Harry Potter is better than Star Wars. This is a fact

Harry Potter is better than Star Wars. This is a fact.

Not really though.

2017 literally numale vs SJW

A New Hope is boring
Return of the Jedi is childish as fuck
The prequels are just meh
The Force Awakens is fanservice and bad
Rogue One is bipolar in tone

Harry Potter is much more consistent a fulfilling as a series.

Inb4 pasta

>Harry Potter is much more consistent a fulfilling as a series.

Agreed. While SW had better and worse moments, HP franchise constantly delivered bucket of liquid shit

Now fuck off with your bait thread, sage

Just typing "sage" at the end of a post doesn't sage it.

The Order of the Phoenix is way cooler than the Jedi Order

It's not hard to be cooler than ugly virgins.

Daily "Im so edgy and I hate star wars" thread

As much as I'd like to attempt to, I can't prove you wrong with regard to one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

you're not wrong

...

But how are Rowling's gangbang scenes?

>liking harry potter is edgy

>"No!"

who are you quoting

only in 2 things harry potter franchise is better

Those darn hufflepuffs, man.

Rowling's tits?

They're both pretty terrible.

But at least Star Wars handled the Nazi allegory with a little subtlety, was able to tell its story succinctly, and the special effects aren't horribly dated. And Luke actually has agency in the story.

You.

What happened to the color? Did Zack Snyder work on this film?

Both are great. Only plebs say otherwise