Mother! is actually a film about mass immigration to the West

mother! is actually a film about mass immigration to the West.

Prove me wrong.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=Lf1T81djCd0
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

>Prove me wrong.
it was made by a hack.

Mommy was very bad.

went to go see it last night
theater was 80% full when it started
mid point it dwindles to around 50%
by the end there was only 3 rows still there
heard alot of guests murmuring and whispering as they left
some guy said "what a load of horse cock"

ha

does it criticize it or encourage it?

Liberals are so far gone. Nothing can bring them back to reality.
>muh feelings are hurt

Criticize. Shows what is the cost.

Will this make me like Jlaw again?

>nipples visible:the movie

Bardem is Merkel
JLaw is white Europe
The Acolytes are pakis and niggers
The little baby is the Rotherham 1400

>movie get shitted on by critics
hmm

nobody watched it anyway

>theater was 80% full when it started

why do people lie on Sup Forums?

What, do you mean you never go to the cinema, count the total amount of seats and then all the ones that are occupied in order to calculate a correct percentage of people in attendance?

lol retard

It's not about religion, climate, or immigration. It's his 8 1/2, Stardust Memories, a look inward about the machinations of his creative process and relationships.

...

>i have to project my delusions into everything because I don't have anything else
Sup Forumstards are not human

Not an argument

even though its a very VERY obvious stand in for the bible+some cheesy enviormentalist theme, it also does line up greatly with it being about the whole refugee crisis and what a disaster it is

An observation

>muh feelings and safe spaces

Darren Aronofsky is about as subtle as my taint

No

kek

>implying it wasn't christfags getting upset because they felt threatened even though the movie wasn't even criticizing them (with two minor exceptions directed at Catholics)

I feel like you're really overstating the difficulty in making a quick estimate.

Critics loved it or liked it. What are you talking about? It's the plebs that hated it.

...

If it was that, Armond White would've pretended to like it.

Nah, I'm mocking the sort of sad cunt who bothers to make such an observation.

Sup Forums = Butthurt Sup Forumsacks pretend they don't have a history of spreading their garbage everywhere and expect people to pretend it's not blatantly obvious what they're trying to do

>bruh, you just gotta turn your brain off, kek
??

Sup Forums is Sup Forums now? I thought it wasn't Sup Forums? Is Sup Forums alt-left?

What is Sup Forums and why can't you people make up your minds?

Is it genuinely something you care about when you go to the cinema? I go to watch a film, fumble around in the dark, find a seat then leave at the end.

Get a life, mate

>I'll pretend to be retarded, that will show him what a dumb liberal he is!

MOTY 2017

t. brainlet

not him, but I usually glance to check the overall attendance for a room of strangers for the particular day.
last movie I saw in theatres was that chris evans movie where he raises his sisters kid.

>dumb liberal
that's redundant

Meme of the Year?

Why can't we just get along fucking liberals ruined everything

Why do brainlets project their own thoughts on movies?

Isn't that the whole point?

so every film is just literal and not subtextual or artistic?

this film is, yes.

Prove yourself right first, dumb nigger.

The fact that the tryhard of a director LITERALLY EXPLAINS WHAT THE MOVIE MEANS in every god damn interview he does.

He wants to be Lynch so badly, but then explains his whole movie (as if it wasn't blatantly clear with his shit writing).

He's throwing you a red herring

You're trying too hard. He is not, and has never been some great auteur filmmaker. It's all surface level schlock which HE thinks is deep and profound.

Its a film about a shit lead actress who can't emote and act out the scenes.

t. brainlet

Barely. As an afterthought if not the literary equivalent of a Freudian slip. For that interpretation were to hold together, it would be the crowds of fans and the narcissistic "poet" driving "mother" away. Also, if that really is his intended allegory, then it's even more insulting knowing he thinks of himself as a god. If this movie is an accurate gauge of his writing chops and mastery of metaphor, then he's no "god." He's barely even a "preacher."

anyone who thinks Sup Forums leans left is fucking retarded

It's self deprecating my dude, admitting he's a monster with an inflated ego. His ex plays His ex, standing in the rubble of their previous relationship before the new, younger model comes along.

it's just an edgy art film using christian allegory. Nothing more

BUT
it's funny that that movie came out now since here in Austria we'll soon have elections and one party made a youtube ad with the exact same premise:
youtube.com/watch?v=Lf1T81djCd0

Death of the author. It's about whatever your own mind concludes.

Facts. His review, as well, nails it more than any other.

It's a biblical allegory where humans fuck everything up. The director stated as much in great detail. You are already proven wrong before posting this bait thread.

That's what you've been told

Yeah. By Aronofsky, a left wing spiritualist hollywood arthouse pseudeo-intellectual. If you have compelling evidence he's a closeted Sup Forumsfaggot post it with your argument or shut the fuck up.

death of the author is retarded

no, your piece of shit isn't art. It's not up to interpretation what it means. You're not a genius by creating something vague and then saying you can interpret it any way you want.

Just because there is an infinite set of possible interpretation of any piece of art, doesn't mean all interpretations are equally valid.

You seem upset that you're incapable of thinking for yourself.

And he is inspired by their petrified hearts. Like I said, if it's intentional, it's a miracle, not to mention that it fails to incorporate any of the earlier allegorical figures.

>a home invasion movie can be interpreted as someone invading your home
you're the next Roger Ebert OP

lol

>movie is about climate change
>Sup Forums thinks it's about immigration being bad

>it's about Christianity, religion, environmentalism, feminism, immigration crisis, the creative process etc.
Just that it's so divisive with so many wildly different interpretations means it's not a bad film

Of all the Mother threads how comes no one has said she has a nude scene in this?

>Just because there is an infinite set of possible interpretation of any piece of art, doesn't mean all interpretations are equally valid.
Good thing that's not what death of the author is about. It's about how the author's interpretation is not inherently more valid.

Cause most people who talk about it haven't seen it.

Because very few people have actually seen it. It's not doing well.

i know that. i was saying "death of the author is retarded" and then i replyied to your point about "It's about whatever your own mind concludes.", since that's an intelectually lazy argument

Because we all literally raped her 3 years ago

Her nudes have no meme value anymore.

Her hottest scene was the first 10 min where she was walking around in a see-through nightgown

There's not all that many interpretations, and the only lines of demarcation are plebs who don't like it, pseuds who think it's deep, and patricians who despise it for being poorly-written, preachy, navel-gazing twaddle that's not half so in need of explanation as its pretentious twat of a director thinks it is.

Aronofsky has started buying too much into his own headlines and boy, does it ever fucking show.

This.

>everyone is Sup Forums if they express vies on immigration

i've already seen her nudes when she was hotter

>climate change leads to more immigration

check mate commie

Sup Forums is the place that obsesses over that shit day and night and has a habit of "subtly" pushing their shit on other boards, it's a pretty high probability guess.

And is Sup Forums the place that obsesses over Sup Forums?

beautiful

JLAW IS A MESS

you have never talked with a non-right wing voter, who opposes immigration IRL? I have
Don't tell me he was an undercover Sup Forums agent

Mother was deceptively marketed, they probably thought it was going to be a horror movie.

No it's the place where Sup Forums cries whenever people don't put up with their shitty attempts to "redpill" people.

And yet here you are, obsessing over Sup Forums. Interesting.

Sup Forums - Alt-Right pussies and left wing retards refuse to ignore things they don't like

YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED TO DISCUSS THE POLITICS IN FILM HERE, IT'S FOR BANE MEMES AND SHITPOSTING RICK & MORTY REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>radical centrism, fuck yeah!

A
BIG
FAT
MESS

>people on here mock mother!
>fail to realize this exact same type of shit happened whenever moot would post

why does it have an exclamation mark

So it's not about a boy with a pretty mommy and how they have a secret relationship society wouldn't understand?

The house is earth. It's about overpopulation.

Can't because you're right

It's about niggers taking over the porn industry and lobbing BBCs about

no, that's "womb"