Protagonist is female

>protagonist is female

>protagonist is a black female

Most female hero characters sucks for one main reason . Unlike male heroes who are selfless and fight for justice, the female hero is a sellfish and entitled cunt who does whatever she wants to obtain whatever she needs. There is no justice, she's always right and never wrong. That's how they make them at Hollywood. Yass queen

>protagonist is neither male or female

Why is he turning on the tv

...

The Boy is one of the worst examples. The whole story changes halfway into it just so they can create a scenario where the men are all bad and the girl is able to "prove herself" by besting them.

No they suck because it's sexist to not make them a 200 IQ mary sue with the strength of 10 men

>protagonist is a gay black female

...

>protagonist is a white male

Lola Rennt was absolute kino. That's all I guess

>protagonist is a black female with a male name

>everyone quips like the protagonist

He’s turning it off you mong

>""""movie"""" has a protagonist

>whatever she wants to obtain whatever she needs
>desire
> a bad thing

>protagonist is a normie

>protagonist is considered a reclusive weirdo because he only has sex once a week

no it's because they want to make the badass male stereotype in a woman's body.

>kitchen is inside the house

It's not a bad thing as long as you're not stepping over someone else freedom. And that, the female hero doesn't aknowledge.

That's just realistic female behavior though

>protagonist is a woman
>in an action movie
>who's 100 lbs soaking wet
>and goes around beating up massive henchmen by the dozens
>while doing stupid "grab his head with my thighs" moves

>protagonist starts telling the story of his unfortunate pre-credits circumstances via flashbacks.

Even that can work with the correct approach. Superhuman characters are often so because they exist in an elevated reality that ultimately illustrates a point that applies to the real world. Fables and myths reflect beliefs, reality, and culture. One common problem is a superhuman character with no symbolic value or else one that symbolizes values that one either disagrees with or perhaps worse than that: inauthentic values.

Male heroes commonly get away with being overly competent because they still draw from masculine ideals. Female heroes don't often get away with the same things because they don't ring true one way or another.

>she doesnt get her tits out

Fucking this. I don't actually have a problem with female leads, so long as they're ACTUALLY presented as women, rather than just being written as men, but with tits.

James Cameron did a great doing the female action lead in Aliens and the Terminator movies. Why? Because they weren't just "male role but we decided to cast a woman and change some pronouns in the script". Their characters actually emphasized their womanly/maternal aspects. Ripley was mama bear caring for and going back to protect her surrogate daughter. Sarah Connor was an innocent and uncharismatic woman who learned how to get tough. And in the second movie, her obsession with trying to be tough and prepare for the future caused rifts in her family life, had her son taken away, and locked in the loony bin, but after she gets out, she's still acting as a mother protecting her child.

These female leads are good because they embrace being a woman and make it integral to the character, rather than just treating the character as this bland 2D cardboard cutout where it doesn't matter what the gender is.

TOP KEK

This.

>protagonist is a pansexual genderfluid LGBBQTTW white male feminist and POC ally

This is the dumbest comment I've read on this board. This is both Sjw and anti Sjw at the same time.

>unironically calling people sjw
you forgot to donate your good boy points to sargon this month?