Cowardice: The Movie

Cowardice: The Movie

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=4ztOV2wrrkY
youtube.com/watch?v=5mMiy417aIc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Conscience makes cowards of us all.

*Strategy the Movie

>Strategy

Rely on the German panzers giving the Brits a break, using the frogs as a last ditch defence to save the brave British "men"

Yes it is well known Brits are cowards.

Protip for all the pro-allied wikipedia editors: If one boxer flees from a ring fight/runs away from the boxing ring, it's not a """succesful evacuation".

He just bailed so he wouldn't get beaten the fuck up by his superior opponent.

The only reason Dunkirk didn't turn into the allied Stalingrad was because Hitler himself gave the order for the tanks to stop just before the city so that he could sue for peace, which Churchill the fat drunkard sow cunt of course rejected because he just loved civilians too much (read his WW1 letters, they show him for the masochistis anti-white moron he was).

If you were in their situation, would you do much different?

*he just loved bombing civs too much

Goddamn it's late already

>shoots plane
>teeny tiny smoke trail
>"he's done"

Its not my falut Krautcucks lost the war.

t. mad Germacuck or American who roleplays as a German

...

>where are you guys going? hitler is the other way

Us Americans had to bail those cowards out.

>Let other soldiers die to spare your own

That's a good strategy

>Americans

War was going fine without yous and at least we fight like men without using atom bombs

>when you call yourself the master race but all you do is kill millions of white people and get your shit pushed in by malnourished slavs

What did the G*rmans mean by this?

Wrong.

>it's a yuropean armchair general furious about something that happened almost 80 years ago desperately trying to bait Brits episode

Yeah at least the bongs were smart enough to know when to retreat unlike Adolf "let my 6th army get annihilated by the red army" Hitler

>The only reason Dunkirk didn't turn into the allied Stalingrad was because Hitler himself gave the order for the tanks to stop just before the city so that he could sue for peace.

Or you know, they overstretched and had no supplies, a lot of tanks were knocked out of action by the French and were awaiting repairs and the terrain around Dunkirk was terrible for mechanised infantry without heavy losses so it was easier to just mow them down on the beach with planes.

Nice meme history though, Hitler was a gud boi who din du nuffin. If you're trying for peace you don't fucking blow up evacuation ships and do bombing runs up and down a beach full of men. Kill yourself Sup Forums you loser.

funny twitter meme! how do i share on this site?

Anglos are the master race we won both world wars, colonised the whole world, leaving the EU whlie cuckmany dies, most spoken language in the west, Anglo culture is everywhere, higher average IQ, made a military decision so smart Krautcucks and chinks will never understand,

Meanwhile hrr drrr Blond hair
Hurr durr Vikings

>we won both world wars
>we

America

learn history faggot. german strategy called for two pincer spearheads to break through a line, then use tanks to rapidly rush through enemy territory and create chaos and confusion everywhere.

had the allies not retreated, they would have been surrounded and destroyed (the germans called this type of massacre a 'kesselschlacht'). the germans did this in russia as well, winning the largest encirclement battles in human history, capturing hundreds of thousands of soldiers in one big sweep.

the russians were initially retarded just like OP (HURR NO RETREAT WE'RE NOT COWARDS), but after getting their little assholes pounded by hitler over and over stalin decided that maybe it's a better idea to retreat all those men and their equipment to better locations so that they can be used in a counter attack.

>WW1
>America worth mentioning

You've been playing too much Battlefield 1. Just be happy with your country's contribution in WW2, we are very grateful for that.

And who was America founded by? and was the majorty up untill post WW2 german migration?

>my country found your country

Kek

What an irrelevant argument, whats stopping a middle eastern fuckboi using it on your country

Why am I not surprised a Brit would rely on we wuz arguments

I'm Australian cunt

>big guy crashing small planes for you the movie

Bravo N'Olan

Even worse

Have some self respect then or are you actually a proud member of the Commonwealth?

And also the post WW2 german migration is when America started to go down hill so yh you are bascily niggers

Its not my fault you are living in an anglo owned naitoin and you need to go back

A reminder that overestimation of one's strategy and a refusal to order tactical retreats meant 246,000 German men from the 6th Army were killed, wounded and captured by the Soviets and only 5,000 actually returned to Germany after the war ended.

Though 2bh, they probably deserved it for Babi Yar.

America has only existed as a country for a mere 3 or 4 generations, that's hardly the same as the blacks calling themselves pharaohs

the thing that pisses me off the most about Hitler (and I do think he was a pretty admirable fellow) is how when things failed and fell apart in the end it was everybody else's fault. As far as records from history have shown us, Hitler never took any kind of responsibility for giving dumb orders or anything like that. Like, it wasn't Hitler's fault for giving out retarded orders it was his Generals fault for not being able to follow his retarded orders to completion. You know, as opposed to, letting his Generals be in charge of the military strategies & trust their judgment like he goddamn well should have.

>actually lives in an Anglo owned country
>claims the US is

The outback sun must have made you delirious Bruce because you're talking shit

That's the difference between the british and american spirit for you, americans simply can't understand why would someone make a film about their country not being the absolute heroic brave winner, they can't fathom why would Nolan portray the brit soldiers as actual human beings trying to survive because they are so used to seeing every soldier being a morally stable extremely heroic literal saint

Americunts can only understand movies where men are cowardly running into battle instead of bravely running away to fight another day.

>mfw they call the french guy a coward

Bait: The Post

I would accept that if the film didn't portray them as brave in the end

But it didn't? It only portayed how there is something to praise in a succesful retreat.
The only one who was really portrayed as brave was Tom Hardy.

eurocucks are cucks and cowards. their women and kids are being killed and they do nothing. good job voting for macron and merkel again. I have no pity left for you.

Goering told him the luftwaffe would be able to deal with the retreat, which would have been a great propaganda victory due to the fact that of all branches, the air force was the most ideologically committed to the nazi cause.

Meanwhile, adverse terrain and breakdowns forced the armored forces to a halt. Rommel, master of outrunning his own supply lines, couldn't have gone further if we wanted (unless he wanted his tanks getting cut off without resupply and possibly enveloped). I don't recall the exact number, but I recall it being between 50%-70% of German tanks being not battle-ready at this point. Maintenance and reliability plagued the German armor throughout the war.

Why aren't more people red pilled? They teach ww2 in school, you're told half of the civilized world wanted to kill the Jews but you're never told why. Why don't the kids wonder why they get so much hate and if perhaps they don't deserve some of it? Then you're told it would have been awful if Germany had colonized the rest of Europe, but now Europe is basically an American and Israeli colony, with an extra layer of Islamic shit, but if you complain about it you're wrong. Why are educators so fucking retarded and or dishonest?

youtube.com/watch?v=4ztOV2wrrkY

it was also the german people's fault. In the end he hated them an wanted them racially eliminated and hoped that the russians would exterminate them.

If it weren't for you damn yanks we could've kept the war going for another 10 years!

What always amuses me is he criticized German leadership for this exact same thing after WWI.

>literally not a single German soldier is seen until the last 30 seconds of the film

Tbqh I liked this quite a lot, accurately depicted the vastly more important role that effective naval tech, air supremacy, and artillery plays in modern war compared to infantry.

Only brainlets would dispute that this was at the very least a good movie, and easily Nolan's best.

What the fuck is honorable about getting shelled by artillery or getting gunned down in a strafing run?

>eurocucks are cucks

Hello Sup Forums, friendly reminder that children in the US are majority non-white and you are the largest consumer and producer of cuckold porn :)

this movie was emotional cardboard

technically the movie is very well made, but the characters' emotions just felt so sterile and acted out. I didnt give a shit about any of them.

>Christopher Nolan outright admits he hates telling stories from characters' perspectives
>outright admits he loves the "scale" and set pieces more than character or story
>can't write dialogue that isn't hamfisted exposition
>his interpretation of "Love" is just "Yeah these people feel love and it's great" instead of "This person's insecurities/desires/lusts/shortcomings draw them to people who fulfill these needs in their heart and love is a flawed, bizarre subjective monster that's almost magical"
>he shits on digital and insists on film-only when his visual style is terrible, barely above television-tier, with no real use of dramatic lighting, camera angles or using the aesthetic to convey emotion or narrative
>insisted on dehumanizing and anonymizing the people in Dunkirk by having the Germans literally named "The enemy"
>obsessed with dread and death and misery but shies away from blood and guts and true horrors of war
>but he's okay-tier and uses muh practicals which is better than 90% of current blockbuster directors so pseuds and "film buffs" love him
>compares himself to actual auteurs like Lang, Griffith, Malick, Kurosawa while not even being better than Roland Emmerich

When Rylance yelled at his son that maybe the downed pilot is alive I felt tears forming from just that single line, especially in the context of his character.
Rylance is truly one of the greats, absolutely zero I'M ACTING.

>>Christopher Nolan outright admits he hates telling stories from characters' perspectives
Citation needed. Also your point makes zero sense because Dunkirk is told from three different extremely subjective character perspectives interconnected with oneanother
>>outright admits he loves the "scale" and set pieces more than character or story
Citation needed. The only thing he said is that he doesn't want the movie to be heavily character driven, but he is not retarded to say that story is not important.
>>can't write dialogue that isn't hamfisted exposition
But Dunkirk has zero hamfisted exposition?
>>he shits on digital and insists on film-only when his visual style is terrible, barely above television-tier, with no real use of dramatic lighting, camera angles or using the aesthetic to convey emotion or narrative
This is an absolutely braindead retarded argument. First of all, not all of his films are made by the same cinematographer. And you clearly know jackshit about camera operating and visual storytelling so you resort to bullshit arguments like "no real use of dramatic lighting". The entire first 30 minutes are pure visual storytelling and using the visual medium like it should be used, you can pretend that it's "television tier" and that the heavily claustrophobic drowning shots are not showing anything, but you're just living in denial
>>insisted on dehumanizing and anonymizing the people in Dunkirk by having the Germans literally named "The enemy"
And what's bad about that? Not showing them was one of the best decisions Nolan could've made. The entire film is told exclusively from the british soldiers perspective, and we as the audience, just like those soldiers on the beach, don't see a single german soldier up close. Listen to the actual Churchill speeches on youtube, he called them "the enemy" most of the times.
Is a "le evil nazi screaming german" close up really that necessary for you? Do you want the usual hollywood nazi propaganda?

i was more distracted by the fact that his son looks old enough to be in the actual war

most overrated movie of 2017

We still beat you, fritz
t. Frog

youtube.com/watch?v=5mMiy417aIc

I liked that part too. His sudden outburst was convincing enough already, when the revelation came later it all fell into place

He probably was, but the war had only just started recently and there wasn't mass conscription yet.

>Shoots plane
>Epic HUGE explosion!
>Theater stands up and claps

The frogs saved you

Show some respect

I've never fought once in my life: The Virgin.

"Brave" Britishman detected

American actually.

Still haven't seen this. Is it worth it or just typical Nolan hype like Inception and Interstellar?

Ah the kings of cowardice then

Ride in at the last second and act like you won the wars

Funny that the only one you took on solo you got your ass handed to yours by a bunch of jungle nips

It's without question one of the best cinema experiences of recent times.
If you still can go see it in theaters, watching it on your computer/TV is almost pointless

Insecure countrylet.

I didn't really hate them or racially wanted them exterminated, he hated pretty much the "traitors" that led to his downfall and wanted the German race to get wiped out as soon as possible as not to suffer too much after

HE************************

a great "cinema viewing" experience somewhat marred by Nolan's inability to show some restraint when it comes to hamfisted emotional scenes

This.Same shit happened with Kursk first when pressing for the battle itself and then ordering a cancellation when Manstein was already balls deep.Did the same bullshit with redirecting Paulus to Stalingrad.

Wasn't Hitler like bad at war strategy, but kept doing things his advisers told him not to do

>thread is full of furious Jerries

Not necessarily

Just arrogant

History PhD here, these are the only worthwhile posts from someone who read more than one history book ITT