So is this show actually a giant "FUCK DRUMPH, FUCK DA PATRIARCHY!" circle jerk...

So is this show actually a giant "FUCK DRUMPH, FUCK DA PATRIARCHY!" circle jerk, or is that just a forced meme created by the liberal media? Is the show actually good quality?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aisha
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

does rory gilmore have nude scenes in this?

why can't it be good quality AND be FUCK DRUMPH, FUCK DA PATRIARCHY? Are those two things mutually exclusive?

Go be a faggot somewhere else.

>bashing you over the head with politcal messages that pander to the mainstream political climate
>good
Yes they are mutually exclusive

HELLO

Like clockwork

It's based off the Islamic Revolution in Iran according to the author of the book

It's a depiction of fictional Christians roleplaying
an actual Islamic theocracy.

That image doesnt apply to my point. Im asking about the actual point of the show, not worrying about stupid identity politics

It's on Hulu, what do you think? They took an insufferable Canadian poet's pretty decent novel (written during a time when the US Christian Right actually looked powerful and scary to feminists and other shitters) and made it into a DUDE LMAO BECAUSE OF DRUMPF A RIGHT-WING CHRISTIAN THEOCRACY IS RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER LMAO feminist circlejerk

which is ironic considering Iran currently has more female university students than male students, and a female vp.

But hey, if ((they)) say Iran uses women as babymaking slaves, it must be true!

It's a good show.

I love how not wanting to be beaten over the head with shitty sensationalist politics now makes you a Sup Forumstard / alt righter

Cry more, faggot.

It doesn't do that though.

>he doesn't have a point to make so he just falls back on a lazy insult
Why are you even bothering to post?

>if ((they)) say Iran uses women as babymaking slaves, it must be true!
They do though you filthy mudslime.
And Muhammad was a warlord kiddiefucker

I love how on normie websites and comment sections there's always people saying shit like "omg this could sooo happen in Drumpfs America" until someone points out that shit like this DOES happen in Muslim countries and all the Islam apologists start crying and screaming racism

>implying I even like Trump
I dont like Hillary either but I would still be pretty turned off by a show that was literally crafted to pander to anti hillary shills and portrayed her as some sort of dictator. I love how you think youre not an idealouge, yet you have an extremely black and white world view

Watch a couple episodes and formulate your own opinion on it. That's what grown ups do.

>sterile manchild westerner complaining about people who actual have kids while knowing nothing about iran

Muhammad was twice the man that faggot Jesus ever was.

>literally crucified like a low bandit and dying a literal virgin

I bet the romans raped him when he was in prison like the little bitch he was

Idk man it's just a good show.

>muh ebul chrishtun patriarchy
funny. STD rates, suicide rates, alcoholism, drug abuse, and rates of clinical depression are all skyrocketing among women in Western countries. Women were never happier, healthier, and more fulfilled then under the Christian patriarchy.

>Idk man
Clearly. All you know how to do is post reaction images while convincing yourself youre better than the people you hate and believing your some sort of independent thinker

I NEED SOMEONE TO ANSWER THIS

WOMEN BEWARE! WHITE CAUCASIAN HETEROSEXUAL STRAIGHT CHRISTIAN MEN WITH PENISES ARE PLANNING RIGHT THIS VERY MOMENT TO CHOP YOUR CLITORIS OFF OF YOUR VAGINA!!!!

>elizabeth moss obsessed with feminism and FUK DA PATRIARCHY!
>she's a fucking scientologist

Iran has 13 vice presidents at any one time though. The "First" Vice President is always a dude.

The book was also written in the mid 80s. It's pretty hard to say that women's lives at least among the middle class didn't change under the theocracy. Although, it might be better now some 40 years later.

Well regardless of how he lived or died at least he wasn't a pedophile.

Muhammad married his last wife, Aisha, when she was six. He fucked her when she was nine. When he was 53. In the joint they call them niggas short-eyes.

Based Ayatollah

>You
>Giving a shit about women
>Ever having children
Pick one and only one

>Muhammad married his last wife, Aisha, when she was six. He fucked her when she was nine. When he was 53. In the joint they call them niggas short-eyes.

literally all slander from his enemies, regardless, you must think Sparta and Romans are "Based" and "Civilized" even though they glorified sodomy

Makes sense, since it's one of the least sexist religions out there at the moment.

Mate. Chill. I just think it's good.

and also, Aisha is a lying whore, she insitgated civil war after Muhammad died and made a whole series of lies about him becuase she was at war with his family. Also, these flimsy "hadiths" that claim he married her when was 9 were written by someone who live 900 years after the Prophets death. There is not a single contemporary account of what you are accusing him of

Sorry my Shia friend. It's not just in the hadiths, and not only agreed upon by the majority of Islamic scholars, it's also part of the historical record;

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aisha

Muhammad was a fat, hairy pedophile who raped a nine year old child when he was 53. Some "perfect man" lol.

Literally in the link you sent me.

>"Muslim authors who calculate Aisha's age based on the more detailed information available about her sister Asma estimate that she was over thirteen and perhaps between seventeen and nineteen at the time of her marriage"

Listen man, I honestly dont care, I just wish people would think for themselves and see behind the propaganda. Im not even a religious muslim, but I try to approach every topic with an open mind and rational reading. Be clear-headed and do your own research, dont take everything at face value

Let me ask you, do you trust modern day depictions of Jesus? With all the mockery they do of him on tv nowadays? What if all that made up stuff about him became canon 1000 years from now, does that make it true? Those in power will always try to belittle the great men who lived in the past whos role model is a danger to the status quo.

Take Jesus for example, this pussified "turn the other cheek" crap was passed on through generations by tyrants who feared the justice and model of Jesus who took a sword and punished the money-changers, they belittle Jesus so no one sees him as a role model therefore nullifying the threat of anyone emulating him. The Arab world had a similar misfortune, tyrants slandering muhammad centuries after his death because his teachings wouldve nullified their tribal rule

think, man think dont be a pleb

not the user you replied too. dont really give a fuck about jesus my dude. pls remove yourself from europe thanks

Yes, there are some Islamic scholars, a small minority as you can see from the number of citations who put the age of consummation in her teens. The overwhelming majority however put it at nine.

>Aisha's age at the time she was married to Muhammad has been of interest since the earliest days of Islam, and references to her age by early historians are frequent.[11] According to Sunni scriptural Hadith sources, Aisha was six or seven years old when she was married to Muhammad with the marriage not being consummated until she had reached puberty at the age of nine or ten years old.[10][11][12][13][14][23][24][25] For example, Sahih al-Bukhari states that Aisha narrated that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).Sahih al-Bukhari, 7:62:64

As for Jesus I don't think he even really existed.

Muhammad did exist. And the fact he fucked a nine year old, among others things the hadiths say that would fondle in her bath when she was six by the way, is part of the historical record.

Islam was created to tame tribal nonsense and desert culture, instead desert culture conquered Islam.

It's bad show, I dropped it Ep1, I don't know why Sup Forums suddenly post some threads about it?Because the stupid award? You ppl never learn don't you, since last year these awards become pure propaganda, why even bother to post.

And again it's really bad show, the story is full of unrealistic event and paranoid idea from a old lady.

I marvel at someone who lives in our times and sees the propaganda from every side and the fake news people make up and still thinks that "majority=truth" Anyways, this Bukhari wrote his book 250 years after the prophets death.
>posting online will save europe

I dont live in your steaming shitpile of a continent dont worry.

>is part of the historical record

the historical record is a huge point of contention within even muslims themselves, I just love when a westerner comes on here with having memorized wikipedia "as historical record" and lectures me on matters he knows nothing of as if his word is absolute truth

literally me on the far left

>As for Jesus I don't think he even really existed.

She gets her clit cut off.

This book was mad shitty.
Why the fuck are you faggots even bothering with the TV adaption?

>So is this show actually a giant "FUCK DRUMPH, FUCK DA PATRIARCHY!" circle jerk, or is that just a forced meme created by the liberal media?
Sounds like your mind is already made up.

>when every politician, celebrity, and media head shits on Trump but you think being anti-Drumpf makes you anti establishment

Lol

Don't bother trying to explain anything, wiki warriors will just shout you down

>the viewpoints of vocal and enthusiastic fans of a program have nothing to do with the content of said program

This nine years old thing is not even controversial among Islamic scholars. You'll notice if you read the citations literally 95% of Islamic scholars agree on it. Its not even really in dispute. In fact it's mostly some white dudes who are the dissenting voice.

Regardless, even if you ignore the pedophile stuff he was mostly a huckster and a charlatan who engaged in preemptive war and routine acts savagery throughout his campaign. I mean Christianity was mostly derived from Judaic stuff but yours is a knock off of that with straight plagiarism in multiple parts. Its fanfic really. Its the Twilight of religions.

Really I used to be just as critical of Christianity but the last ten years made me realise compared to Islam it really is mostly benign. Your religion and your culture in general really are a blight. The remaining part of this century is going to be a slowly increasing struggle against you across Europe and beyond.

Your Shia, so really I consider you generally much more civilized than Sunnis and if it was just you guys maybe multiculturalism could have worked. But were past the point where that matters anymore, and the distinction will be lost in what's to come as well.

>As for Jesus I don't think he even really existed.
Well I'm glad that you've conducted some of your own research that disproves what an overwhelming majority of historians believe. Where can I see your work?

Dry your tears, friend, it'll be okay

This show is literally victimization porn, women watch it to feel outraged because their real lives are cushy as fuck.

>preemptive war and routine acts savagery throughout his campaign
Literally every battle he fought was after the other side violated terms of peace multiple times. He suffered years of starvation and persecution from the polytheists before even fighting back when a quranic verse ordered him to fight in self-defense
>But were past the point where that matters anymore, and the distinction will be lost in what's to come as well.
Im so scared im quaking in my boots
>I mean Christianity was mostly derived from Judaic stuff but yours is a knock off of that with straight plagiarism in multiple parts.
Muhammad never hid the fact that Islam was meant as a continuation of Judaism and Christianity, youre not some genius who reached a conclusion that requires great intellect
>he was mostly a huckster and a charlatan
just throwing out buzzwords I see

Also, ive told u a million times, the pedophilia stuff was state-sanctioned slander by tyrants after his death, if you cant get it through your thick skull and cant see past the fact that historians hired by these tyrants wrote the history, thats your problem

Youre a very superficial person with a very superficial understanding of issues. I dont mean to offend you, but your arguments are just childish and a repetition of things u have heard or read elsewhere, you dont have a single original or creative thought

That image only works when you talk shit about somthing in the PAST that they enjoyed Wich right wing people never do, only a liberal would shit on somthing they was nostalgic for

Once again nu males miss the point

Who are the "tyrants" and state-sponsored historians?
>you dont have a single original or creative thought
Why would you have original/creative thoughts about a historical event?

I'm glad I saved this today

Let me remind you all that "taqaiyah" allows the shitskin in this thread to lie through his teeth To further his religious agenda

I actually have a question for muslims.
I get the whole religion thing yadda yadda, but there's sections in the koran where Mohammed just writes little special bonuses for himself only he can have and these pop up so often.
How do you even mental gymnastics that? The first thing any bullshitter cult leader does is give himself special allowances.

>repeating James Woods arguments word by word
>Who are the "tyrants"
The Umayyad and subsequent Abbasid monarchies who claimed to be caliphates even though Islam strictly forbids monarchy

>and state-sponsored historians?
Back then, there was only state-owned religious schools. People who spoke contrary to what the ruler of the time wanted, or wrote contrary to the governments wishes were persecuted and executed and not even allowed to release their books in most cases

>Why would you have original/creative thoughts about a historical event?
Because the historical record you mentioned earlier is tarnished and riddled with inconsistencies. Things out of character, things that dont make sense with the rest of what was transmitted, Basically every major historical source from that time period is useless due to the aforementioned reasons I told u about the governments controlling the schools and what gets published, as well as the fact that all these "accounts" of Muhammads life were published centuries after his death by people generations removed from anyone who had seen or met him

>muhammad got cucked by a 9 year old whore
lmao

>screenshot your own post
>Yeah, I'm a badass like that

There's no proof of Jesus existing. There's a cult of Judaism that grew into a religion based around him, but we don't have proof of his existence.

>James Woods
i meant david wood

>Listen man, I honestly dont care
clearly not

Literally go back to r/atheism
You new atheists had your spotlight now it's done. Go listen to your shitty Sam Harris podcast

It's based on the pinnacle of Canadian literature.

And it's a piece of shit.

Yeah Romans had no documentation of Jesus...

I felt so conflicted watching this show. On one hand it has the slickest production I've ever seen of a television show, when it's good it's amazing, but when it's bad it's ALL MEN ARE EVIL the show. I honestly don't know what to think.

>Im so scared im quaking in my boots

You already said you are outside Europe so you are probabaly mostly safe anyway. I mean except from other Muslims.

I mean it doesnt exactly take a crystal ball to see what's coming. You guys follow the same pattern wherever you go and increase in numbers. You end up causing violence, bloodshed, socitial upheaval and eventually civil war. Really you are the only people on earth worse than the Jews in this respect.

The rest of this century is a slow build-up to what is going to culminate in you getting it good and hard from multiple directions. I mean an absolute historic fucking. It will make what Muhammad did
to poor little nine year old Aisha look like kindergarten. And the amusing thing is you will deserve every bit of it.

see

>he said, as his triple chin trembled as he cackled in glee while typing with his cheetos stained fingers in the dark of his coalburning whore mother's basement

isn't this the one about japanese/korean lesbians or something?

No, it's pretty much accurate. I can't even go back to my home neighbourhood now or I'd be stabbed by Muslims.

kek i meant i dc if he believes me or not. i just wish people werent so easily misled

Or maybe it's because you're a pussy

so does this movie have good spank bank material? Rapes and nudity etc.. or is it one of those smarmy shows that shows more manbutt than actual boobs and none of the named female characters ever have sex even though they are literally sex slaves?

Yeah they do seem to rip off, enslave and rape both men and women equally.

Donald Trump appeared on the cover of Playboy, as an actual real-life playboy, and his major local enemy were the Moral Majority types who do not consider him to be a Christian, so clearly the best way to satirize him is with a para-Mormon sex-fearing woman-hating Christian fundamentalist cult.
What this is is, they had this ready to go for Hillary. They were going to milk fictitious female grievance emotions. Women never complain about real problems but will orgasm with rage over things that are not real.

>tfw the women literally wear a (((lampshade)))

OYYY GEVALT

?

So your contention is that Muhammad was a peace loving guy and all the violence was a prank that got out of hand? Here's the thing, Christians were persecuted by the state too, viciously in fact, but the difference is that the NT matches what early Christianity practiced. There's not really any discrepancy between what they said they were about and what they did. Islam on the other hand claims to be all about peace, but even today it bears violent fruit, and it stands to reason that this was true in Muhammad's time as well. Become a Catholic dude, embrace the Logos of Christ.

>paying to absolve sins
lmao

Because instead of looking it up and finding that it is based on a novel in the 80s we have to assume it's immediately about modern politics.

was this a /lit/ thread?

AMWF is patrician pairing

they should show more of it

Sounds like a bunch of dried up roasties that no white man wants and desperate manlet slants.

I've never paid for indulgences, show me a modern church that does. You should seriously look up the history of it though.

>Catholic
You're a good guy, better than the one ITT from r/atheism. Thanks for the offer though.

The cast and crew and hype have all been about the application. This is like when "people" tried to pretend that 300 had no connection whatsoever to the neocon push for war with Iran or the "clash of civilizations" narrative. Any particular ideas on why a thoroughly irrelevant novel "from the 80s" would be brought in right now? Perhaps they were just going in alphabetical order?

It's anti-Islam

>Depicts a society where religious extremism and dangerous populism robs women of their rights and lets misogyny rule
>Waaah muh male rights and feelings are offended by this!

This is what you sound like.

it's fascinating how they push the muslim sins on christians.

Go read global rule 3.

>I suck cock

This is what you sound like.

>not wanting to be beaten over the head with shitty sensationalist politics

This is exactly why we dont like Sup Forums though, good you understand.

>Become a Catholic dude, embrace the Logos of Christ.

What are you doing on Sup Forums, E. Michael Jones?