How does Sup Forums feel about censoring the human body and it's functions?

How does Sup Forums feel about censoring the human body and it's functions?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=YHU_KLYhibI
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Censoring nudity is dumb, we shouldn't be so afraid of the naked body in our media

doesnt matter how you feel

unsexual, unattractive people will ALWAYS censor the body

it will never, ever be changed

you will never blow a conch on the face of a naked girl in the middle of a sea of naked children

I think it's off topic

How? There is plenty of censorship in comics and cartoons

more like there is plenty of censorship american comics and cartoons. other countries don't give a fuck

As a nudist, I can't stand it.

I barely see any comics from outside America on Sup Forums so it's relevant.

Wtf are those cherubic little shits doing to that dolphin in the lower right?

it looks like they are stabbing him with his own flipper, that part always bothered me about this specific painting

Stupid.

Nothing should be censored.

I think it's exaggerated. I mean, we can even talk about fully clothed characters that are heavily censored.

Executives looks like being afraid of boobs for just being there giving women a hourglass shape.

It's pretty laughable.

censoring it's important for keeping a country free and safe

How
We're talking bodily censorship btw

exactly, nudity is the source of all evil and must be covered at all cost

It's like when you hear a rap song public access and half the song is silenced out.

>this guy is butt naked right now posting on Sup Forums

It angers the fuck outve me. But prudes and soccor moms have exsisted in some form or another for thousands of years. We as a society need to ignore them and stop catering to them.

Most people are fugly under the clothes.

I think things are fine the way they are

you mean you are not?

that's a society where Sup Forums is more popular/accepted than reddit or tumblr

a society which will never exist

i'm at work so I gotta wear clothes

Censoring is fine if the intention of the subject is to be sexual.
It's not fine if the subject is nude for the purpose of symbolism or artistic reasons.

protestants should all fucking die desu

>Most people are fugly under the clothes.
So? People are fugly with cloths on.

>Censoring is fine if the intention of the subject is to be sexual.
Why

Because faggots are obsessed with jerking off to non-H shit.

if we promoted sex from a very early age, kids would be 15, broke, and have a 2 year old child, and repeat this 100,000 times and the world is a lot more fucked than it was when we were putting black bars on a pair of cartoon breasts

I'm all for abolishing it. Maybe then audiences will become so desensitized that creators will stop trying to cover the flaws of their work with pointless sex appeal.

Clothes are cheaper than heating bills.

>tfw heat is 100% included in my rent
get fucked homeowners

Leaking and evacuating fluids is like, the only thing that the human body is actually good at.

It's a shame that melinnias of human culture have been spent pretending that is a bad or shameful thing.

Can you prove that claim?

yes, end censoring and screencap my post :)

>live in a tropical country
>don't care about heat
did you have to ride in your dog sled to work this morning?

not an argument

Get a load of this Sup Forums refugee who has no idea how comprehensive sex education works!
I'm so sorry that you're actually from a third-world country. Time to rip that band-aid off now.

i dont know which piece of this projecting i should pick apart first

I remember a story of a French Comic author who was asked to censor some of his work for the electronic version on Apple because nudity is considered as pornography

I'm naked pretty often while browsing Sup Forums, sometimes jackin it as well.

>Browsing Sup Forums at work
You are a bad employee

>soccer mom
>your mom
>the women you'll likely marry.

Pick three.

I'm naked pretty often because it's the house I build with my own mexican underpaid workers and I do as I want in my house

I sleep naked, but that's pretty much it. I do wear pajama pants all the time; you won´t ever catch me wearing anything acceptable in the street while I´m at home.

Actually it is pretty well understood the longer people abstain the more likely they are to have an unwanted pregnancy and/or get an STD. People are people, and you know what?
people like to fuck.
Waiting until you're 22 to fuck doesn't make you like it any less than you would have at 17, but you are in a far more promoscuous and disease ridden ecology than you are 17. So when most people are setteling down the late bloomer is fucking dirty, dirty, dirty pigs and as many as he or she can get.
abstinence is for neckbeards, because they can maintain it without effort. It's not for real people who can get laid, because they will, get laid, I mean. It is literally why you have a body.

youtube.com/watch?v=YHU_KLYhibI

Everyone knows that non-sexual nudity should be acceptable, but they're too afraid of offending a certain audience group (religious people) and losing money. So they censor it.

Gross. I hate when people are talking with me either on the internet or phone and fapping at the same time. Like, what the hell? The fuck, man? I'm talking to you. You don't jerk-off while i'm talking to you. QTF.

>non-sexual nudity

>he spends all his time at work working

I disapprove tremendously.

Uhh, yeah, get harsh, condemn me, you sexy little anonymous...

I'm out of this thread. I won't abide to this tomfoolery.

I guess the renaissance painters and all anatomy artists are massive perverts as well then.

>Actually it is pretty well understood the longer people abstain the more likely they are to have an unwanted pregnancy and/or get an STD
Why would that be, exactly? A 20-something has way more life experience and a more developed brain than someone in their teens, so you'd think they would be better equipped to not make stupid decisions that get them pregnant or STD'd.

of course. don't you remember Leonardo "the kid dicker" Davinci? or michelangelo "the nun fucker" Buonarroti? or Donatello "turtle dick" di Niccolò? all degenerates

I think it's stupid and straight up infantile. "I don't like it therefore NOBODY CAN EVER DO IT EVER!!!: >8C

it's bullshit because humans are animals. We don't censor nature documentaries now do we?

>censoring the human body
What so many lower life forms fail to comprehend is that the most sensual and erotic part of the human body is a woman's legs, and those are never censored in this day and age anymore. An enlightened scholar of true sexuality can look at exactly what he wants, anywhere he wants, in any piece of art he wants. Puritans and others who seek to curb human expression are so distracted by the false idols that are the female nipple, all genitals, and backsides on many occasions, that they allow true beauty to go unfettered. If you deplore censorship, become a legfag and slaughter your enemies' efforts.

you haven't watched discovery channel recently, haven't you? they censor explicit animal genitalia and copulation

>that rachnea
why am I laughing at this shit, damn me

Genitals are really kinda gross, so okay.

Nipples are whatever.

Nipples are basically just dicks

Not long enough.

Come to think of it, cleavage is sexy as fuck, so yeah. Censor them too.

More annoyed we can show all the little boy butts and peepees but god forbid female nudity

Equality my ass

It's stupid and silly, but it's also not something to really get upset about.

Not totally disagreeing with you there.

But it's armpits that are the womans best part, legs are secondary.

Casual nudity and violence don't register as strange anymore, but I feel like there was a time where it would bother me. I would imagine it still bothers a lot of people. It's kinda a maturity thing or at least being able to comprehend the context. Porn doesn't look like the painting that OP posted and people should recognize that you are supposed to admire the craft of it. The problem is that you can't expect teenagers to not react like a bunch of wild animals if they see a tit. I'm sure you could find tons of anecdotal evidence of people jacking off to some incredibly mild stuff on this board.

>teenagers to not react like a bunch of wild animals if they see a tit
>I'm sure you could find tons of anecdotal evidence of people jacking off to some incredibly mild stuff on this board

Teenagers will wank no matter what happens. Sup Forums users, too. And anybody else.

Also, why would that be a problem?

But I know what you mean with context. Same problem with satire: Not many people have assimilated enough media to know when they look at satire, because they cannot make the link to the context.

I respect your dedication to something unconventional, but reserve the right to withdraw that respect if I end up put off by it.

>I'm sure you could find tons of anecdotal evidence of people jacking off to some incredibly mild stuff on this board.
I jacked off to the moon once. Mostly just because I could. I fantasized about it being the luminescent rear end of a goddess mooning the entire earth.

You may.

It's not that I want to fuck an armpit, I just like kissing a woman there when I have sex. Probably because it's so personal, kissing a part where there can be body odor.

And now I will withdraw, because I feel I'm pushing the thread further into fetish territory.

Okay, you're good, I endorse this.

Man I can't do that anymore, I'm almost 30 and daily masturbation along with probable health issues and meds mean I struggle to even finish with all my porn helping out.

Catholics are fine, tho. Catholics are cool

I'm not that old, but I'm presently burnt out myself. Hopefully taking a break will restore my satisfaction.

>the one guy with an erection is not censored
kek

It's not necessarily a problem, but to some people it can be interpreted as one. Masturbation and the intake of pornography is seen by many people as our most shameful and hedonistic action. It's this tug of war between humans base instincts and our constructed morals. People who want to censor nudity are, in my opinion, ashamed of frivolous outputs of sexuality. If I indulge in these pleasures I am no longer a good person. People who are against censorship either don't find certain things inherently sexual or they do find it sexual, but don't think that that is a bad thing. It's a real shit show that is never going to be solved.

I don't see it.

>Hey, I know you guys don't like titties much, so I can redraw a bra for the american edition, free of charge.
>Don't bother, we'll just put a black bar over it
>And we won't publish it atfer issue 3
And that's why NBM is shit.

>The problem is that you can't expect teenagers to not react like a bunch of wild animals if they see a tit
That's because you censor it. Censored stuff has an appeal of its own.
Nobody gives a fuck about exposed titties in societies where they are out 24/7.
In most countries, nobody looks at exposed boobs on the beach during summer, it's so common it becomes mild.

To the left of Venus's shin/ankle area, the guy with the beard's crotch. I'm pretty sure that black rod there is his hardon.

Looks like a centaur, and a horse limb.

He does look like a centaur, but there really looks like there's a dick and balls there. Here he is from an image with different light, if it helps.

user you and I both know that's not true. No one looks at average girls on the beach period. But everyone is going to be looking at the 10/10 hot chick with the giant tits. Doesn't matter if everyone else is naked. Also everyone is going to try and forget seeing the 400 pound woman who has too many children and not enough teeth.

naked now and naked 99% of the time I'm on this site. I browse from my laptop while in bed..not that it would matter cause I never wear clothes around the house. What's the point? Clothes are uncomfortable and stupid

Good man.

Always blue jeans, socks, and a white t-shit, occasionally a sweater or drug rug if I get cold.

The only time I'm naked is when getting changed or in the shower

wish I could do that, sadly I live in a community full of prudes and too religious for their own good kind of persons, also everybody spies on everybody, I know because I usually spy on my neighbors and one day I crossed binoculars with the neighbor across the street who was spying on me.

It is like 52 degrees F in my house right now and I'm wearing a light jacket.

I bathe people for a living. Including genitals when the person is immobilized. Of course I enjoy beautiful people more than landwhale (if only because they have no old crumbs of bread between the rolls of fat) but I don't get aroused at all in that context anymore.

go back to Alaska, kodiak.

I'm pretty sure it's a conveniently placed rock

I'm interpreting it more like this. The guy tooting on the right seems to have centaur anatomy and I'm assuming the other guy's similar to him.

Actually... A lot of them did regular pornographic commission work for the nobility. That was their bread and butter when they weren't doing shit for the church.

It's dangling there, sticking out from his crotch and extending behind the shell. You can see the space between his thighs under it. I'm willing to admit I may be mistaken and it could be the shadows of his horse leg muscles, but it's not a rock.

Literally only americucks do this.

I wasted two minutes of valuable film class lecture to be beat be someone more talented than me. C'est la vie

This is what i did

this

Get off the internet and pay attention to your schooling.

>also everybody spies on everybody, I know because I usually spy on my neighbors and one day I crossed binoculars with the neighbor across the street who was spying on me.
user what kind of Spy vs. Spy community are you living in?