Asexuals don't exist

Asexuals don't exist.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypoactive_sexual_desire_disorder
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Uhg don't tell me that this show keeps going

Feminism ruined this show. Fucking. Ruined.

no, but virgins do, and it's easier to pretend to be a special snowflake than confront the reality of your own failings

it's not even funny it's just animal puns and existential drama. depressing as fuck

>Asexuals don't exist
Not to the extent that snow flake fags like to claim.

yupp each episode makes sure to spend at least 5 minutes extolling feminist/liberal values. It's getting exhausting and I'm not even done the season. It's not like the show was completely apolitical before but this season seems to really be cranking it up a notch.

Tried to watch this show last night. Is it actually supposed to not be funny? Just curious if it isn't my style of humor or there actually was no attempt at it by the creators.

Doesn't being "asexual" just mean there's something biologically wrong with you in that you have no sex drive?

Cranked it up a notch is an understatement. Like you said, it was always there. Diane had always been very left leaning. But now it's like. Everyone. I'm waiting for Judah to say he's asexual and rub dicks with Todd.

Eh it's not too bad. Does feel like it's pushing an agenda at times though.

Originally asexual meant that the organism can fertilize its own eggs -see 1998 Godzilla. But these snowflakes today took that term and repurposed it for themselves.

That's what leftists do. Change the definitions of words to distort reality.

jesus christ if you parrots were any stupider you'd forget how to breath

I think asexuality can manifest from depression

It's a great show

I met a girl and tried taking her on dates and kissing her but she was not cool with it and she told me she was a virgin.

She was all fucked up though. She was probably abused or something. Too bad because she had GREAT fucking cans and hips, a nice body. Exactly the kind of body that would get abused actually...

you two are the only ones twisting words to distory reality. If you retards had any understanding of latin etymology youd realise 'asexual' literally means 'not sexual'

forgot pic

pls tell me ur being ironic

yes. it isn't a sexuality and it IS a mental disorder

Well it depends on the liberal definition of "asexual". Is someone who has testicular cancer or a low sex drive asexual? Isn't that more of a physical and hormonal problem than a mental one?

I actually know a chick who's asexual or a close to being it as you can. She's also a textbook manchild/sjw.

>has a master degree in social science
>realizes there's no real jobs in her field so she works a pointless office job for a government department.
>been diagnosed with a variety of mental illnesses including depression and anxiety
>kiss less virgin who's never had a bf
>life consists entirely of reposting pokemon/huffpost/ocuppy memes on FB and going to the gym

This shitty show didn't have an asexual episode did it?

a person with zero physical abnormalities and no sex drive has a brain problem. being dickless doesn't make you asexual, it makes you dickless

Most people I've met who self identify as asexuals are annoying pieces of shit. And their "online communities" are MBTI forum tier.

That said, don't know why it's such a firm conviction for so many people that people who have no sexual attraction to others don't or cannot exist. Human sexuality has proven itself to be fucked up in so many ways of it's expression like todlercons and giantess fags and vote fetishists and whatever - that it doesn't require much imagination to say that some people are fucked by the inverse - a relative or complete lack of sexual drive or attraction. Is there something scary about the idea? Or is it just a convenient target now that it's hard to shit on gays and trannies publicly. I imagine it's like the redditors choice of sexual scapegoat. You can probably get upvotes for doing an epic put down of asexuals ("Unless you can reproduce through meiosis madam, I must say you are debunked!!") on some number of mainstream subreddits.

how so? Its certainly not harmful to the practicer or anyone else. level i dont think it can be seen as an illness. Why do you expect that everyone participates in sexual activity? why does it upset you if someone choose not to?

I knew a girl like that when I was in my teens. She got diagnosed with sexual aversion disorder, received therapy, and is now engaged to someone I presume she's had sex with. I don't know much about asexuality but I hope they pursue all avenues before giving up on bumping uglies entirely.

Someone who lacks any desire to have sex suffers from some sort of mental/hormonal problem.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypoactive_sexual_desire_disorder

Asexuals just don't want to admit there's something wrong with them.

>For this to be regarded as a disorder, it must cause marked distress or interpersonal difficulties and not be better accounted for by another mental disorder, a drug (legal or illegal), some other medical condition, or asexuality.
Hmm

>I'm asexual but I like masturbating to porn

You're not asexual, you're just a coward. The literal childhood sweeatheart of his tried to jump his balls and he was such a bitch that he didn't engage. He's representative of an imaginary world that idiots want to create.

Don't want to have kids? Fine, but asexuality is actually a biological term that defines a being that can reproduce by itself. Fuck, right off with your pronouns, stupid verbs, and lack of sense.

Vote fetishists?

If they have a low sex drive then no not asexual.
If they had no sex drive then theyd be asexual regardless of circumstances.
Most asexuals wouldnt run around screaming about their lack of preference. just sounds like some crazy bitch.
why do you call asexuality a problem?

>removing nature from man
>shiggy

You realize if you choose not to participate in procreation you a complete genetic dead end and the truest definition of a failure, right? It's a disorder because whatever lead to it, be it genetics or environment, is inherently bad for the existence of our species, or really any species that might have this disorder for that matter.

Now thats not to say go be an edeglord and treat asexuals poorly, but it's by definition abnormal, and a negative treat to have.

>or asexuality.

Asexuals don't even believe HSDD exists.

>why do you call asexuality a problem

The same reason a girl not getting her period after going through puberty would be considered a problem. The desire to have sex is basic biological function of the human body.

>Asexuals don't exist.
They do. I was married to one. AMA

Well, I'd ask you why you married them in the first place but I don't like the answers of a complete moron.

Is it weird if I don't really have a sex drive, but I find men attractive? I am gay for sure, but at most I'd suck a dick every once in a while? I really jsut want to kiss and snuggle

I'm good friends an asexual chick.
Literally doesn't masturbate, has absolutely zero sex drive, has no interest in romance or anything like that.
I don't get how people can't think they don't exist, in fact, I would suspect Asexuals are near almost as common as gay people. It's literally just a person who doesn't experience sexual attraction and doesn't have a sex drive.

I briefly dated an asxual girl, fantastic body but she had no desire to do anything sexual. Not even hug or hold hands(which is what really killed it for me). Either way she had a fucked up childhood so I have to wonder if it was a case of nature or nurture.

I loved her, and I was a naïve kid.

That's barely an excuse. Marriage is an insanely stupid contract that you should only enter if kids are involved. That's a biological contract that you cannot get away from. You don't love a person unless you've made life with them.

>the sole purpose and reason for life is purely biological reproduction

Come on brainlets, this might be true if youre a single celled organism living in some scum pond in africa somewhere. As a human being there are plenty of things a person can do to better their fellow man and leave a legacy than just fucking some random bimbo and having a few welfare draining kids.

There's plenty of those and they're mostly single cell organisms. Perhaps some invertebrates.

The argument isn't that they don't exist. The question is whether its like hetro or homosexuality or simple a bi-product of some underling problem.

>That's barely an excuse.
That's literally the reason why half of the people get married and why half of marriages end in divorce.

>better their fellow man
All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.

how can you guys not believe asexuality exists when this is Sup Forums of all places. at least 90% are functionally asexual and if you go to places like r9k or whatever im pretty sure like 100 percent are actual asexuals

So will every single genetic line on the planet at some point or another.

Desire to pass on your DNA is a trait found in all life.

Then people should be more careful.

Religious institutions hassle the hell out of people over it. From priests to rabbis. My parents couldn't get married until they consulted with a rabbi which to me, makes no fucking sense. Yet they've been together for decades and there's no stopping it. Rabbis usually make sure that you're not marrying two passive-aggressive assholes that won't be honest with each other.

Or else why even try?

>I'm 15 and I have all the answers

Still doesn't mean than an asexual cant have a kid. They still produce sperm/eggs do they not?

Spooked as fuck. Nothing wrong with a bit of biological teleology but you can't make an "argument" like that. Reproducing organisms exist plentifully because they reproduce. A mechanical cause and effect. Not a programmed, ethically imbued list of rules - unless you're a theist, which is fine, but I assume that you are not. Oftentimes biological "virtues" coincide with the things conscious humans value, for obvious reasons, but certainly not always.

Another thing. Humans are social creatures and not all the children a reproductive unit pumps out are necessarily "meant" to go and reproduce themselves. Remember that we are not just a species where the male goes and fucks everything he can while leaving his mates and children behind. We raise families and cooperate. Aunts and uncles. Priests, shamans. Soldiers. Just like not every organism in a bee hive is meant for reproduction, but they are still a necessary and incredibly helpful to the reproductive success of the whole hive. Whether or not asexuals could fit into a category like that, I don't know, but the point is that human success and failure is not solely on the individual's reproductive ability and success.

Nothing wrong with that user. Come visit /cm/

If that had been the case they still would have happily married us.
What I was naïve about was that I did not at all realize how important sexual compatibility was to a marriage. People make mistakes, especially the young. It may happen to you someday.

They can but a lack of desire to engage in sex is a major prohibitive to that.

>MUH SPOOKS

Fuck off /leftypol/

In certain parts of the country, its because of religion that people get married so young. See purity rings and purity balls. They deprive young people from having sex(despite they all fucking secretly without protection) and then they get married because its what they are supposed to do according to baby jesus.

good post

I'm not a pedophile though

Rabbis aren't like priests, and you can't lie to them. Or else you're just lying to yourself. You have to admit everything to the other person. Or else it's not a good rabbi. Don't start anything that you don't intend to finish.

>You realize if you choose not to participate in procreation you a complete genetic dead end and the truest definition of a failure, right?

You're a genetic dead end if you don't have children, user.

I mean you can tell yourself that you're not because maybe one of your drunken one night stands decided to have a kid, but if you don't live in the Third World that's extremely unlikely

I'm probably more right-wing than you user. I noticed that Sup Forums jacks off over Ernst Junger even though they've never read him (neither have I). Maybe if they did they'd realise they don't have to superstitiously avoid "leftist" ideas and writers as if they can be infected by them or something.

YES! EMBRACE NIHILISM! That was my point after all. That and that people bitching about Todd are the same as those that celebrate/defend him.

They have no desire to engage in sex is not to say they have no desire to reproduce. The could merely see the sex as a means to an end.

>The could merely see the sex as a means to an end.
This is true. My ex wife wanted children but she truly hated sex.

>Maybe if they did they'd realise they don't have to superstitiously avoid "leftist" ideas and writers as if they can be infected by them or something

/leftypol/ has the exact same problem, except they also act pretentious as if they're intelligent because they've read an incestuously-limited selection of Marxists critiquing and building on the works of earlier Marxists

Desire/enjoying having sex is a massive biological incentive to reproduce. Not wanting/deriving pleasure from getting it on reduces your chances of successfully having kids.

asexuals = permavirgins

"asexuals" are just autists that dont know how to get laid.

I agree.
Stirner is a fun meme, although like all of them Facebook normies and redditors have sucked the sap of fun dry from it

I agree with that but all this proves is asexuals have a lower chance of reproducing.

But I don't think an individuals sole worth is based on their reproductive capacity.

>see all these apes try to defend sexual preferences
>beyond being entrapped by human biology
>focus on personal goals, power, and success over rubbing genitals with other filthy primates

el oh el

Why do you care? You don't watch it

>I am le penisless spock meme
L O L

There are probably some. But for every real one there is probably 100+ virgin bs artists deluding themselves.

>But I don't think an individuals sole worth is based on their reproductive capacity.

I agree Issac Newton was an asexual and that doesn't diminish from his accomplishments. I'm just saying that you would't pretend someone who was blind had nothing wrong with them.

>Originally asexual meant that the organism can fertilize its own eggs
Thats just you being dumb.
A thing that reproduces without performing sex is asexual. But it doesn't mean asexual is a thing that can reproduce without performing sex.

>Issac Newton was an asexual
Homosexual, more likely

young butterscotch was hot

Possible, he was a hardcore christian and hated woman.