Corporations

Do you agree with leftists' insistence that corporations and the rich must pay their fair share?

No more free shit for niggers.

Lol if we raise their taxes any higher they will just go to another country with a lower tax rate and we lose billions in tax revenue and many jobs good idea libtards

>Do you agree with leftists' insistence that corporations and the rich must pay their fair share?

By definition, paying "their fair share" isn't what the left wants. What the left is really saying with their bullshit dishonest way of phrasing it is, "I want free stuff, rich people have stuff, give me their stuff".

Yep.

profits are literally the exploitation of workers. We should not tolerate those who would siphon our resources without fairly contributing to the well being of our community and society as a whole.

you are such an intellectual user

I agree that everyone should pay their "fair share", that'll start with niggers and spics and poor white trash actually paying net taxes.

I agree. The fair share being a flat amount of money, equal for everyone. That's a fair share. A percentage is already unfair, since some people have to pay more than the others while getting the same benefits.
If you and two of your neighbors wanted to buy a lawnmower to share, you would all pay 1/3 of the cost, regardless of income. Why would it work any different when more people are involved?
The poor must pay their fair share and stop milking successful people.

freeeeedumb. tackses are coercion. leeberty means lettin rich people buy all the political influence. we dont need no public education. smart people think they know everything and make me feel bad about my ged. not like we use roads anyway. my pickup truck can go offroad. and to hell with the millitary. let them mudslims come over here with their tanks and jets i'll shoot em all with my .22. roll tide!

socialism is fucking annoying stop trying to eat at the big boys table we already told you no so many times

No because they're retarded

a productive corporation shouldn't be punished for producing things

on the other hand if you're some kike banker/media mogul you shouldn't even have a job tb-h

Corporate taxes should be zero, but there should be no refunds or corporate subsidies. Individuals are already taxed why should you tax corporations?

They don't have to "pay their fair share" which is just leftist buzzword nonsense.

What they need to be is fucking controlled like the wild dangerous animals they are.

What would they do without their precious Starbucks then? Talking about all their totally popular stupid fucking Jew bullshit? You know.... Rhianna, and what not.

Yes

Yes, I think it's important that the state is able to get what it needs in return for public services and its handling of international affairs, and I think people hoarding too many resources is a failure of evolution. The perfect rich man's budget, would include buying whatever they want to be comfortable, and finding a way to productively spend the rest of their money, because from the standpoint of evolution, an organism that passes on all of its wealth to its tribe or species is better than one that just squanders, wastes, or hoards it.

What if we put a cap on profit margin?

Well to be honest most of the "rich man's" money doesn't even exist.

because 400 years ago if you had a chest full of silver and gold you were filthy rich.
Now you have yuge numbers of money that will never ever exist and only has value because modern society is retarded that fucks over everybody else

What's "Fair share"?

If its not significantly above the amount everyone would get after wealth-redistribution, then there's no incentive to create wealth or invent new things.


tl;dr get fucked commies

hurr

Because the government is good at allocating and efficiently using resources.

corporations must end

Well, that's fair enough, I lived in Ohio for two years, I've seen the infamous "crumbling infrastructure" of the "cities" there. and I totally agree that the free market functions as a collective intelligence that is better in most cases at allocating resources than a totally government controlled five-year-plan style economy is.

But, collective intelligences thrive when there is intellectual diversity, buyers and sellers, in the simplest terms, and a totally free market has a way of weeding out most of the dissent. The flash crash in 2010 is a good example. Traders use more and more advanced software to compete in merchant exchanges, and the traders that can't afford the software or keep up with technology get pushed out, diversity thins up, and sellers disappear, so assets get passed around like a game of hot potato and resource allocation fails.

I don't think there's a middle ground where the government isn't needed, and I think that the government injects some diversity in spending into a market that would otherwise fall into one column.

i'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that corporate subsidies are for CEO niggers

or maybe we should throw them in fucking jail.

look at the fascist justify his taxes being stolen from him and being given to someone else - the wealthy

>logic is communist hurr durr meme

Can you define "fair share?" Because right now, the top one percent pays nearly half of all income taxes despite only earning sixteen percent of annual income. Do you think that's fair? Or are you talking about equity instead of fairness?

nope
people don't have to work for them
people don't have to buy their shit
but they still do, any they do it with passion too. people still fall in line to by their shit and fall in line to apply for jobs working for these corporations.

Kill the corps.

The far left are redpilled on corporations controlling politics
The far right are redpilled on political corruption and the influence of think tanks and academia.

Remember, left vs right is the trap. It's the people versus the elite.

She has the perfect face for a cumshot.