Humans have destroyed a tenth of Earth’s remaining wilderness in the last 25 years and there may be none left within...

>Humans have destroyed a tenth of Earth’s remaining wilderness in the last 25 years and there may be none left within a century if trends continue, according to an authoritative new study.

theguardian.com/environment/2016/sep/08/humans-have-destroyed-a-tenth-of-earths-wilderness-in-25-years-study

This is good right?

>save samples of DNA
>Private medical companies clone the shit out of everything
>shit is just even more expensive now

>Humans have destroyed a tenth of Earth’s remaining wilderness in the last 25 years and there may be none left within a century if trends continue
that's not how it works.

That's not how any of this works.

Normies actually fall for this shit

You need to come down to Alabama m8.
Anywhere you go there's wilderness, wilderness everywhere!

Remember in the 90's when trees weren't supposed to exist anymore by now?

Did people not know that trees are a renewable resource in the 90s?

Human capability always accelerates quickly enough so that we are able to fix the fuckups of the past in the future.
We could fix global warming right now if we really wanted to, without even lowering emissions. We have the ability to bring extinct species back to life as well.

Sounds like a ponzi scheme

Yes fuck nature! Poisonous cunt! We have to fuck it up the arse before it fucks us! So grab your chainsaws and your phosphates and get to work fuckers

So I'm guessing you need first world countries that already are preserving wilderness and not a part of this destruction to pay up so that the ones who've never followed the rules might be bribed into following them this time?

Yeah, we also ran out of oil like 10 years ago. And NYC and other cities are underwater now because of global warming, all the ice caps are melted. Glad I listened to these people.

>>Humans

Why don't they be more specific and just say "non-whites"?

Why do we need wilderness? What is its value? Why does a tree or a rock have some sort of divine importance to be protected, in a way that prevents the propagation of the human species?

As a conservation biologist, this post has given me AIDS.

Doesn't wilderness inevitably grow back?

They can't because most of what's being burned downed is used as farm land.

>As a useless intellectual masturbator
FTFY

Fun fact: there are more trees in the united states than there were 100 years ago.

If you want to blame anyone for wildlife being destroyed, blame the shitskins.

>conservation biologist
Things that aren't conscious have nothing more than aesthetic value

whatever you have to tell yourself to make you feel more secure

>conservation biologist
>we need to ensure the facet of evolution known as extinction never happens because muh fee-fees

maybe if everything you tried to conserve had a practical use, that would be a fun title, but you're just a nature SJW running around yelling about 'microbe lives matter'

Trees as live forms have inherent value, nature is good for humanity.
Basically what is the case but they'll conveniently leave it out.
"Humans" when niggers do it "whites" when whites do it.

They burn it, use it until the soil runs out of nutrients, then burn another patch and use that. Theyre not using it for very long.

Hailing form the land of lohn i can tell you that there are more trees here then there were 100 years ago but...

aforested wood for woodproduction is almost deserted of natural life there are no bugs, no animals, no natural decay. A deserted industrial park has more natural life then a forst nowadays.

There are almost no places left to really feel the solitude of nature.

This. In 1901, Britain has 9% Woodland, today it has 21% woodland.

Sup Forums sez:

Forests r the only tipe uv wildernesz!!!!!

-CO2
+O2

>but lets keep importing third worlders so we have over populate our own little countries and further destroy said wildernes

I don't see why being a "live" form means you have value when a tree has a comparative level of sentience and emotional complexity to a rock.

Nature is good for humanity, it's just less good than cities and railroads and timber, which is why we cut it down. If we didn't cut down trees most of the world would be wooded and there would be very few humans.

Kill all non whites = Instant greenie garden Tellus utopia.

Eh, nah, my German nigger. Wood farms are considered farms, not forests. You actually have an increasing amount of forest.

Fully grown trees take in a comparatively tiny amount of CO2 to ones that are growing. From that perspective it's better to cut down forests as we see fit and replant some saplings wherever's convenient.

Most people don't want to live on the sort of barren treeless mossy rock the UK has turned into over time just we can fit more muslims in our country.

Abbos turned most of Australia into a desert by using thier ancient-nature friendly method of hunting by burning entire forests and grabbing anything that comes out.
Trees evolved to counter this. TREES EVOLVED FASTER THAN ABBOS.

Don't pretend this is a modern problem.

>Trees evolved to counter this.
In what way? Do aussie trees not burn well?

you honestly think pic related has no effect on the global ecosystem?

face it, for best or worst, it's the age of men and everyone else is fucked

Some of our trees and plants only spread or spread best during bush fires. Animals have also learned to make homes in burnt out trees.

Calling aboriginals fauna like they used to is an insult to our fauna and flora.

We need another plague. Too many people in this world. This is why I am pro-abortion

you must be a nigger

only niggers don't get the spiritual appeal of nature

Ironic you saying that.

>10% * 4 = 100%

Gotta love that liberal math.

are you dumb or what? Some ecosystems are fragile, and once you break their balance, there can be no way to recover them.

You guys are a bunch of nigger that think that ecosystems are just a bunch of pine trees.

Fucking dumb niggers

The forecast is obviously sensationallist, thou

This, in most western countries forests are actually expanding. Even at the height of western industrial progress we still made some effort to preserve wilderness. Shitskins just consume everthying till there is nothing left then they starve. Just look at Africa, prime example.

99% of all species that have ever existed are extinct.

Nature could destroy this entire planet overnight.

We are nothing.

This is all futile.

They just want more money.

Again, forests aren't the only type of wilderness

let the dumb niggers Sup Forumstards masturbate with their "woodland" increase. They will cover their eyes