>The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted on September 6-7, 2016 by Rasmussen Reports.
THIS WAS BEFORE TRUMP'S TOWN HALL DISASTER.
ITS OVER TRUMPKINS, HE LOST.
TRUMP BTFO
Ayden Ross
Other urls found in this thread:
infowars.com
thegatewaypundit.com
bbc.com
zerohedge.com
twitter.com
Robert Davis
...
Jaxson Price
ti to shilujes ili trolujes?
Luis Ross
>Rasmussen
A pollster that RCP doesn't even use, because they're so bad.
Yawn. I'll take CNN over them.
Benjamin White
Can someone tell me what an allepo is?
Daniel Hernandez
+4 is not winning, that's a landslide victory for Trump.
Adjusting the independent sample to a realistic number alone will give Trump more than 4 points, most likely (I haven't seen a single poll use enough independents)
Turnout alone would put Trump ahead
Non-voters entering the field alone would put Trump ahead
Assuming the voting won't be rigged, then Hillary will need to be +15 in the polls to be +4 in the actual election.
Adam Nguyen
TRUMP: “PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOTHING TO HIDE DON’T SMASH PHONES WITH HAMMERS”
infowars.com
Julian Assange: We Have Thousands of Cables Hillary Signed with “C” for Confidential- She Told FBI She Didn’t Know What It Meant
Trump says Putin 'a leader far more than our president'
bbc.com
"Clinton Foundation Is Charity Fraud Of Epic Proportions", Analyst Charges In Stunning Takedown
>sage
Sebastian Green
THIS
independents are being under polled on purpose
Its that simple
Connor Rivera
Pack up the tent time for perpetual sand nigger destruction under Hillary.
Jaxon Martinez
you always do this, yet you never learn.
a group won't simply turn to another side in this amount, nor will change it in one day. after any Trump lead, you always bring the advantage to Hillary in a way that is just not possible, not explainable.
in one word: pathetic
Justin Lopez
unshopped pic
Michael Ross
>Serbia
sage
Jackson Cox
Based Hillary is only leading by 4...in a Rasmussen poll...
Oh god...it's over...she's really going to lose...what will I do without my CTR checks...
Jonathan Powell
I doubt polls are even accurate. What's to stop someone from lying when polled just to fuck with them?
Samuel Wilson
just enjoy the moment and cash out while we can, I'm doing the same thing
Thomas Smith
All that being said, how do you explain the betting odds?
Betting companies have money to lose. They don't really have any biases. And since they're massive companies, I'm sure they aren't stupid and already know the ins and outs of the election.
pic related
It is worth noting however, when I put £100 on Trump to win, the odds were 3/1 for him. This was around 2 months ago.
Mason Barnes
Кoјa јe cвpхa твoг живoтa?
David Cox
The people who take these polls are biased, in who they ask, in how they compile and present
They have been consistently wrong by a big margin since at least 2010 over here , like 20% wrong!
Hudson Garcia
i don't trust any of these polls simply because i don't see 1 in 20 people changing their vote in the span of a week when nothing has even happened
Leo Murphy
Betting odds were against Brexit as well.
Hunter Long
THATS NOT A COUGH DROP
FUCK
EWW
Jacob Sanders
Well...2 months until election day. That first debate seems like yesterday. Whether Trump wins or loses the absolute shitshow that will go down here on election night will be a wonder to behond.
Juan Jenkins
Shilla. Nikom nikad ne odgovara na srpskom.