What are Sup Forums's thoughts on the Queen?

What are Sup Forums's thoughts on the Queen?

dried up old hag that's only good for photo ops.

ironic because nobody actually wants to look at her.

she'll probably abdicate quite soon, Charles will also abdicate, and William will take up King

The family is mostly a cultural thing and is really only relevant for its ceremonies and awards, because people tune in and pay attention to it. William will be the next king because he's photogenic and has a strong family with Kate: the image of the two of them and their kid all together makes for good television and high resolution pictures posted online.

corrupt evil cunt shipping arms for oil via BAE systems

The poor and the needy
are selfish and greedy on her terms

god save the queen

>she'll probably abdicate quite soon, Charles will also abdicate, and William will take up King
Not how it works, Ping.

she is perfect.
America should follow by example and recognize the Queen for what she is.

inbred old slag. her and her inbred family are globalist piece of shit

yes that's precisely how it will work. you don't sit on the throne till the day you die unless you choose to.

i think the british aristocracy should take back what is theirs and kick out the parliament and muzzies
american there is no aristocracy as law will not allow it and culturally it has been dead since the south lost the war

And considering she's going for the record, that likely won't happen. Iirc, she already has it.

More like they do sit there unless they choose to drop their vows and pass it on. Her Majesty has previously said that she would never abdicate, anyway. And there's no reason based Charles would do so either.
Monarchy isn't about populist shite like democracy.

actually it's completely the opposite
she is not globalist in any way
she's explicitly for states by nature of being a monarch
be thankful for that you maple moron

>A fucking leaf

The queen is a model of decorum and decency. The whole world would benefit by emulating her.

>based Charles

k moite, k

canadians love the queen,

if you dont love liz your a piece of human trash

/thread

Maybe you should read up on him, Danebro. He'll make a good king, hopefully able to take (((parliament))) down a peg.

Based Queen of Australia and Shitposting.

Btw, her title is, "Her Majesty" not, "the Queen" you degenarate plebiscite.

We need a president not a prime minister. The queen should not be our head if state. She does nothing for us.

Bad

Fuck off out of the Commonwealth then you ungrateful filthy commie fuck-knuckle.

enough reading for me to call him based or worthy of the crown.

Seems legit.

>We need a president not a prime minister. The queen should not be our head if state.
What makes (((you))) say tha?

Didn't do her job. Watched her nations go down the toilet because:
>muh lack of real power
>gotta preserve the monarchy even if it serves absolutely no purpose

She has always had the media's ear and could have warned her people about voting for traitors at any time.
>b...but then they would have got rid of her.

I doubt it and would argue that failing to speak up only delays the inevitable for two reasons. One is we will see them as increasingly ridiculous if they don't seem to do anything for our nations. Two is check out jubilee footage in London: a city riddled with non-whites and damn near none of them in that footage.
The monarchy won't be preserved in a mongrelized society. They have no reason to value it.

At any rate he is married to a divorcee.

If a nation insists on having a monarch, they should be held to higher values than the plebs, even if its just for show.

A show about traditions.

It makes no sense at all to put him on the throne.

Just fucking die ALREADY!!!!

a corrupt flunky of the Jews.

All i know about her is that there will be great amount of funposting and bants when she dies.

Hereditary rule is Jewish and encourages pan-European race-mixing so I despise her and all other monarchs with a passion.

You Brits and Common wealth fags know this bitch does give a flying fuck about you while considering Brits her inferiors and peasants right

King of Thailand is pretty based though

>She has always had the media's ear and could have warned her people about voting for traitors at any time.
Not without getting Cromwell'd. Better to hold fast until things can be remedied.

>If a nation insists on having a monarch, they should be held to higher values than the plebs, even if its just for show.
Agreed.
>It makes no sense at all to put him on the throne.
Why? To not have the rightful heir (and a damn good one) take power would be even worse. It'd debase the monarchy to the level of the tv contest of (((democracy))).

>Hereditary rule is Jewish
Wut.
>and encourages pan-European race-mixing
Well no.
>I despise her and all other monarchs with a passion.
Good goy. Remember that when you have the luxury of voting for one of two (((presidential candidates))) in November!

if harry doesn't become king I say we declare a republic

Harry is probably going to be the Antichrist

>Not without getting Cromwell'd. Better to hold fast until things can be remedied.

She basically pre-dates non-whites being let in and commies taking over our institutions. Hold fast for what? She lived through the best possible time to speak up.
She is going to croak without doing her job.

Her being "Crommwell'd" would have been a good thing. Her warning would have been seen as prophecy once the kikes got their way. Like Ron Paul memes x1000.

lmao

you underestimate the queen pierre

she is your head of state

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN!

>she is your head of state
My head of state isn't an old hag, he's a black man.

harry was 2nd born...unless william kate and their son died harry will never be king

sorry it was meant for this cuck

alternatively they could abdicate

He's already been marked to become Arch-Duke of Australia and liberate us from politicians.

>She lived through the best possible time to speak up.
Hindsight is 20/20. But look at the shit Charles caught for doing even basic moves towards proper ruling. There was "outrage" in the media when Her Majesty was reported as commenting on Brexit and Scotxit.

Charlotte too, now. The laws were changed.

William might refuse to be King because it's too patriarchal, or something.

Literally, figuratively, ecumenically, and grammatically no.

>And when the thousand years are expired, Satan shall be loosed out of his prison,

>And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Gog and Magog, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.

>And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and compassed the camp of the saints about, and the beloved city
>Rev 20:7-9

Anti-christ position is taken user

Pretty sure she was pro-brexit.

If she had full control the UK wouldn't have so many shitskins and degeneracy.
T. Welshman

remember this burger

when the crown dies...so does a piece of your history also

celebrating your independance wont be the same every year...it will be frowned upon as petty eventually.

and its downhill from there.

The Welsh aren't citizens.

>Hindsight is 20/20.

Do you really want to let her off the hook for the enrichment that began in the mid to late 90s or even just the specific jihadi enrichment? The results were absolutely predictable.

>outrage

So what? The thing about Crommwell is there was also a Restoration. It's not as if the Queen's head was ever on the block. At worst she would have been retired to a palace, become a casual right-wing media talking head and be telling everyone "told you so."

What do you think a Monarchy is good for if they won't even stand up to a handful of Jewish media moguls?

Milo Yiannopoulos is a more regal figure by these standards.

>/threading your own post

>The Welsh aren't citizens.

What a shitty looking passport your Brits have.

Honestly have no idea why the general population loves the Queen and rejects any criticism towards her. Literal cucks.

the uk is like a mini usa

scotland northern ireland wales and england are all states

but instead of states we call them kingdoms as they all used to have a king each that used to war with each other

eventually they was all united under 1 king

just as all of your states are united under 1 president.

wales are a kingdom within the united kingdom.

a kingdom = kings dominion

>Do you really want to let her off the hook for the enrichment that began in the mid to late 90s or even just the specific jihadi enrichment?
Because what could Her Majesty possibly do? I'm assuming you went to an Aussie public school, so you should understand Westminster, as well as Magna Carta, Cromwell, the Glorious Revolution, and the Parliamentary bargain by George III.
>The thing about Crommwell is there was also a Restoration.
True, and I'm all for Ordo Ab Chao, but it's a risky bloody thing. Cromwell didn't have international media and banks supporting him.
>What do you think a Monarchy is good for if they won't even stand up to a handful of Jewish media moguls?
Better than being without them.
>Milo Yiannopoulos is a more regal figure by these standards.
Regal? No. But of course it's easy to be like him when there's nothing to lose.

Damn that's a sexy passport. I hate our Australian ones. They're fugly, and only slightly better than USA, except USA has hilarious pages in it.

Turns a blind eye to the pedos in her family.

ours is better

what

She's pretty based desu
>selects all images with columns

>Because what could Her Majesty possibly do?

You people have such an incredibly low opinion of the capabilities of the Queen, I don't know how you consider yourselves supporters.

At any time during her reign she could have had the press broadcast anything she had to say.
She could have told her people "This is what these people want to do, do not let them do it. Do not put people like this into power."

You simply can't deny she had that soap box.

>Better than being without them.

In what way? Seriously, in what way are we better off if they do absolutely nothing?

Do you think one of Will's kids is the God Emperor, or something? That he will kick off the Great Crusade of removing kebab?
We never had to have the kebab in the first place and if we remove it: it won't be with the help of the Royals.

The royals are controlled by the Jewry and should be beheaded for treason. If you support them you are a cuck and aren't truly red pilled.

>supports jewry
>pro brexit
>anti globalist

She represents me a lot more than disgusting career politicians or ultra corrupt corporations or oligarchs.

>You people have such an incredibly low opinion of the capabilities of the Queen
No, it's a low opinion of the fencesitters in the UK.
That soapbox is owned and run by people who would do without Her, remember.
>Seriously, in what way are we better off if they do absolutely nothing?
Because the vacuum would be filled by more (((Hollywood))) types?
>Do you think one of Will's kids is the God Emperor, or something? That he will kick off the Great Crusade of removing kebab?
No, and they don't need to be. Any monarchy is better than no monarchy. It's at least a symbol of hope to be bolstered, and the removal of which might be enough of a kick to turn things around.

Nice try, Corbyn.

she should make Britain great again

>the Sun
Do you call yourself red pilled? She like Boris thought it would never happen.
>anti globalist
Retard.

u jelly you dumb fat fuck

>That soapbox is owned and run by people who would do without Her, remember.

That only gives them incentive to broadcast her in full. If they tried to edit her speech it could very well destroy networks.

>Any monarchy is better than no monarchy.

I disagree. If she went down in righteous flames that would be better for us than them doing nothing.
Normies don't give a shit about them because they don't serve a purpose. They only like the Queen about half as much as they like Ellen and for similar reasons.

A shoah'd royal family that tried to warn us would be much, much better symbol.

She knighted Mugabe and let Rhodesia die

I hope migrants run a train on her wrinkly ass

Replace the monarch and PM with a dictator.

>That only gives them incentive to broadcast her in full. If they tried to edit her speech it could very well destroy networks.
Big maybe. Media is everything now, after all. They only need to cow the supporters and keep the fencesitters ambivalent (or bring them about), after all.
>A shoah'd royal family that tried to warn us would be much, much better symbol.
"The evil Elizabeth II tried to genocide her own people with those evil white nationalists, so we unanimously got rid of them, and everyone is much happier in our multicultural paradise now with our first trans President, Akhmal Muhammed."

It's not like Her Majesty has a lot of say in it. All knighthoods and peerages are decided by Parliament now.

>Muh queen has no power
Do really believe this?

She could've spoken out against it. She could've spoke up, given some support to the Rhodesians.

Hell, that one picture in this post

Says that S. Africa is a Commonwealth nation. If them, why not Rhodesia?

She betrayed them, and the shining jewel of Africa died as a result.

I will never forgive her unless she expresses regret for her betrayal of Rhodesia

No, i didn't say that. I was implying that it'd be dangerous for her to use it. Or do you mean the knighthoods thing? Because that's just how it works.

Going against Parliament is going against their deal. How are you not getting this?
>She betrayed them
Yea? What did Her Majesty actually do? Especially given that it was Parliament giving the explicit orders to see the Boers rogered.

boris broke rank and risked everything and won

the queen has a vested interest to not be sucked deeper into the EU...nothing she has said has indicated what you claim

the era of colonization was over

if we carried on it would of made us look bad on a global stage.

>boris broke rank and risked everything and won
You mong. As soon as he got the result he back tracked and looked like he was going to cry. It was a play for power because he thought it would go the same way as Scotland and gain him power in the long run.

At that point we will celebrate it as the beginning of the end of England.

>European Union
Better update that shit.

he shilled for brexit..your opinion is not fact

keep dreaming burger...we fell from grace and now gathered ourselves for the long climb back to re attain our former glory

you are 21 trillion in debt and if hillary wins it will get worse...the ground has begun to crumble under your feet

we will take back all the power you took from us after ww2

the empire will rise again! the sun has not set!

...

>literary wrote articles months before the vote shilling for the EU
>waited til he thought he knew it was going to lose to back it
>people spoke openly on both sides about not trusting him
>Boris btfo by Gove
You are a cuck just like Boris with his shilling for Israel.