Nolan Batman Quadrology

Is the Nolan quadrology still the best DC movie franchise to date?
>Batman Begins
>Batman: Gotham Knight
>The Dark Knight
>The Dark Knight Rises
There are so many memorable scenes and characters like Seeye I. Aye, Dunn Hier, Draul, the big guy (can't remember his name), etc.
All jokes aside, it's a fun series for sure, and the fact that it's still discussed here so often after all these years is definitely impressive.

Other urls found in this thread:

imdb.com/title/tt1117563/faq
twitter.com/AnonBabble

It's so, so bad. Dour, sloppy, lacking imagination or vision. Lucas tier dialogue, awful action, not actually Batman but an impotent, ineffectual pussy. Ledger's performance is the one (1) single aspect of redeeming value.

Have you even seen all 4 films?

I have. Is the implication that it closes strong or something because TDKR is obviously a joke.

The final film in the quadrology is filled with Lovecraftian themes and Kafkaesque imagery that probably went right over your head. Maybe something like Ricky & Marty is more up your alley.

I think it went right over Gordon's head too

hehehe

That was bait.

What do you mean? So you haven't?

best kino

>disliking Nolan is bait
He's just that good huh

I preferred Batman IV: Empire strikes BRAAP

So now that we've reached an agreement, was Gotham Knight the best of the quadrology?

>Is the Nolan quadrology still the best DC movie franchise to date?

>>Batman: Gotham Knight

Nolan didnt directed any of the segments in Gotham Knight.

It's part of the DC extended canon universe.

Unfunny meme, kys

Gotham Knight sucked and isn't canon. TDKR was bad too. It is a decent series, elevated by Heath Ledger's Joker, but the last one brought it down a lot.

I love the cinematic filter you put on your phone. Very Kafkaesque.

but is not a Nolan film, so is not part of any "Nolan quadrology"

It's canon to the extended DC canon extended universe.

That means nothing. The producers themselves said it's not canon to Nolan's movies and "could fit in almost any Batman continuity."

Basically, not canon.

Wayne-kun was kawaii

>The producers themselves said it's not canon to Nolan's movies
They did not, actually. They said it was canon to the EXTENDED universe, which is, in fact, canon.

back to page 1

>Gotham Knight
lol

It's garbage for manchildren. I hope your post is bait.

>he hasn't seen Gotham Knight
You don't know kino

>Batman: Gotham Knight
What?

...

no meat touching.

>It's canon to the extended DC canon extended universe.

But again, is not a Nolan film, so is not part of a "Nolan quadrology".

Yes, it is.

>They said it was canon to the EXTENDED universe, which is, in fact, canon.
>Extended universe
>canonic universe
>are the same

kek

It's canon to itself, and canon to the extended universe, so it is canon

No, is not.
Return of the Jedi is not part of "Lucas trilogy" because Lucas only directed A New Hope.

But it is canon and thus a part of the trilogy

>It's canon to itself, and canon to the extended universe, so it is canon

Is official, but is not canon.

Yes, it is.

>But it is canon and thus a part of the trilogy

Whatever, "Batman Quadrology",but not "Nolan Quadrology"

Only the fact there is the prescence of a film not directed by nolan, break the concept of "Nolan Quadrology"

Nolan accepted it into his trilogy, which then became a quadrology

>Yes, it is.

imdb.com/title/tt1117563/faq

>Batman: Gotham Knight is an animated direct-to-video movie that borrows the setting of Christopher Nolan's Batman movies. While the producers have acknowledged that it is not meant to be a canon part of the Nolanverse
>is not meant to be a canon part of the Nolanverse
>is not meant to be a canon

check mate.

>Nolan accepted it into his trilogy, which then became a quadrology

source or fuck off.

Wrong

Nolan said it

>Nolan said it

Sauce then.
no?

Fuck off!

>who believe?
>A) IMDB
>B) a faggot on Sup Forums

hard choice.