Frequency of word "racism" in New York Times, chronologically

interpret as you may

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=uxOsUlJOYj8
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times#Carlos_Slim_loan_and_investment
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

not enough. Every 5th word needs to are racist.

FARK! This is making me think waaaay tooo much.


So had racism gone up, or just the accuracu of their records.

I bet they said racist a lot more back when slaves were around. Google just wasn't there to record it.


Sup Forums btfo out once again

EDIT: suck my dick new zealand

I was just gammin.


But desu, back in 1860 they probs only had 20 articles a day. compares to 2000 clickbait shit today.

Good data, but its easily flawed.

it's percent of total though

Makes sense. The insanity started taking off in the radical 60s and 70s, the 80s were more conservative, the 90s were the era of political correctness taking hold, then it dipped again after 9/11, and is now skyrocketing as the Left smells victory and is now going in for the kill against everyone and everything it deems politically suspect.

>tfw I lived through most of these decades and have watch the rot spread

Who died and made you decider of facts.

You've just embarrassed me in-front of the entire internet.

I can't believe you've done this.

Emus and grigit

It's ok, I still love you

>I bet they said racist a lot more back when slaves were around.
What? Of course they wouldn't.
Slaves were around because racism wasn't an issue to anyone, and because it wasn't an issue, it wouldn't have been talked about.

This. What is now called "racism" was pretty much just common sense in the 19th century and didn't need its own label, let alone a negative one.

It's too late. They've triggered something they can't control.

What happened to cause that blip back in the 1850's?

I used to kind of like NYT...

When racism was an actual problem, the powerful refused to admit it

Now they they do nothing but decry racism, we can be sure the problem has been solved.

...

The first utterances of what would be civil war.

...

Don't look at us, it's the average white guy that has no impact on your life making your life terrible.

Yours truly

D.C. and (((bankers)))

2010 was a big fat mistake.

youtube.com/watch?v=uxOsUlJOYj8

In the same way, if "white privilege" were actually real then white people would easily be able to suppress all mention of it -- it wouldn't be fucking taught in every school and college in the country.

the screams of communists dying.

"The sexist, racists of the South want to keep their transgender slaves."?

>(((Sulzberger)))

Damn the idiots are out tonight, son!

Look at the fucking 90's, lol. Were we suddenly super-racist in the 90's? How about from 2008 onwards when anyone who didn't like Obama became a racist?

Pay attention dumbasses.

Looks like there's a correlation between when America was great and when it wasn't going by how much the word "racist" is uttered

Bro... you just took my bait

Are you a chink?

Hey you took my bait too.

Whats going on here... Who are all these people?

Soon everyone will be a racist.

how'd you get on the internet?

I'M KOREAN
SON OF A BITCH AUSTRALIAN
AUSTRALIAN IS PIG
DO YOU WANT A MEAT PIE?
DO YOU WANT A CHIKO ROLL?
AUSTRALIAN IS PIG DISGUSTING
KEVIN RUDD IS A MURDERER
FUCKING AUSTRALIA

1850's autist not 1950's, looks like an error or something, or maybe it was leading up to the civils

Or any privilege

The callout culture we've developed COULD ONLY EXIST in a world without any real, institutional discrimination. Otherwise, the discrimination would discriminate against anything incriminating.

Look at the HuffPo Editors Board.
And all they can seem to talk about is how hard it is to be a woman

*The Institution would Discriminate against anything Incriminating

Still not allowed to name the jew, though. I wonder what that means

And in 2009 some super rich Mexican globalist bought a bunch of shares. What a coincidence.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_New_York_Times#Carlos_Slim_loan_and_investment

But then they started to correct the record.

>(((New York Times)))
There. I just interpreted it

Revolutions of 1848 maybe? Those we're definitely influenced by Marxist ideology, not by racism though.

Interesting curve on that.