> What is your opinion on lynching thieves/ pedos/ rapists? Is it a justifiable punishment?
What is your opinion on lynching thieves/ pedos/ rapists? Is it a justifiable punishment?
Other urls found in this thread:
Mob rule is literally nigger-tier
It is acceptable if you are a mob tier society. However, if you believe in the rule of Law and trust your system to administer Justice it has no place in your life.
Absolutely not. It's far too easy to rile up a crowd and lynch innocent people. It happens all the time in pretty much every Islamic country.
>thieves
No
>Pedos
Yes
>rapist
No
Thieves and rapists should be flogged instead.
FPBP
Also this
For it
Vigilantism should be an acceptable defence in a court of law
explain?
Wow, stupid nigs, you can't just go rounding up and killing people just for their gender or sexual orientation.
Is this your home town OP ?
if you lynch an innocent person you could be prosecuted for murder
It's unnecessary. The law punishes those sorts of people.
Politicians, bankers and pundits should be lynched, though
what if it is the guy who raped and killed your mother and you are absolutely sure it is him?
>Pedophile but not rapist
>age matters
> The law punishes those sorts of people.
Not always
what about countries where law doesn´t works? (like mine)... wouldnt it bother you to know a rapist or an assassin is just going to serve 1 year and then go back to the streets?
Yes.
It is the birth of French/Brit law.
A jury of his peers, with equal and fair representation from both parties.
No.
Civilization can't function without law and order.
it's interesting that you bring this up now - #BlackLivesMatter is trending in Australia right now.
Why?
A couple of days ago an Aboriginal stole a motorbike. The owner chased him down and ran over him with his pickup truck.
He was promptly arrested, jailed and charged with manslaughter and other offenses.
Aboriginals showed up to the court house and proceeded to violently riot, attacking police cars and property.
Why?
Because "black lives matter", and thus justice must be served. Yet the suspect was already in custody and going through the legal proceedings. So what did they mean by justice?
Lynching.
Lynching and vigilante justice in general means one of two things; You're either niggers, or your society has collapsed to the point where the government is unable to fulfill their duties and provide satisfactory law and order.
The two often seem to have great overlap.
Rapists and murderers should be executed in a private manner with minimal pain.
Harmless pedophiles should be scorned, but not punished.
>Civilization can't function without law and order.
You can still have law and order
It would be just like self defense
Something that would make the homicide justifiable
Its only trending on twotter m8.
No one actually takes it seriously. We all know deep down Abos are scum. Not even my leftie friends give a shit about them.
If he ran over a white man do you think this case would still have such a repercussion?
Wow OP you're such a nigger, there is a reason why law and the court system exist, among other things it is there to provide adequate sentencing. You can't just burn a man alive because he fingered a drunk girl and she then regretted it and cried Rape
Mob rule is fucking vile, anybody can make any kind of accusation and if they have enough strength of personality they could easily get a mob to lynch a completely innocent person. Civilized societies make laws which we all agree on, we hire and train certain individuals to understand those laws and they along with a group of the accused's peers will determine if they are actually guilty of an infraction by examining the evidence for and against that person, that person will then be subjected to an agreed upon punishment which is meted out only if they can be proven guilty. It isn't a perfect system, it can be abused and corrupted, but i'd bet money that is produced vastly better results than "hey I accuse that guy of something, lets go hang him and not bother to think about whether or not he actually did it!"
Courts and prison is expensive and should only step in when people cannot handle things themselves
if you kill your enemies, they win
If you lynch the wrong person you could still be tried for murder
>Thinking that a person's natural situational group mentality will always be curbed by the fear of punishment
>Literally female-tier
It's murder both ways.
Completely innefficient.
Stab an artery and the subhuman die in less than thirty seconds, with loss of consciousness in less than 5 seconds.
thats fucking retarded
I just hope you are kidding
>Civilized societies make laws which we all agree on
I dunno about you, but I didn't agree to any of the laws I'm currently forced to follow. I also wasn't consulted about them.
hownew.ru
this
that is how it is now
if you lynch someone you can be tried for murder
the only thing I would change is lynching a criminal would be an acceptable defence in court
It shouldn't be just like if you kill someone that breaks into your house its not murder
Lynching is nigger behavior and has a really high chance of killing innocent people. Give them a fair trial just like everyone else and then you can beat or burn them to death.
not really
how many innocent people have been lynched?
I don't support lynchings but I DO support public hangings. Only after appropriate trial
>thieves
Put them in prison. Unless it's politicians stealing millions from people. Rope for them.
>pedos
rope
>rapists
rope for real deal ... not that femnazis bullshit.
yes it is the appropriate punishment
who are you quoting tho?
>and trust your system to administer Justice
This is the problem. The government sends them away to rehabilitation for a few years and then inflicts them on us again. Or doesn't even imprison them at all if they are of politically correct immigration status. They have not done a single damn thing to take care of those muslim rapist children and their parents in Idaho. Only thing left is a tree and a noose.
There isn't any opportunity for a person's group mentality to manifest itself in the same way that lynching inevitably would. No-one does it now because lynching is illegal. If it was legal, group mentality would override the fear of punishment.
>what about countries where law doesn´t works? (like mine)
he said people not monkeys
Probably millions since all you need to do if you want to lynch someone is spread a rumor around the neighborhood that he's a rapist or a pedo and eventually you'll have enough to make a lynch mod. You don't even need to have any actual evidence since most people are retards with hive minds who will believe anything, just ask any guy who has ever been jailed for rape just because he had a disagreement with his gf and she told everyone he raped her.
lynch mob*
Justice cannot be served by a mob. Sorry huehues. Your shit is kangaroo court.
If you get enough people to agree with you about what should be changed you can. The system relies on you not being a lazy piece of shit who will never vote for it to be altered in any significant way. If you don't like a law, start getting together a group of likeminded people and when you have enough then you can try and get it changed. People who refuse to participate have zero right to complain.
All you edgy teens saying lynching is nigger behaviour. I'll let you cunts think for yourselves and realise how it isn't exclusive to them...
>protip:america
Non violent theft can just be fines.
Pedos and rapists (only in the remaining societies without feminazis) should be brutally killed. The parents and children should also be sterilized in cases of ephebophilia since at that point the child should have already been taught responsible behavior.