from their own country

>Cleopatra isn't black

Scythians lived mainly in Europe. West of the Urals, north of Caucacus is Europe.

Aztecs were shit. They got taken over by Cortez and one car load of spics

Why do they look like wax sculptures? This is some uncanny valley shit, creepy as fuck.

You guys are really good at squatting today, if it's any consolation

He was a Hindu king of Delhi who unified the northern Indians and attempted to hold off the Muslim expansion into India with some success. Admittedly he ultimately failed, but he's a somewhat notable leader and it'd provide some nice variation from yet another Gandhi.

Super cartoony and characatured. As if a 7 year old would be able to understand the game mechanics

he cracked open a few too many bears

After beyond earth I'm skeptic to say the least.

...

I don't know. Possibly because the British Empire at its peak was ruled by a woman (as in: head of state).

I've played every civ game from the first one onward. Can't really see how this can be bad, it's a pretty simple game system and thus hard to fuck up.

This man was clearly around for the Civ V and Civ IV launches and speaks the truth.

Are you talking about Sachin Tendulkar? This guy has convinced me you are talking about Sachin Tendulkar

They made some cities but they weren't any place you'd want to live. Savage as fuck were the Aztecs. Subhumans.

Because the most well-known british male monarch was a literal cuck

Teddy Roosevelt looks like the guy on mount rushmore

>cleopatra decked out in all that shit as if she wasn't a hellenic blooded aristocrat

ree, I guess.

>Civ 7 first Character revealed.

Thank you sand person

based teddy

BTW some civs are confirmed to have 2 leaders so there is still hope for France.

>Scythia
literally fanfiction
It's not real just because it's in the Bible, christcucks.

>most well-known british male monarch

Richard the Third was a beast, don't you dare insult King Hunchback.

Aztecs are a fan favorite because Monty is fun to draw, and he has become associated with an insane warmongering personality in the series which is always entertaining.

Oh, sorry, I was a little shaky on the spelling, thanks for the correction user!

That actually sounds pretty cool. I doubt it'd happen, but I hope we see a Bulgarian civ anyway.

I don't understand why they use Ghandi as a leader anyways? He was NEVER a leader of India? That would be like having Martin Luther Koon Jr. as leader of the USA.

>Cant stump the Trump
>Get +1 production/gold/faith in Capital for every denunciation

>implying ghandi wasnt black

hol up

WE
E

I dream of a day where developers are not scared enough to let Hitler be an actual faction leader in their strategy games

>Philip II
ok
>Medici
worst leader choice. obvious gender quota
>Victoria
pretty good choice
>Barbarossa
Probably among my favorite choices this far
>Qin shi
Good choice
>Hojo
Don't know shit about him
>Tomyris
Probably a gender quota but i like schytia and it's fun with new civs that haven't been in the series before. So i'l give her a pass.
>Gandhi
Shitty meme leader. Muh nuke jokes are cancer
>Roosenvelt
Good
>Pedro II
Brazil is pretty uninteresting. Should have waited until an expansion or something
>Montezuma
Ok. he is like the only known aztec leader anyways
>Cleopatra
bad and obvious gender quota

Guys, I managed to footage from diplomatic screen for Turkey's leader

>what is hearts of iron

Wait around 400 years, Genghis Khan eventualy became PC so everybody can become PC.

Russia used to have Stalin.

It'll never happen because everyone would either cry about it or exclusively play hitler.

> t. Disraeli

I'm fine with the US being represented by perhaps our most badass president.

>will this game be any good?
If it's anything like 5, no.

And I'm very happy we don't anymore

>2 leaders
How would that work? A regular leader for most of the game and a bonus revolutionary leader for late game? Like, you have Catherine de Medici until a certain point, and then you can switch to Robespierre by focusing on certain liberty related policies? [spoiler]Uncle Adolf unlock for Germany when?[/spoiler]

+10 wall against invaders.

Problem is that most of the developers are bluepilled as fuck.

You can choose before the game I think, like in Civ 4.

hey, its Suleiman! good choice

Are you telling me Spanish people are more Aryan than Germans.
Nice try shitposting southerner

That's a wwii game tho. He means a history spanning one

got you senpai

why

Russia's greatest leader was the one who raped the serfs

get that banana gurl

>Cultural enrichment DLC coming soon