Would the European Union nations win a war against the USA ?

Just wondering

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=s-q-ximLowI
youtube.com/watch?v=Khaa3y0i87s
navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=18841
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

no

No, but we welcome the challenge.

no

Hahaha no

No

...

WOW TITS

you can't even win a war against canada retard.

The EU has Italy on their side.

not even close

No

The only thing we're winning against the US is seeing who's getting outbred by niggers first, but even that's pretty close

No.

The only real army the EU has now that we've left is the French Army. So no

The UK and America would never fight each other because we are real allies, but hypothetically no. Also only France and UK have real troops

Until they switch sides.

Europe would be rekt so hard they'd ask for asylum in Somalia

It would take the entire world combined to match the US navy and US airforce. And we would still win with the nuclear option.

with those tits, maybe.

...

>Putin's daughter
Holy moly! Doujins with Ivanka when?

>mfw we would win anyway.

The EU is falling apart from within and the mudlims aren't even trying and they are fucking you up so there would be no chance against the US or Russia.

Dear god no, but I like to think we would give a good account of ourselves for a couple of weeks.

Probably wouldn't win a war against the US. It would probably be pretty difficult to win a war against a nation like that in general, it doesn't matter who you are.

... No

Given enough time for germany to rearm: yes by a landslide.

the US has been kicking muslim ass for decades though

>if you help your enemies, you win

we literally are their army, they just offer some minor support forces

The size of them titties though.

We Holland alone would beat you guys

>putin's daughter
No way. Seriously?

In the end it all comes down to the industrial infrastructure. Europe is way too divided for such and effort, but theoretically we are stronger as a whole.

This is exactly what I heard in my head right after reading OP

...

Bukkake anyone?

>germany to rearm

kek Germanistan rearming thats a good one

The EU doesn't have the resources for war but America does. America's population is around 100 million less (not including the UK) but it is much younger. American technology is better.

Looks like America is the best

Is that really Putin's daughter?

Found the eurocuck who doesnt know wtf hes talking about.

Meh, drones and fancy rations only get you so far.
Europe would have the man advantage.

Spending more money on something doesn't necessarily mean that it is better.

lol

Too cucked to win a battle let alone a war.

>man advantage
We all know the war would be fought on European soil.

And we win by default in that scenario.

haha yes because of nukes

the nuclear fallout would empty the US in a few months.
فرنسا هي واحدة من "الدول الأسلحة النووية" خمسة بموجب معاهدة منع انتشار الأسلحة النووية، ولكن من غير المعروف لامتلاك أو تطوير أي weapons.France البيولوجية الكيميائية أو كان رابع دولة لاختبار سلاح نووي تطويرها بشكل مستقل في عام 1960، تحت حكومة شارل ديغول. ويعتقد أن الجيش الفرنسي حاليا الإبقاء على مخزون الأسلحة نحو 300 رأس نووي التشغيلية، مما يجعل من شروط الثالثة والأكبر في العالم، وتتحدث في الرؤوس الحربية، وليس ميغاطن. الأسلحة هي جزء من وطني القوة دي فرابي، وضعت في أواخر 1950s و 1960s لإعطاء فرنسا القدرة على تنأى بنفسها عن حلف شمال الاطلسي في حين وجود وسيلة ل


France is one of the five "Nuclear Weapons States" under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, but is not known to possess or develop any chemical or biological weapons.France was the fourth country to test an independently developed nuclear weapon in 1960, under the government of Charles de Gaulle. The French military is currently thought to retain a weapons stockpile of around 300 operational nuclear warheads, making it the third-largest in the world, speaking in terms of warheads, not megatons. The weapons are part of the national Force de frappe, developed in the late 1950s and 1960s to give France the ability to distance itself from NATO while having a means of nuclear deterrence under sovereign control.

France did not sign the Partial Test Ban Treaty, which gave it the option to conduct further nuclear tests until it signed and ratified the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in 1996 and 1998 respectively. France denies currently having chemical weapons, ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) in 1995, and acceded to the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BWC) in 1984. France had also ratified the Geneva Protocol in 1926.

Isn't russia's nuclear program more advanced than that of the US?

Not entirely sure where i got that from though.

No, because the conflict would inevitably go nuclear, and nobody would win that.

We should deploy all of our niggers to the EU and the war would be over in a couple of weeks.

Problem is the US has a big headstart so even if Europe were to overtake the US in R&D as well as manufacturing it would take a long time to catch up to what the US already has

Oh yes. Burger-Slav union needs to happen, so we can get big tittied bimbos in the news at all times.

Lol.

How much did Vietnam spent?

If Russia joins Europe then yes otherwise no.

You couldn't even beat a bunch of hueniggers Van Basten.

a- lepo

That would be a stalemate though

The EU would be drowning in arab/niggercock and the US would be empty

Absolutely not.

If the unified EU would could arm itself and prepare for 10 years, without USA increasing their budget and preparing then maybe, but still would be tough fight

we have the manpower and the knowhow, the only problem is we wouldnt be able to ramp up weapons production before the us steamrolls us.

I wonder if Putin knows internet shitposters like me would like to marry his daughter

To even ask "would X win against USA" shows one's ignorance about the current state of affairs

USA is so much ahead of everyone else in military tech that even to ask that question makes you sound dumb

The ONLY sensible question would be : would USA win VS the whole rest of the world combined ?

Everything else is a given

Why did you feel the need to translate it to arabic?

>all these yuropoors saying no

that's right cucks, worship your master

>muh shekels

it only works on greedy people like judas. oh boy...

The EU couldn't beat Texas, let alone the entire US. Not to mention the fact that we have more military bases and soldiers in Europe than the EU does, it's a no brainer.

Guarantee these little sluts are looking for a nigger rite now

>Trump becomes president
>Ivanka - Yekaterina lexbo sex tape surfaces
>World peace issues

Doesn't the US still have nukes on german soil that fuck them up?

especially when you take into account how ready each countries soldiers would care, EU soldiers would desert... uncaring about what happens to their lost heritage, while americans will fight for their ideals

No they would still lose.

You might have a shot, if you are Trump junior. Otherwise highly unlikely.

If they were willing to fight, spent 20 years having 4+ birthrate, and gassed all muslims, then maybe

But the yuros are too big of cucks to do any of that, so they would never even fight in the first place, let alone win

In fact, if America invaded the EU tomorrow it is likely that the only resistance we would face would be jihadis

>eurofags dont even realize a huge part of US military budget is stationing troops and weapons in the countries of our allies
>if that budget were used solely for ourselves and offensive/defensive capability it would be a shit show

One of his daughters married a Dutch guy and the second one married a Korean

Hahahahaha

This. You know what's up.

kek. pretty acurate.

I'd invade her European Union.

>yfw european leftists send their muslim immigrants on suicide missions

Don't fucking say that.

At this stage, we can't. We don't need a superhuge military like the US does.

The US needs a superhuge army.

>european union

If we had a common army? Yes. We would have superior manpower and firepower if we started spending. But it would end up in a nuclear war and nobody would win in the end.

That's fine, we have a bomb advantage, tank advantage, fighting expirence advantage, naval advantage, air superiority advantage, recon advantage, sniper advantage ect. You having more men is just more targets. More chances for the us to try out cool new killing toys
TLDR Man power doesn't win war, firepower does faggot

EU would be obliterated but we would win.

Top kek

No.
The US has a far superior navy meaning it has far superior force projection than Europe could ever hope to achieve, even working together.
Plus, the US is one nation, not a comglomeration of nations squabbling over who gets to be in charge of what.

Look who's talking!

>putin's daughter

>user's don't know about the secret bastard child

And then there are countries like UK or us.

UK would just become unsinkable carrier for you again (and UK has not enacted article 50 yet, so they are still in EU)
We would just bitch that this shit does not make sense, we need to take care of those pesky ruskies and would either opt out to fortify our borders in case they try to do something or just switch sides after you guarantee us protection from the homo-sovieticus.

This is stupidly impossible to comprehend.
The thing is EU is by no way a single country, and most states do not want to federate despite what german and bruxelian shills tell.

youtube.com/watch?v=s-q-ximLowI

>Why did you feel the need to translate it to arabic?

because i want see your IP connectet with arabian letters.

Fuck off bigot, german comes in many forms. Just because you use latin letters doesn't mean you're talkin latin, does it?
Checkmate nationalists

Russia has more nukes and their nukes tend to have larger yields. Our nukes as a whole would be more advanced though. Basically, our entire delivery system from missiles to subs to re-entry vehicles are more capable, better maintained and better funded.

It depends. On their own, no.

If Russia helped, probably.

Italy has three stages of military preparedness
>elaborate military posturing
>lose
>switch sides

>In fact, if America invaded the EU tomorrow it is likely that the only resistance we would face would be jihadis


>US invades
>we become US citizens
>2nd amendment applies
>I can now shoot guns, eat cheap delicious burgers and drive around in a 70 liter V8 truck while the gas price is a fraction of today's

why would i fight this

Europe needs to stop with their lib shit before we gas them when the god emperor wins.

Eastern europe will be spared because they're getting their shit together and they don't bad mouth conservatives

it dependes where it takes place.
american soldiers are garbage. if they don't have access to internet and mcdonalds they'll surrender after a few days.

No.

They'd lose between 1 to 4 carriers groupes to the French navy, then would have a fun time rolling over all these useless leeches that cant maintain a military to save their life. The only exception, Poland, would only be a pain in the ass at the end, too isolated to do anything.

>internet and McDonald's everywhere
We are fucked.

Germany has spent the last 70 years destroying the martial spirit of their citizens. Thogh they've imported enough Snackbars that they might rally them with promise of a new Caliphate in Europe.

Not really "win", but not lose either. Stalemate.

>nukes
Russia would be a european ally. The only reason we're "against" russia is because of the zionist regime in the US. So for that reason, no nukes. The US would lose any nuclear exchange against russia alone, and we have more nations than that with nukes and long-range bombers.

>Countries never increase their military spending during wartime
The US is at a near war-level military spending already, but the european countries would all ramp their spending up individually to massively outpace the american one. Submarine warfare would completely isolate the US. An actual invasion would be too difficult to try, but locking the oceans down would be entirely possible. The americans could only impotently rage until some agreement was signed.

>muh carriers
Threadly reminder that even Sweden has the technology to take down american carriers and nuclear subs.

youtube.com/watch?v=Khaa3y0i87s
Yes, with active sonar used: navy.mil/submit/display.asp?story_id=18841