Too bad we didn't see Joker in Nolan movies, and Anarky was shit
Too bad we didn't see Joker in Nolan movies, and Anarky was shit
HUNKA HUNKA
...
...
What were they thinkig going from the best
(live action) portrayal of the Joker to the fucking worst? It would have been so easy to just go with an easy Nicholson-style Joker for SS but they went fucking batshit instead. What on earth motivated them to do such a thing?
Romero is best, newbie
Stupid memes aside.
Imagine an animated sitcom with all the live action Jokers living together on Gothan.
Too Many Jokers?
You mean Gorshin, casual pretending to be patrician.
Wtf, Gorshin is best Riddler, not Joker.
What I'm fairly sure he was getting at is that Gorshin would have made a fantastic Joker, certainly better than Romero who I don't really like. Gotta be the only '66 villain that I feel is done better elsewhere.
>people defended this when it came out
Who? Who defended this? Because I don't recall anyone defending this shit.
Literally NO ONE defended this. Thankfully we have the archives to prove this.
Heath Ledger is an unfunny edgelord
Leto is just fucking disgusting
PLEASE DC JUST MAKE A MOVIE WITH MARK HAMILL'S JOKER
Sounds like a joke Brave and the Bold would have eventually done.
Nobody defended it, all of the time it was making fun of it actually.
>Heath Ledger is an unfunny edgelord
Wrong, he had some great joeks
No one defended it, the closest it came was a bunch of people saying "No, that's obviously not what he's gonna look like in the movie. This is just a promo image for Joker's 75th"
like?
>I'm going to start a thread by implying a unanimously praised portrayal is actually bad
shit b8