So from what the negative reviews are saying:

So from what the negative reviews are saying:

>it's too slow
>there's too many product placements
>it's not diverse enough
>even though the acting is good it's too stylish

I can gather critics are dumbshits and know nothing, right?

Other urls found in this thread:

yomyomf.com/anyone-else-bothered-by-how-white-blade-runner-2049-looks/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>>it's not diverse enough
proofs there's a review saying this?

cant particularly complain about product placement in braderunner desu

all that greentext
are they trying to describe blade runner without noticing?

>yomyomf.com/anyone-else-bothered-by-how-white-blade-runner-2049-looks/

Seen a few positive reviews saying it's good but "HURR TOO WHITEY NOT ENOUGH DIVERSITY" despite Bautista, Lennie James, Ana de Armas, Barkhad Abdi and some others being in the movie

>they don't know about the Blade Runner curse

That's what I don't get, it's literally got the same amount of pacing, style and performance that the original had, but they seem to hate it for some reason...

Product placement in Blade Runner is almost a denunciation rather than advertisement.

But seeing that in bladerunner made me drink coca cola.

>Diversity is considered vital to moviemaking
What a meme.
I'd never want to sacrifice realism or quality for diversity.
Pick the best person for the role, not for their skincolour.

>I can gather critics are dumbshits and know nothing, right?
But we already knew that, user.

>You Offend Me You Offend My Family
Who?

most of the "critics" on RT are just youtube/buzzfeed bloggers

It's amazing how this movie doesn't pander to the SJWs and is going really well, but the fucking travesties we've had lately with all the black washing are drowning in terrible reviews.

How's the soundtracks? I don't wanna read the reviews yet

...

>it's not diverse enough
>a society built on literal slavery is overwhelmingly white

it's almost like our boy denis was trying to say something and these retards let it fly right over their heads.

>>it's not diverse enough
how this is negative?
finally movie that isn't putting nugoz or chinks just coz just... finally someone got bals to don't give a crap about SJW.

you can listen to it on youtube

knockoff vangelis

NOT ENOUGH SPICS AND NIGGERS ARRRRRRRRRRRGH

>95%
>CRITICS ARE DUMBSHITS WTF WHY ARE THEY HATING /OURMOVIE/????

Only on Sup Forums could an overwhelmingly positive RT score still be something to cry about. Like you just had to look for something to prove it's still the worst site ever even when it conforms with your view on a movie you haven't seen yet.

Looks like kino is back on the menu.

So the score is lower than Dunkirk. Nolan is still top dog.

D U D E I T I S L I T E R A L L Y 2 0 1 7

>it's literally got the same amount of pacing, style and performance that the original
>The original hated by critics and audiences on release

What the Fuck are people in this thread talking about? It's a fucking 95/100 that's an incredibly high score. People are complaining that people whined about it not being diverse but literally who has said that.

Literally a few clickbait articles. But that's worth our attention more than the 95% rating. Because priorities.

>it's too slow
>there's too many product placements in a fucking BLADE RUNNER film of all things, it's as if all those millenial libshit nu-male cucklets who always own the newest iShit phone have never seen the original
>it's not diverse enough
>even though the acting is good it's too stylish

Those are all positives in my book. I was skeptical as fuck about this movie because I love the original so much, but now I'm hype and can't wait to see it.

even Armond will like it
calling it now

shutup faggot lmao

Bautista is white passing at times so lefties don't count him

rofl

Shut up spic.

Top kek

>It's too slow

Have these dipshits seen the first Blade Runner?

De Armas was one of the best parts of the movie, easily the most interesting character which suprised me

Blade runner for the capeshit adult children
Of you praise this flick you're a reddit

Armond hates Ridley but loves Denis. I'm guessing he'll be super conflicted on this one. I don't think he cared too much for the original

Do you know how to speak English?

Mass replies should be flogged in a public square.

>too slow
>too stylish
is this a Refn film? I'm going to fucking love this

Sup Forums's bots are starting to cave in from the unfathomable result that a Blade Runner sequel might be good

(You)

> Slow

Just like the original Bladerunner. Slow pacing can be good if the film uses that slow pace to explore characters.

> Product placement

Just like the original. It's at least used to connect the film's world to ours.

> Not diverse enough

The film is telling a story, it's not there to promote agendas.

I need to know the truth:
Is Blade Runner 2045 good? Because if not, then this is truly the darkest timeline.

"Diversity" is code for "Black" most of the time.

I've heard some journos call Black Panther a "diverse" movie, when it's pretty much all-black.

Diverse means lots of different things, not lots of the same thing.

I'm looking forward to Black Panther, but it ain't diverse.

The original is grossly overrated not a bad film but overrated.
The new one was over hyped and exists purely to cash in on the originals nostalgia.
I'll wait on a 1080p copy and put it on for noise

Hey. What is the definitive, real version of the original Blade Runner?

I have a fucking MA in film and I've never seen it.

>>it's too slow
that's not something bad
>>there's too many product placements
it's sci-fi, there always is because it's believable
>>it's not diverse enough
fuck you
>>even though the acting is good it's too stylish
fuck you

>>it's not diverse enough
Support this movie. I'll be there tomorrow.