Too bad we didn't see Joker in Nolan movies, and Anarky was shit

Too bad we didn't see Joker in Nolan movies, and Anarky was shit

HUNKA HUNKA

...

...

What were they thinkig going from the best
(live action) portrayal of the Joker to the fucking worst? It would have been so easy to just go with an easy Nicholson-style Joker for SS but they went fucking batshit instead. What on earth motivated them to do such a thing?

Romero is best, newbie

Stupid memes aside.

Imagine an animated sitcom with all the live action Jokers living together on Gothan.

Too Many Jokers?

You mean Gorshin, casual pretending to be patrician.

Wtf, Gorshin is best Riddler, not Joker.

What I'm fairly sure he was getting at is that Gorshin would have made a fantastic Joker, certainly better than Romero who I don't really like. Gotta be the only '66 villain that I feel is done better elsewhere.

>people defended this when it came out

Who? Who defended this? Because I don't recall anyone defending this shit.

Literally NO ONE defended this. Thankfully we have the archives to prove this.

Heath Ledger is an unfunny edgelord
Leto is just fucking disgusting

PLEASE DC JUST MAKE A MOVIE WITH MARK HAMILL'S JOKER

Sounds like a joke Brave and the Bold would have eventually done.

Nobody defended it, all of the time it was making fun of it actually.

>Heath Ledger is an unfunny edgelord
Wrong, he had some great joeks

No one defended it, the closest it came was a bunch of people saying "No, that's obviously not what he's gonna look like in the movie. This is just a promo image for Joker's 75th"

like?

>I'm going to start a thread by implying a unanimously praised portrayal is actually bad

shit b8