What the fuck kind of ending shot is this?

What the fuck kind of ending shot is this?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=houP7mAjZ0o
twitter.com/AnonBabble

I don't remember this, was this after the credits?

Stop posing spoilers
HOLY FUCK MY LIFE

I'm buying up shares in this fresh meme

A daring synthesis

dullest franchise

MOM'S

>being on Sup Forums after one of 2017 most anticipated movies releases
>complaining about spoilers

why are you here if you don't want spoilers you fucking autist

Hey it's online already, just go watch it. It's in Russian but you can read the closed captioning.

Holy shit. We really were trained to read Stephen King

...

ppl on here have no manners NO FUCKING MANNERS

...

No!

Jesus fucking Christ I was about to post the pasta

>the part where Pennywise witnesses Dumblydore die

youtube.com/watch?v=houP7mAjZ0o

imagine how pathetic you have to be to shill for views of your shitty youtube channel by shilling on a fucking Sup Forums board

it's ok user, i just got back from the showing. OP just being a faggot on the weekend. Go see it (:

somebody is going to have to redo the No! pasta

What could OP think Stephen King would possibly hope to accomplish by copying the ending scene of one of the dullest franchises in history? Seriously the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.