Should the monster in a Lovecraftian epic be done with CGI or practical effects Sup Forums?
Also who would you cast as the protagonist? My pick would be the rock.
Should the monster in a Lovecraftian epic be done with CGI or practical effects Sup Forums?
Other urls found in this thread:
damn nice pic very lovecraftian
What about the aliens from the Arrival? They look like that
He shouldn't be shown at all. Way to miss the fucking point.
youtube.com
hard to make a better cgi lovecraftian horror movie than this
That's stupid though. If I wanted that I'd just close my eyes. I want to see a real representation of it
It would be really Lovecraftian.
getting a strong lovecraftian vibe from this post, nice
what ps2 game is that?
HAHAHAHAHHA LOVECRAFT SNEED FUCK ANF SUCK KAFKAESQUE BANE FOR YOU SNEED LOVECRAFT FOR SNEEEEDDDDDD holy fuck toy giys are original and hilarious
get this hothead outta here
What a Lynchian post
All better than Bane? Hothead and For you. They're so shit that I'm guarenteed someone will reply to my post saying "For You"
some subtle kafkaesque symbols in this
for you
Very Roganian.
...
>Should the monster in a Lovecraftian epic be done with CGI or practical effects Sup Forums?
A mix of both.
Idris Elba
The monster would not be showed, his shape is supposed to drive you crazy when you see it. Really would be stupid to make him just some Godzilla monster.
t. has never read a single story by H.P. Lovecraft
>dat bone girth
Has this Cthulhu been SMASHED and SLAMMED?