IT (1990) was absolute trash

prove me wrong,

Protip: you can't

IT (2017) is pure kino tho

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/houP7mAjZ0o
youtu.be/vRuhS8-WKbE
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

You are correct

tim curry
spooky clown in a sewer
could actually suspend disbelief because there wasn't CGI and BRMMMMM noises every 2 minutes

Tim Curry is a meme actor.

they're both shit

bad movie, but contains some genuinely terrifying images

at least they built a dam

>>suspend disbelief

being as retarded as you are I have no doubts you could

youtu.be/houP7mAjZ0o

(1990)
>contains some genuinely terrifying images
>Closely follows the books order of things.
>Only movie you'll get to see that jumps back and forth from adult to children just like the book
>Contains excellent child actors for Beverly, Richie, and Bill
>Henry hates Mike because he's black. They didn't take the safe route like they did in the R rated 2017 version
>Pays homage to the adults much better than any other IT movie has (so far)
>Tim Curry as IT is very memorable and frightening
>The atmosphere is sad akin to the book. New 17 IT doesn't have the sad feels in it.

dumb squirtleposter

How many hours a day are you on Sup Forums, uridon? I genuinely want to know.

name a scene in the 2017 flick that can top this

protip: you can't

The swimming scene

>Tim Curry as IT is very memorable and frightening
you mean campy and unwillingly funny

It was much more scary.

It's kino up until the end when they use the spider. Ech.

I post in short bursts

LOL

No

DO YA HAVE PRINCE ALBERT IN A CAN?

No one cares shill

Saged

Name a scene from the 2017 It more creepier than this

youtu.be/vRuhS8-WKbE

literally any

I still don't understand what happened to Henry there. Why did It leave Henry alive? Why did his hair turn white?

lmao how in the fuck is this scary

Based Uridon, your reviews are the best.

well, he's a clown

Ur last point is good, and one I felt but hadn't identified.

The new movie lacked the really disturbing quality the old one, and the book, had. Kings works aren't necessarily scary, more unsettling. I think the dude himself is a bit sick and this is channelled nicely in his work. Kubrick actually caught that sense in the shining despite kings assertions to the contrary.

This new it seemed too kitschy for the subject matter. Where was the grief? In the first version and book there's a lethal sense of threat and evil to the town that unsettles, like something horrible and ugly is going down . The new one is body horror but you're not as battered by it. Would be a potentially brave move to start the second movie with the gay guys getting killed as it watches. Would add a bit more real threat or something to the film, desanitise it

>I still don't understand what happened to Henry there. Why did It leave Henry alive? Why did his hair turn white?

Well it just fed, didn't need to eat him. You also shouldn't look directly at the deadlights as they're uknowable.

So basically the Ark of the Covenant levels of we don't have to explain shit.