Suddenly all mainland states are at war with each other

Suddenly all mainland states are at war with each other.
Which state would win and take over the nation?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/eIqESwzCGg4
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

new yerk :3

IOWA

obviously.


GOOD LUCK FEEDING YOURSELVES, REST OF AMERICA LMAO

Minnesota would nuke the cheeseniggers and then sit out of the war while generally being uninvadvable because of the weather

Faggot

>minnesota
>implying you're not all zoomalians by now

kek fuck off new sweden.

h'HAAA

Utah. Mormons are crazy. They will blow themselves up in the name of Smith at random locations

new york would conquer all east of mississippi
california would conquer west
texas would be a holdout but couldnt conquer shit

>All you have is corn.

California, Texas, Nebraska, Minnesota, Illinois, Kansas, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Indiana would be fine.

We raise more cattle and hogs than any other state.

Iowa feeds the world faggot.

Virginia my state i live within 5 miles of 3 army and navy bases plus all the ex military

Cali has the bases, highway, rail, and sea access. They have large Naval Bases and Carriers, Marines at Stumps and Pendleton. They have Ft. Irwin that has a BCT whose job is to kill conventional US military forces via war gaming. Terrain, climate, population.

Texas or Montana.

Can't imagine that Texas would do poorly. But then again, it depends hugely on how many people in each state are actually willing to fight. In USA as a whole only 44% would be willing to fight for USA, so I'd wager the number would drop pretty radically if they're suddenly fighting for states independence.

Whichever state has the most people and guns

The Nebraska Iowa alliance is real. Omaha steaks motherfucker

Wouldn't that mean you're a more valuable asset to destroy to cripple states that can't produce their own food?

>tfw no great lakes union

My state, Montana, has shitloads of nukes. Come at us faggots

Also we love your casinos

Virginia's marines would conquer the US of the A
>pic: that's your new country's flag

yeah Iowa is fucked. Any "garden state" is fucked faster than you can say "launch the nukes!"

california

are you high? its a hmong problem we have, not somalian. Besides, blacks only live here for like a year before they realize they arent build for anything further than 1000 miles from the equator

Texas 100%

probably texas, but texas would gain support from virtually all southern states once they band together. making a state up of 130 million people, with this mega state they would conquer the rest of the US.

Texas or california

Virginia

>abundant military bases

>Space port

>largest naval installation in the world

>top tier agriculture

>high yet manageable population

>complete agronomic, infrastructural, industrial, logistical, and human capital self reliance

>Military academies

>extremely high numbers of officers and enlisted personnel, retired and active

>significant numbers of leaders and peons

>ethnographic diversity

>highest density of military contractors

>best and most intel sites
(and before some plebeian faggotron says Mu NSAs, they get a ton of raw and crunching from the NRO, which was hackering the mainframes before it was cool)

>international trade deals and foreign populations
(indispensable for alliance and partnership forming)

>natural geographic barriers and North Carolina is just South VA anyway.

>natural leadership
(significantly more presidents from VA than any other state

The robot ghost of Robert E. Lee

Face it Faggots. The Commonwealth is the natural Dominant.

Obviously michigan. We have 2 peninsulas and a Canadian border. We'd be the kurdistan of this conflict.

Not when Minnesota expands it's territory South. You flatlanders will be enslaved.

Texas is one of the 3 electrical grids in USA. Texas has guns. Texas is Texas. Texas will win.

no one state could win. it would take a multi state alliance to btfo of the rest.

Why can't we have multiple new countries?
New England, Dixie, GLU, Greater California, etc.
What else would there be?

Missouri obviously

texas obviously

>meanwhile Minnesota pushes your shit in like a bully taking a nerd's lunch money

What? If anything the breadbasket states would be neutral and sell food to the fuckhuge states that might have the tech and manpower but are only a week from starvation.

We need to use all we have. This is meme warfare. We need to make Jeb memes look like child's play.

>Texas
>35% white

lol Texas is a fucking meme Sweden. It only survives in Euro's minds because of 1950's movies.

nevada says hello?

> WWIII / Global war / war in US

If you are a pacifist, and watch the world burning eating popcorn without chimpout or war battles, what's the best place to be ?

>house with one acre, some cows, and potential food/water autonomous
>small town with based small community
>weapons

Michigan has the only standing militia in the United States that has full military training.

Oregon + New York + Texas

Farmer revolt in all 3 and then we expand out towards the center of the country.

Citizen paramilitary groups would play a big part in a war like this and the closest thing California will have to that is a bunch of bix noods and Juans fighting each other over gang territory.

California Über Alles

youtu.be/eIqESwzCGg4

Scorched earth. Enjoy eating snow and whatever vermin you can poach.

>minnesota
>aka new sweden

Lol you bitch faggots won't do shit besides ask your governor to bring more refugees in! kek

East Tennessee as the state of Franklin, because we're all Sup Forumsock /k/ommandos, have mountains and dense forests, a prepper/patriot culture, and extensive hydroelectric infrastructure. We could be the American Switzerland.

No Utah will win because
>Mormons are prepared for food shortages and are pro-gun
>Rocky mountains will keep the filth out
>Whatever gets past the rockies still has to make it past the gun toting rural towns before they make it to the salt lake valley
>We get to test out whatever the gubments been hiding in Dugway(new area 51) on the rest of the nation

Farmland is important and would be contested
What you really want is mountainous terrain or place that is hard to access/has few resources
So somewhere like Appalachia or high Sierra Nevadas

Alabama. we will fuck our sisters and cousins and make an invincible army of mutant retards

Canada would swoop in and take over everyone, just like Macedonia did to the Greek states.

THUS FAR:

New York: 02
Iowa: 01
Minnesota: 01
Utah: 01
California: 05
Texas: 06
Virginia: 03
Montana: 02
Michigan: 02
Missouri: 01
Nevada: 01
Tennessee: 01
Alabama: 01


It is so obviously VA it hurts.

>Texas would split immediately then go to war with itself

>California would starve and orgy so fast that Mexico would seal the border with a condom wall

Alaska and Hawaii are the only winners

not to mention the fact that they breed like rats

new idea: a president from each state, one every election cycle, chosen by the residents of that state. state order to be picked by random algo.

Georgia.
The combination of our niggers and white trash rednecks makes us a very dangerous state.

Don't listen to the first guy he's a faggot

>diversity
Dropped. Faggot.

Western Canada will team up with Washington and establish cascadia

I'd bet on Texas expanding into the Lone Star Republic and Utah into a Mormon nation, both by into the great plains for the fertile farmland. Other than that i dont really know.

Absolutely critical to forming a dictatorial hierarchy. if you have purity, it is very hard to delegate shit jobs. but you wouldn't know this because you have never left your suburb. Stop thinking like a pawn and start thinking like the queen your father always knew you'd become.

MINNESOTA

>Send Somali Jihad akbar to Wisconsin because fuck them

>Easily invade flatlanders of North Dakota and take over nukes.

>Nuke everyone

>Cucked Minnesota wins

Depends on who controls middle America. Flyover states won't stand a chance against the richer states like Texas, California, Florida, etc. All that fertile land will be invaluable.
Judging by proximity and strength, I'd say Texas would begin face rolling the others

If you mean dangerous to be in, sure.

>implying niggers wouldn't just rape and pillage their own state

Wow you guys are fucking retarded. Michigan, hands down. Fortify the southern border and were set. Let everyone else david duke it out and then we blitzkrieg. Not to mention canada takes up much of our border

>Texas

see

Would eventually devolve into this.

Texas. They've got nukes, armor and infantry plus the only nuclear reprocessing plus refineries plus attitude.

This.

Ido Texas maybe?

Minnesota ' s border crosses into Canada. What does Canada have anything to do with it? We have the nukes on our doorstep.

Then we will have the Yoopers turn on mainland Michigan. Game over.

VA. Definitely.

minnesota

Colorado, our desert mountain fortress and farmlands will be unbeatable

Clearly Utah, the best state.

...

In all honesty California fags.

dumb animeposter
dumb ghettoposter

everyone ITT is thinking about the first days of fighting

>nukes are useless here as ICBMs would require retargeting and where are those computers?
NRO

>food + water would be the biggest concern so if a state cannot feed itself it is out because muh civil wars
VA again

>having troops is one thing, training the next crop is entirely another
Oh shit waddup its dat Commonwealth

>quality of life would pull in all of the best and brightest
lemme hear you say NOVA

>after settling border disputes, expansion is key, and that will be done through trade and negotiation
when the rest of you shit tier states were collapsing in 08, VA's economy was expanding. after Civil War, VA was back on par with NE in less than 10 years

face it faggots. VA is Best State. my power is overwhelming

Texas has a lot of military things inside of it, very large state and very high population. They would win assuming nobody would team up

Because defeating an army who have weed rations would be so difficult.

texas has all the guns right? im gonna go with texas. do i get a prize?

Do all Midwesterners say this about their State?

I've had someone from ND say the exact same thing

Texas
>Most active duty army and air force personnel
>Largest reserve of tanks in the country at Fort Hood, also the only military base in the country with enough supplies to support two full armored divisions.
>Only nuclear weapons assembly plant in the country
>Large amounts of arable land, and large enough industrial base to support war effort.
>Bountiful natural resources, including oil and natural gas.
>Only state with electric grid separate from the rest of the country.

Lol this delusional cuck

Go back to sucking somali dick faggot.

>Texas
>35% white

Lol go kill yourself juan.

>Livermore

Probably Commiefornia.

I swear to God, after we stem roll the Ohio filth, you michicux are next.

Naturally, we won't even have to invade Flint or Detroit, theyve already fallen to your corrupt Michigan ways.

Michael Moore would make demoralizing anti war propaganda, also hurting your cause.

Face it, Indiana is destined to rule you're mitten shaped fuck hole state. Surrender, and we might let you keep the UP.

Nebraska has 6.3 million head of cattle, slightly more than Kansas at 6 million head. Nearly 14% of the cattle in the United States are in Nebraska and Kansas. The top 10 states with the most cattle include: Texas, Nebraska, Kansas, California, Oklahoma, Missouri, Iowa, South Dakota, Wisconsin & Colorado.

Pretty much this. If the states military forces went with each state no defecting these would be the powerhouses for military power.


California: 190,160
Texas: 173,118
North Carolina: 129,049
Virginia: 117,084
Florida: 94,288
Georgia: 88,521
Washington: 65,731
New York: 50,824
South Carolina: 50,426
Hawaii: 49,347
Maryland: 49,187

Also California has Vandenberg Air Force Base which can also launch space based items.

In all honestly, California would overrun everything west of the Rockies, Take Alaska and cut off Hawaii until they surrendered.

Texas would overrun the South, and the end game would probably look like this assuming nukes went used. Because then the Dakotas would ruin the world.

Texas. Has oil, few serious threats nearby, massive economy and military bases. California is a second bet, but has to deal with Nevada first and foremost.

But the real winner in an American civil war is Canada

>>food + water would be the biggest concern so if a state cannot feed itself it is out because muh civil wars

That's why breadbasket states will be major battlegrounds, anyone not in direct vicinity (VA) is fucked

yellow would be easily the best to live in as of now but blue would win easily. 3 of the 4 most populated states (CA, TX, FL). Nearly half of the us population

Nah Texas is a meme britbro. Even Brazil is more white than they are.

Not sure of those other states but literally all of the bottom half of Minnesota is corn. Illinois has lots of corn too from my general knowledge

kek what no we won't.

we have gunz though. unfortunately some coastal state would win because they have the military stuff

this guy mad as shit that indiana is even worse than Michigan of all places, which is riddled with niggers and mudslimes

all the faggots saying CA or TX are thinking outward. those 2 would almost immediately collapse into civil unrest.

Also, soldiers would most likely return home, not stay where they were stationed, so the numbers need to be calculated by origin, not placement

Appalachia, tobacco country, James River, Potomac River, Blue Mtns. It isnt just having or producing food. it is processing, distributing, and having enough surplus to store it. VA is in the sweet spot in terms of arable land, clean water, geographic placement, and logistical/infrastructural scalability.

We have oil.
We have ocean.
We have industry.
We have Marines, Airforce, Army, Navy.
We have industry.
We have overseas power.
We have the best flag.

you lose.