It's a 'Sup Forums gets BTFO' episode

>It's a 'Sup Forums gets BTFO' episode
Damn, now I can't say 'Deus Vult!' with pride anymore.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Compendious_Book_on_Calculation_by_Completion_and_Balancing
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volga_trade_route
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_raid_against_Rome
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Ostia
youtu.be/cQaLjnkBnKo
youtu.be/GeGgZPFOfT0
youtu.be/kDP6OHIZqrQ
youtu.be/N6NHGaIrfFc
youtu.be/TS9pz6Dtef8
youtu.be/qq1EFqd7iwA
youtu.be/4m11g0437lQ
youtu.be/DMqwHbocIA8
youtu.be/n-zXHT97xXM
youtu.be/zUULSDXydrQ
youtu.be/482T6U_G8Yo
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>implying it wasn't all for plunder

Who could possibly be crafty enough to gain from this prosperity and wealth

shiiieeet.
I don't know that to believe now.

The first post was in reference to the first crusade, the second somehow thinks the first is refuted by events that took place centuries after mostly in Germany.

#NotAllCrusaders

and we are done here

If either side bothered to read into it they'd learn atrocities were commited by both sides

there has never been a war that was good guy vs bad guy

Both religions sucked and destroyed Europe

Trips cumfirm
Fuck off OP you faggot

All American wars

I'll debunk it then

>be raided, enslaved, raped, murdered and conquered for 500 years

The HRE, France and Normandy almost never were in direct combat against islamic kingdoms prior to the crusades. Vikings were the real problem.

>destitute poverty
lmao no
normandy was one of the richest in europe, its king was literally midway through besieging a city when he heard the news
>constant sea raids
trade between countries not directly bordering each other was far smaller then
almost every country was self sufficient

shall i go on?

fucking retard

Thats wrong though. The muslims attacked Europe several hundred years before the first crusade. You're a fucking retard and should be ashamed of yourself.

>no example
k

>The muslims attacked Europe several hundred years before the first crusade.

Hey, let's stick to Christcuckery so that maybe in a few hundred years (if we're not completely wiped out by then) we'll fight back!

Read a history book you scraggly tooth bastard.

>jEB

Low energy argument.

lol shill.

Trying to stifle white man self-determination.

- Roman Empire collapses
- White man attacked from all sides by foreigners
- white man stable under Christianity
- white man stays white man under Christianity
- white man kicks out Muslims and North Africans from Iberia
- white man under Christianity takes over much of the world
- profit

Non-whites and non-Christians try to white guilt the white man and con the white man into blaming Christianity for shit.

White man lands and white man aboriginal ethnic groups being crushed by globalist.

"that's right white man, you were fucked as Christians... keep thinking that... while you country is given away to Black Africans and Muslims. "

this picture has been debunke several times

Look at France. It was white and French during Christianity.

It went secular globalist and now it's Algerian and sub-saharan African.

look at Britian.

Campaign to make ethnic Ghanian into the personification of an ethnic Anglo, Brit.

No respect for the aboriginals of Europe. No respect for the natives.

>go hunting for grail
>bring back a more controlling religion and banking

K

>while you country is given away to Black Africans and Muslims.

By whom though? In my 400 people town it'd be the Catholic church that's giving away my country to 60 refugees at the moment.
In Germany it's pastor's daughter Angela Merkel, head of the Christian Democratic Union, inviting them in.
On EU level it's the European Christian Political Movement mainly shilling for immigrants and human rights and help for shitskin countries etc.

The lines are pretty clear as far as I'm concerned.

>Can't Google it

C u c k

TOURS
O
U
R
S

if it was so large it was enough for a huge war i'm sure you'll have no trouble telling me

It's what the gypsy said Ahmed. The battle of Tours where the Franks and Aquitinains led by Charles Martel threw the Ummayads out of north France in a battle the which would be the biggest Muslim attempt into Europe until the battle of Vienna. The Ummayds tried again in a lesser known attempt at Narbonne (I think) and again Charles Martel shattered thier army

>check flag
Post disregarded.

anti-Christian infiltrators.

White man achieved peak power under "Christian identity."

It's been in decline ever since adopting "Secular Diversity."

Catholic Church isn't even muscling in refugees, it's the secular elite. They've basically strong armed Catholics into "being cool and modern" and basically aiming a gun at their own heads.

>Muh everyone was barbarians until specific ideology that I just happen to subscribe to showed up.

Abrahamists were really the CURRENT YEAR cucks of their times.

An invasion attempt in 732 ad justifies a war 400 years later?

The iberian caliphates were the extent into europe they reached, the crusades were quite literally orchestrated by Urban II to extend his power and convert nationalism into religious fervor, only it turned out hiring a bunch of conscripts and mercenaries was a bad idea, and the balkans and Constantinople became war torn areas of rape and pillaging on both sides, with many historians agreeing that this instability sped up the decline of Byzantium.

It was Algebra, not math.

Some Persian Muslim dude wrote a math book and Algebra became a thing.

They created the word Algebra but people had been practicing it since Babylon.

>An invasion attempt in 732 ad justifies a war 400 years later?
You didn't talk about justifications of the Crusades, you said that the Muslims never touched France, because you apparently don't know history.

>nationalism
>11th century
You what, Ahmed?

Galois invented algebra ;-)

War of Iberia took 700 years. It was Mordor vs Gondor. An MMO pvp battleground.

Never-ending war between Muslim and Christian.

Crusades were defensive wars.

Muslims bitch about not being considered members of the "white man."

Those who say recognize the Crusades as defensive recognize the Muslim Arab as an Imperialist white man with white man ambition.

The Arab Muslims were hellbent on world domination like proper white man but they towed behind them Western North Africans and blacks and then lost control of Islam in colossal fuck ups.

I said almost never were in direct combat. Which is correct. Tours is an example from 400 years prior.

Yes. Nationalism was a thing in the 11th century. Particularly in major cities like Rome and Vienna.

>Invasion attempt in 732
>Justifying the war 400 years later.

>tfw someone eagerly forgets all the other attacks on Christianity and on Europe between 732 and 1095
>tfw someone forgets that 1095 meant nothing by the 13th Century
>tfw this faggot doesn't know about the Sieges of Vienna

You realise that we only finally removed the cancer of Islam from Europe at the start of the 20th Century right? Only to fucking invite it back barely seventy years later.

The massacring of saxons is exaraggated

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Compendious_Book_on_Calculation_by_Completion_and_Balancing

Muhammad ibn Musa al-Khwarizmi

Algebra is named after his book or a word in title of his book. "al-jabr"

>Catholic poles

these shitty polish slavs allied lots of times with infidels to fight against teutonic order

Diophantus of Alexandria. The father of algebra.

Muslims just copied everything from the Greeks.

they were not franks u fucking cuck, just like russians aren't rus, gypsies aren't dacians, americans aren't indians, swedish people aren't swedes, english aren't anglo saxon.

There's a lot of things you can't say with pride.

>Viking slave traders regularly sold their slaves to Muslims
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volga_trade_route

>Muslims attack Sicily, Byzantines defend their island
>Lombard princes go full retard and use Muslim mercenaries to fight each other
>So many Muslim pirates and mercenaries in southern Italy that they raid the Vatican in 846
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_raid_against_Rome
>Pope bands the Christians together, they repel the next attack
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Ostia

>Muslims switch to hit and run raids, carrying people into slavery
>Coastline becomes depopulated
>Lombard princes decide it's too costly to fight it, easier to pay tribute
>Norman knights arrive in 999 returning from pilgrimage to Jerusalem
>See how cucked the Lombard princes are (Lombards were originally Swedes)
>Fight off the Muslims for them
>Become full time mercenaries in southern Italy
>Take back Sicily from Muslims, overthrow Lombard princes, sack Rome

Jesus wan't a Jew even though he was born in Judea to Jewish parents because he knocked over some money changing tables and made it harder for people who were visiting Jerusalem to exchange currencies. HAH

take that fagans.

bitch why can't we be proud of selling mongols back to the muslims as slaves?

yeah but the Muslim guy wrote a book which assembled a lot of math stuff.

The book became successful and he's one of the guys who's credited with making algebra it's own discipline within "math."

"This ain't arithmetic. This is something else. Let's call it 'algebra' to make sure what sort of stuff we're talking about."

Greeks were doing algebra 1000 years before islam. They just took some Greek texts, crossed out the name, and wrote in their own. Go look at the names of most of the theorums.

It's not mentioning the years of slaver raids and such

LARPagans on suicide watch.

He also added some stuff.

It's kind of like Calculus. There was stuff like calculus before Newton and Leibniz but they both wrote books about it and get credit for it.

Math has fuzzy history.

>WE

Yeah, I don't give a shit. Christianity as it is right now is the enemy.

Ever notice how whenever the JIDF want Sup Forums to turn against something, they say it's "destroying Europe"?

They were called Franks at the time you fuck. They hadn't adopted Latin customs yet and were still Germanic. They didn't become formally French until the Carlogonian renaissance under Charlemagne.

>islam
Arabs did that before they were muslim. After religion of pice became a thing they ding invent shit coz only allah is allowed to invent things. They wete good travelers and astronomers. That's why many stars have arab names

This

The Vikings and Magyars settled down after they were converted. The Muslims raided the southern coasts of Spain, France and Italy right up until the French took over Algeria in the 1830s.

The current Bishop of Rome is a Jesuit. They've been trying to take over the Vatican for years.

The Christian political movements in Europe are little more than leftist catch all parties that grew up during the Cold War as a bulwark against further red infiltration.

Looking at the churches, particularly those of England and Scandinavia, have been compromised.

The only self respecting Christians I have seen are in Bible study groups.

>The only self respecting Christians I have seen are in Bible study groups.

So a non-factor. I'm fine with having those as casualities if we can destroy the leftism peddling shit that is the rest.

>Wikipedia
>Wikipedia
>Wikipedia

reminder that Wikipedia uses Buzzfeed as a source

>t. 2-time bad guy that got sick of losing and changed his evil British ways

>So a non-factor
Yes, but they aren't many in number.

As for the laity in the pews, they are sheep. They don't understand what they are supporting because they don't read the Bible. The churches just cement what the media already tells them.

In the United States the traditional media is on its last legs.

>They don't understand what they are supporting because they don't read the Bible.

Have you read the parable of the sheep and goats?

>Using wikipedia as a legitimate source

Good b8 m8

KEK IS PRO CRUSADE
CHECK EM
H
E
C
K

E
M

if crusades never happened ottomans wouldnt have gained as much as power. Crusades fucked europe over but at the same time it left a place to grow and unite. The crusades is one of the biggest events in the world history , its hard to imagine what would have happened if they succeeded or never happened in the first place. There are too many variables and the timespan is too fucking long

>- Roman Empire collapses
by other "white men"
>- White man attacked from all sides by foreigners
by other "white men"
>- white man stable under Christianity
if white men killing other white men from 476 to 1945 is stability to you ...
>- white man stays white man under Christianity
pic related

American Evangelism is comparable to ISIS at this point in being this delusional about religion

...

>Byzantium is begging for help. So instead of helping out, sack the capital of Christian Byzantine.

Protip: During the Third Crusade, Friedrich Barbarossa asked the Byzantine Empire for a right for safe passage , and the emperor accepted. Afterwards, Byzantine troops attacked the German army, since the Byzantine Empire was allied with Saladin in secret.

That led to Byzantium's saccing during the Fourth Crusade .

I presume you're talking about the Iberian wars. Those are unrelated to the crusades.

>An invasion attempt in 732 ad justifies a war 400 years later?

All of these did.,

youtu.be/cQaLjnkBnKo
youtu.be/GeGgZPFOfT0
youtu.be/kDP6OHIZqrQ
youtu.be/N6NHGaIrfFc
youtu.be/TS9pz6Dtef8
youtu.be/qq1EFqd7iwA
youtu.be/4m11g0437lQ
youtu.be/DMqwHbocIA8
youtu.be/n-zXHT97xXM
youtu.be/DMqwHbocIA8
youtu.be/zUULSDXydrQ
youtu.be/482T6U_G8Yo

the arab conquests triggered the dark age in Europe, cutting Europe off from trade wealth from the east led to feudalism

>400 years later

that was when the roman emperor begged the west for help against the Seljuk empire. Basically turks swarmed in and shit got real, they replaced arabs as the figurehead of islam from 10th century onwards

>Crusades were defensive wars
No, you obstinate, historically illiterate revisionist barnacle. The defensive wars were the campaigns fought in Iberia as a response to Muslim invasions of Iberia.

>Byzantium dindu nuffin
>30 years war are related to Crusades
kek, also:
>killing the Cathares was wrong
>the 30 years war was wrong
If the Cathares and the Albigeois was dealt with as harshly and as early as possible, it was to avoid something like the 30 years war. Which was retrospectively, the lesser evil.

Would you like to explain how the petty christian kingdoms of iberia differ from those in the holy land before muslim conquest?

>Christian
>cather
Nice try

...