this was quite a funny movie.
This was quite a funny movie
Hunter Clark
Other urls found in this thread:
guru.bafta.org
twitter.com
David Mitchell
This movie was really quite good, but i honestly liked the second one better. It had a lot more bright colors and cartoonish movements that I feel is lacking from 3d films from other studios. Everyone had distinct silhouettes, and they really played around with the lighting to make that happen. I use it as an example of 3d done right, as it still kept that cartoonishness from 2d animation but used 3d for ease of production and to add polish.
Bentley Cruz
i only remember parody of Steve Jobs.
Caleb Rivera
>the sequel wasn't called Pickles to Pittsburgh
It's like they don't deserve to live
Christian Torres
hot fudge
David Price
Give it some credit, there was an orangutan too
Mason Gomez
Was ok but the romance felt forced and cringy.
Michael Hill
>How to Train Your Dragon sequel isn't called How to Be a Pirate
Joseph Butler
It was ok, bit I hated the way characters would spaz out because SO WACKY.
The stupid floppy noodle dance the CEO guy in the sequel bugs me for a similar reason
Chase Flores
Had some great faces.
Jackson Thomas
...
Dominic Myers
...
Benjamin Peterson
...
Levi Thomas
...
Charles Parker
...
Connor Green
...
Sebastian Cox
...
Logan Watson
...
Eli Collins
...
Owen Clark
...
Easton Perry
...
Dylan Anderson
...
Nathaniel Rivera
...
Levi Barnes
...
John Barnes
Will a Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs thread provide fun discussion on a brillaint Sony Animated film? Or will a internet reviewer in a fedora call it the worst animated film of all time? LETTTT'S FIIIIND OUUUUT!
Brandon Cruz
Sam is cute and perfect
Carson Price
It's a Phil Lord/Chris Miller movie, of course it's good.
Fuck, now I wanna rewatch it.
Jordan Walker
This is a good listen if you're a fan, they reveal a lot about the problems that occurred while making this movie
guru.bafta.org
David Green
>Sam is cute and perfect
Good taste
Charles James
Damn, this looks sweet, thanks user.
Aiden Foster
This one has potential.
Juan Cox
This was when I stopped watching him.
Dominic Phillips
>guys that did clone high
Instantly trusted it to be decent
Parker Martin
This is one of the worst opinions I have ever heard. The second was a flimsy, soulless imitation of the first in every way, but you like it because of distinct character silhouettes?
Is this a meme I'm not aware of?
Lincoln Sullivan
the second one is ok, but
>ugly rapist orangutan
>food are people too
makes me want to puke
Henry Bell
>bright colors and cartoonish movements
>Everyone had distinct silhouettes
>still kept that cartoonishness from 2d animation
Literally all your points are already the first movie, what are you talking about.
Matthew Nguyen
Yeah, the first one's style and quirks are the result of geniune personality from the creators. The second one is an emulation
It's not terrible but it lacked wit and the same ingenuity