What did Sup Forums think of this?

What did Sup Forums think of this?

I liked it back then and saw it like 10 times.
Looking back now it's kinda meh.

It wasn't the worst thing ever.

I saw it once in theaters and had a good time
Never felt like rewatching it

i watched it on dvd. it was pretty gud as my first exposure to the simpsons

also
>that disney comic cover parodying the movie at the time

This thing could have been epic if Fox hadn't mutilated the thing to appeal to casual moviegoers.

it didn't feel like a movie, it just felt like a too-long episode

it had a couple of good jokes but a lot more that fell flat, the animation itself wasn't particularly good and the story barely made any sense

Funny how the parody looks less soulless than the original.

It was okay.

So, why was this ok but showing Lisa's coin slot would be worse than Hitler.

Not as good as the show in it's prime but when it came out it was better than the show had been for more than five years.

They showed that in the first episode

it was alright, but the spiderpig shit was awful, especially in every fucking commercial

What are you talking about? That pic looks less rendered than the original. It looks off.

It's fine

Did not age well.
I'd probably watch it again if there's nothing else to do.

>anatomically incorrect crotch
Dude...

because of you
you in particular

She's wearing a body stocking, but the Korean animators fucked up and forgot to color it in.

Here's a question: has anyone ever animated a pussy? The Simpsons made a huge deal about showing a dick in their movie, but I can't imagine them even showing Maggie's pussy, certainly not Marge or Lisa's. Anime has more wangs than San Francisco bathhouse, but the Japs are openly afraid of pussies. I'm not trying to be shocking or start a debate, I'm just curious if it's ever even happened. Pics aren't necessary.

Japan has some weird, nonsensical censorship laws left over from after WWII.

Christfags hate seeing the nude human body. It makes them lust. And that's awful.

It's this universally accepted belief that nudity and sexuality is "indecent" that has created the problems we're dealing with today, with instances such as conservatives on twitter and Tumblr believing that a woman doing a spider pose is immature and sexist.

homar get ipad

Bojack Horseman had like 7 little girl pussies on screen.

It made sense in context.

I dunno, why can't we have nude men too? Probably because a lot of men get really fucking uncomfortable about it.

They'll start jacking off to the female cartoon characters to the point were they shun real females.

The moral guardians are trying to prevent America from turning into a Western Japan that's full of otaku. Those in control of the media are trying to save Western animation by keeping it from going the way of anime, where they have to pander to otaku to make a living.

They're not villains who hate the female body, they're heroes that are trying to preserve the integrity of Western animation.

well not even Lisa's butt its in the show at least Marge its on 25x9

Actually, no. Anime is rather a different stroke of prudish in certain genres.
The insane otaku manchildren dictate what is appropriate for a character.
They have an insane purity standard far worse than what America enforces in that waifufagging dictates how harem characters may or may not act and what kind of characters there can be, personality-wise.

>They have an insane purity standard far worse than what America enforces in that waifufagging dictates how harem characters may or may not act and what kind of characters there can be, personality-wise.
I think that's just pandering.

the fuck kind of question is that? there's plenty of cartoon nudity around.

People just don't want their children jerking off to Saturday Morning cartoons and if you can't understand that I feel very sorry for you.

>The insane otaku manchildren dictate what is appropriate for a character.
>They have an insane purity standard far worse than what America enforces in that waifufagging dictates how harem characters may or may not act and what kind of characters there can be, personality-wise.

You mean when otaku flip their shit when it's even hinted that their waifu may not be pure, but have no problem reading a doujin where said waifu gets split in half by huge demon cock and are destined to spend the rest of eternity drinking demon semen?

That shit never made sense to me.

>People just don't want their children jerking off to Saturday Morning cartoons and if you can't understand that I feel very sorry for you.
Have you seen the movie adaptations of Astrid Lindgren books?
I remember a scene featuring naked men in the snow.

Pippi Longstocking?

Look at yourselves. You're a bunch of unemployed manchildren complaining on an autistic anime-themed website about how there isn't enough nudity in children's cartoons for you to jerk off to, thinking that you're better than all the evil "prudes" out there who've been brainwashed by evil society and religion. You're going on about the most unimportant, irrelevant, autistic bullshit imaginable and acting like it's some deep-rooted evil in modern society. Do you have any idea how retarded this is?

And you have this same thread pretty much every fucking day.

I mean, if you're cool with them appearing in people's hands or on their foreheads, End of Evangelion has vaginas in multiple places, but that's the only one I can think of and its not American cartoons.

>there isn't enough nudity in children's cartoons for you to jerk off to
Nah, there's enough porn for all of us.
I just think nudity shouldn't be a taboo. It's not in Europe.
>And you have this same thread pretty much every fucking day.
Really? I didn't notice.

what i think is weird is it's specifically female stuff
>Bart moons people
ok
>Bart flashes wang in movie
ok

>Lisa moons somebody

Is like showing video of baby seals being clubbed to death in Canada.

I remember watching TV and every commercial break had that fucking Spider Pig commercial while Simpsons was in theaters and when it came on DVD.

But girls are delicate flowers and boys are idiot retards!

Like how many dozens of times was Calvin naked but Susie was shown in a swimsuit like once in C&H's entire run.

oh man. it's 10 years old next year.

damn.

tbf it would be kind of OOC for either Lisa or Susie Derkins to moon people

girls are more easily raped and must be "protected", this is the reason.

Only man butts and little boy penises are ok in cartoons because cartoonists are disgusting perverts.

It was okay. The movie is probably the best Zombie Simpsons is capable of now: not really good, but it has its moments.

The best part was Marge trying to rationalize why she has stuck with Homer, despite his jerkass attitude, and... breaks out of character and admits defeat.

>Marge: Lately. what's keeping us together is my ability to overlook everything you do. And I overlook these things because.... Well. that's the thing. I just don't know how to finish that sentence anymore.

Though they made some really odd decisions, like actually using Schwarzenegger instead of long-established Arnie parody McBain.

Or having Albert Brooks come back, but not as Hank Scorpio, but playing a character who is basically Hank Scorpio.

Julie Kavner's delivery was p. great here, in fact the movie had one of her best performances ever.

Fox fucked the whole thing up to appeal to people who weren't Simpsons fans. Their excuse was that casuals wouldn't know who Rainier Wolfcastle was or Hank Scorpio.

The writers also intended for Milhouse to get his groove on with Lisa, but the Fox suits also nixed that and forced the inane Colin shit on the movie because they thought it was cute and marketable to chicks.

Did you say McBane?

I see belly button tho

Kids used to be seen as just kids back in the day with anime, and so a character under like 7 that was either male or female could be shown frontally nude casually. They used to do it in Gundam series, which had to do with a lot of kids in wartime situations. It was like, well, here they are, they're kids, they get baths. On to the next scene.

Nowadays though, Japan has sexualized little girls to the point that they make young female nudity some added bonus that otaku can unlock if they buy the DVDs or some shit. Meanwhile, there's still no issue with having frontal nudity of young boys (though I wonder how long that will last before they're sexualized to the point of enhanced marketability). It's royally fucked.

I'm actually glad that america never opened up that pandora's box. But it still represents that we're an equally fucked up society but in a different more repressive way.

I thought it was because that was his hand giving the middle finger

>or Hank Scorpio.

So they didn't think people would know a popular character from when the Simpsons was an ubiquitous cultural phenomenon, but they thought a completely new character nobody had ever seen or knew about would draw crowds?

You're making a bigger deal out of this than anyone else ITT.

Nobody ever accused network executives of non-faggotry.

Unfunny trash

You can get treatment for your pedophilia if you want.

Let's put it this way. You're a little kid mindlessly watching cartoons with your mother and all of sudden, you're suddenly greeted by the sight of a fully nude woman.
How do you think your mum will react to this sporadic exposure of sex to her prepubescent child?

They reportedly made her do like 50 takes on one scene until her throat was sore.

Nah, it had some jokes, but it was just mostly mediocre and disjointed. Like they had a few ideas floating around (Homer gets a pig, Springfield gets polluted) and just tossed them together.

>nude female body is always sexual
nice male gaze, there buddy.

I don't believe that to be true, but many Americans believe that nudity equals sex whether it's male or female.

Thanks for the condescending and spiteful comeback, but I don't have pedophilia.

Why are you so angry?

And then, of course, everyone quoting it.

There's a show with equine girls who don't wear clothes.

I just offered some help. You're the one who came back with insults.

Do you know what "projection" means in an emotional context, user?

its ok

Jim Sterling had a video about the same issue in games, his reasoning being that while penises have neutral and lewd states (flaccid and erect), vaginas for the most part have only one state and many cultures default to "that's lewd" rather than "that's normal".

Also dicks are funny looking and can lead to funny situations, vaginas not so much. Anything remotely funny you could do with a vagina you could do better with an anus.

Horses don't count as people.

Really now? Care to elaborate?

Awful movie.

It wasn't bad. It was just dissapointing.
Even as a 12 year old I could tell it was somewhat meh

Women do experience an erection of sorts though. When sexually stimulated, the nipples and clit swell and harden.

You don't need naked people everywhere. Nudity purely for fanservice's sake doesn't really have its place in cartoons that are supposed to be for all ages.

came to mention this pedo, but here he is.

Doraemon had a million nude scenes with both boys and girls but they never showed a pussy. Girls had blank crotches like a Ken doll.

It's not polite to samefag to get more (You)s for your own post.

Fucking Americans, man. They produce the most and the most vile porn of any country on the planet, yet they rise up in outrage over artistic nudity.

>I just offered some help.
So, acting like an accusatory jackass after getting called out is your idea of helping?

>You're the one who came back with insults.
All I literally said was "You're making a bigger deal out of this than anyone else ITT." How was that even the slightest bit insulting?

>Do you know what "projection" means in an emotional context, user?
Yes, I know what it means; but you clearly don't. You're the one who started ranting. You're ironically getting more worked up over "the most unimportant, irrelevant, autistic bullshit imaginable" than anyone else.

>They produce the most and the most vile porn of any country on the planet
Nah, that's Germany.

Standards and Practices.

Archer jokes about fucking all the time and has sex scenes with guy ass and visible thrusting, but bare tits are for some reason still a taboo on every channel.

Having jokes doesn't mean they are funny.

Gravity Falls had a good one.

Sorry that they don't put your fetish in cartoons, faggots.

they didn't show it because Yeardley Smith is a feminist bitch. she won't let them show Lisa naked or being beaten up and abused and she also requires the writers to show Lisa as perfect and correct in every episode.

but it's hardly visible (at least the clitoral hardening) from the same range as a penile erection

>nipples are a fetish
Crawl back into your crypt, Jerry Falwell.

The children, oh god will some please think of the children.

You can't have any nudity on any American TV show.

I don't know of any shows aimed towards children anywhere that have nudity, in a sexual way at least.

Want porn? Check porn on the internet.

A neckbeard wanting nudity in a children cartoon just to jack off is pretty stupid.

I really liked it.

las ratas.

>naked male = HAHAHAHAHA SO FUNNEH
>naked female = FUCKING RAPE RAPE RAPE RAPE RAPE
because retards

Probably the last time a Marge/Homer fight felt believable to me with the videotape she leaves for him

I didn't liked The Simpsons back then because i thought the characters were incredible stupid but even throught i didn't like it i went and watched it. MASSIVE MISTAKE

They've never shown any females from 3-17 naked on the Simpsons and Lisa did get beaten up in Bye Bye Nerdie.

Because when it comes to western animation and comic books, most of the time it's poor. When comics/cartoons do fanservice it tends to be mediocre at best, getting chubs only from desperate nerds. Other times, when the fanservice is decent, animators and character designers tend to shit the bed when it comes to nude anatomy.

Drawn Together was alright with naughty shit until they showed bare breasts.

I remember seeing this and really liking it the first time or two, but looking back at it it's pretty much just an average Simpson episode strung out to fill 2ish hours, definitely not as good as was said, but not as bad as stuff that's come after.