THE END OF THE INTERNET

cruz.senate.gov/internetcountdownclock/

LESS THAN 3 WEEKS UNTIL THEY SHUT DOWN Sup Forums AND THE ONLY GUY STANDING UP FOR US IS FUCKING TED CRUZ

Wtf I guess I'm actually a #CruzMissile now?

Other urls found in this thread:

congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/3034/text
fusion.net/story/343533/who-controls-the-internet/
youtube.com/watch?v=jifpvrGD_UA
youtube.com/watch?v=zMGZtkMS3sQ
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

...

emailcongress.us

I have already done what I can. You should too.

> DNS = internet.
wew lad, that's embarassing, you should educate yourself

cunt shut the fuck up you have no idea how this works

read up on what icann actually does and how the internet is structured

GOOD LUCK TYPING IN A URL WHEN (((THEY))) ARE THE GATEKEEPERS AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT DOES NOT APPLY

icann wants this transition and they have insisted on no governmental regulation, fuck read ted cruz's proposed, its wants the U.S. Goverment to directly take control of the root zone DNCS

here ya go read his proposed bill
congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/3034/text

Just use ips bro

>give away the internet

Reminds me of that episode in South Park

the way it has been they had to follow government regulations

>JUST GET NO TRAFFIC BRO
>JUST GO INSIDE YOUR CLOSET AND TALK WITH YOURSELF BRO

YOU SOUND DUMB AS SHIT.. DNS IS EVERYTHING. TRY RUNNING A WEB SERVER WITH MULTIPLE WEBSITES WITHOUT DNS.

127.0.0.1

this is your home now

Would've been a great president. But no you guys wanted to have a New York liberal leading the fight for your country. You reap what you sow.

>ITS NOT CENSORSHIP

>WERE JUST MAKING IT EXTREMELY DIFFICULT FOR OTHER PEOPLE TO HEAR WHAT YOU SAY

Why isn't Rand Paul filibustering this?

amazing how now one cares about the internet being totally destroyed, all they wanna talk about is hillarys body double. you all been played, like a fiddle.
dumb faggots. you deserve every thing you get.

Unless they're planning on suspending the First Amendment (which they aren't), they will not be shutting down Sup Forums.

>Not having ur own dns cache

> transfer of internet from insane nsa retards to independent international body is equal to shutting down Sup Forums
El Ratto is making up shit as always, nothing to see there.

because it gives active ownership of the Root Zone DNS to the U.S. Government.

here read it
congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/3034/text

Nice.

that's the thing once it goes to the (((UN))) they don't have to follow the constitution. International treaties are their favorite way to circumvent following US law.

el rato is still acting like a rat.

>Unless they're planning on suspending the First Amendment (which they aren't)

>(which they aren't)

>international body
>won't have to answer to the constitution
>no right to freedom of speech
>no right to freedom of press
you really like the way the UN conducts business and want them to extend that to the internet?

>believes the NSA boogeyman
oh yeah, because the NSA has really changed your life so much, faggot.

THE UNITED STATES WILL NO LONGER BE IN CONTROL OF THE DNS(internet)

THE FIRST AMENDMENT DOESNT APPLY OUTSIDE THE US

IF THE US DOES NOT HAVE COMPLETE CONTROL THEN THE FIRST AMENDMENT DOES NOT APPLY

ANY WEBSITE CAN BE SHUTDOWN BY A UN DECLARATION OF "illegal hatespeech"

Educate yourself on peer-to-peer websites incase they fuck around with some nazi ass World Thought Police UN agency.

>only caring about yourself AND NOT YOUR AUDIENCE THAT CAN NO LONGER ACCESS WHAT YOU POST

It is

>trusting globalists over the bill of rights

REEEEETARDED

the U.S. were never in control of the internet in the first place.
ICANN is.

Can't you just type in the IP?

Its going to be great.

It will backfire on the left too, they cant call me names and etc.

who was in control of ICANN?
oh yeah, The US.

Who will be in control of ICANN?
a faceless international body without written laws or guarantees to the public

hmmm certainly nothing to be concerned about

if the guy standing up for us is fucking ted cruz i want no part in this.

Don't you have enough numbers to remember already?

>a Canadian standing up for freedom

Americans are too cucked so we always have to step up for them.

no ICANN wants this transition, and they don't want goverment regulation either.
fusion.net/story/343533/who-controls-the-internet/

You can
Also you can just use another dns server or something

The problem with p2p on zeronet is not only is it insecure, but the fact that you can unknowingly distribute illegal shit

Tumbler the left wing hate site will be removed.

I cant see Russia, China, Muslim countries wanting that on the net.

Can't wait for clean net with no pedos or degenerates.

It will backfire on the left.

Give that man some delegates

If someone links you to an article, and it's just an IP, are you going to trust clicking on it?

FALSE

TED CRUZ IS A MOLE FOR THE BIG SILICON VALLEY CORPORATIONS

HE IS NOT DOING WHAT HE'S DOING IN THE INTEREST OF A FREE AND OPEN INTERNET

HE'S MANIPULATING FOR MORE CONTROL FOR FACEBOOK/GOOGLE/TWITTER

THOSE ARE HIS DONORS

CRUZ IS SCUM

CRUZ IS SLEAZE

DO NOT GET TAKEN IN AGAIN BY THIS MAN

This man speaks the truth. I've started multiple threads on this but the fags here think they know everything. Good luck in a few months when Sup Forums is removed from the root dns because the UN considers this hate speech. You fucking idiots.

>Would've been a great president. But no you guys wanted to have a New York liberal leading the fight for your country. You reap what you sow.
This. Trump is full of hot air, he isn't talking about this AT ALL.

>>Not having ur own dns cache
>hurrrrr let's preach to the choir

>trust me goyim

Neither party cares about the net.

But you can't denie the net is left wing baised.

>fusion

No, this was pretty much debunked by based Ghost on Friday 9. (even though he had been fearmongering about it in every show for the previous weeks.

Watch from 30:07

youtube.com/watch?v=jifpvrGD_UA

As you all know, Ghost is 100% legit and the prognosticator of prognosticators.

El Rato is behind all of this. DEBUNKED

...

YES BUT 99% OF THE WORLD WILL BE LOCKED OUT

GOOD BYE AUDIENCE

So what happens if politically incorrect statements become illegal content? Or discussing a taboo subject becomes illegal content?
Are you just going to give up on places like Sup Forums and never discuss important topics cause "illegal hate speech".

I don't like it either. but ted cruz is lying, again.

WHY DO I HAVE TO TYPE ALL CAPS TO GET PEOPLE TO UNDERSTAND THIS

THE FIRST AMENDMENT IS ONLY AN AMERICAN THING

THERE IS NO RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH WITHOUT COMPLETE CONTROL BY AMERICA AND THE BILL OF RIGHTS

the proposed model has no goverment influence over icann.
Ted Cruz's bill does.

this. NEVER TRUST RATO

YOU CANT CONTROL FB GOOGLE AND TWITTER MORE THAN THEY ALREADY DO

GO MAKE A POLITICALLY INCORRECT POST TO MORE THAN 100 PEOPLE ON JEWBOOK AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS

YOU GET BANNED

Not if un signs a contract.

PEOPLE ARE TOO BUSY JERKING OFF TO ANIME OR WORRIED ABOUT THE LAST SHIT HILLARY TOOK TO WORRY ABOUT SOMETHING AS TRIVIAL AS A FREE AND OPEN INTERNET.

A DNS server is not an independent server with all the possible IP routes

Soo, the US will no longer have a monopoly over domain names?

That's good.

>what are subdirectories?

Literally the way it's been done by universities since day one.

it doesn't have that anyway, the october 1st transition rejects all government regulation.

You are a complete moron that has no idea what you're talking about

Theyre owned by the owners. Theyre free to ban anyone they dont want.

The Internet works relatively fine, so why would Obama do something like this? If it's not broke don't fix it, right? Just by that logic this should sound slimy to anyone.

after all kek has done to cruz, He still protects kek

good job

youtube.com/watch?v=zMGZtkMS3sQ

>the proposed model has no goverment influence over icann.
THAT MEANS NO UNITED STATES BILL OF RIGHTS INFLUENCE OVER ICANN

THATS THE PROBLEM

WE NEED US CONTROL OVER THAT

INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS LIKE THE UN WILL BE ABLE TO VOTE ON WEBSITES TO BE SHUT DOWN

THEY WILL GO FOR FREE SPEECH FIRST

WHO ELSE HAS THE FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE UNITED STATES BILL OF RIGHTS?

if the U.S. Goverment directly takes control of the root zone dns like ted cruz's bill wants, then silcon valley can influence the internet.

Yes, but at the current moment you're free to start a website with any content you want, you can register any domain with any underlying content that you please with ICANN that you want because the constitution gives you that right

HES GOT TO WIN REELECTION SOMEHOW

Way better than the alternative

>UN
>no written laws

>the US is the country of freedum and we should pulice the whol wurld!

Fucking hell. How stupid are Americans? Don't you realize having these things regulated by a UNION OF NATIONS is better than it being monopolized by one single government with their single agenda? It means MORE freedom, not less.

>UN is the same organisation that seeks to uphold human rights such as free speech
>literally the first to ban free speech on the internet
topkek. i hate this planet sometimes

And if the UN (The Saudis and Israelis) take control that sounds fine too?

People dont get that freedom of speech is near dead on the net anyways.

Once it switches to whatever new model, expect censorships.

Still it can backfire on the left too, a political less net.

Cant see other countries be fine with transexuals and fag shit on the net and not being taken down.

the left wants to censor free speech, it's a very high priority now that they see the right is more influential than they want on here. network neutrality now this.. inb4 assblasted libturds le omg network neutrality so good the shills on reddit told me so

>trusting the (((UN)))
THEY DONT EVEN HAVE THE FIRST AMENDMENT

WHAT THE FUCK KIND OF SHILLING IS THIS???

Less freedom of speech will happen.

You will have a sterilized intenet.

That's not at all how any of this works, holy shit.

I'm sure communicating over SSL (HTTPS) connection (despite Google captcha knowing when you request/submit challenges) is less botnet than ZeroNet and I'll explain why.

Within a few minutes of installing ZeroNet I started messing around on zerochan. I noticed the locations the images were being stored and how they stayed the same for users between posts and threads.

On investigating this further I found that the folders also contained all the information about every post that user had made on the board along with every imagesubmitted, there is also a file that gives you their zeronet ID. I then loaded a few more sites to have a larger set of information to search and tried searching the zeronet ID using grep.

Sure enough it came up with information about a post by that user on another site. Now if that isn't enough, all this data is nicely sorted in JSON files that can be loaded by some database software to make it even easier to search.

Part of me wants to get out some old hard drives I have sitting around, dedicate a ton of storage space to this (I can do about 770 GB), and use the information to harass/dox posters. Given how the data is already setup to be used in a database it won't be hard to gather that information if the user posts it. ZeroNet is literally a botnet.

Here's a thought.
If Burgerfriends get banned from Sup Forums, we'll be locked in here with leafs and ausbongs..

WHY DO PEOPLE TRUST THE UN?

THEY ARE NOT HELD ACCOUNTABLE BY OR ELECTED BY ANYBODY

which is exactly why its makes no goddamn sense, the internet ended him campaign, why would he go any length to protect any of it.
ICANN is completely open to the public and takes the suggestions from them, and i think it will remain that way, you can't seriously tell me that governmental people were responsible for any well functioning part of the internet.

The majority of the UN are Euro/shitskin socialists that don't believe in freedom. Better to have it governed by one country with a proven track record of keeping the Internet free.

Won't give me the right once it's not American based anymore and Canada's own hate speech laws.

Yes idiot, whenever you register a domain with a third party, they need to be accredited by ICANN

It will backfire on the left too.

YOU CAN SAY ANYTHING LEGAL ON POL

FUCK OBAMA

FUCK CLINTON

FUCK MUSLIMS

FUCK JEWS

FUCK THE EU

Open internet is protected by the second amendment as well as the first

QUICK DAHNALD, LEND ME YOUR DELEGATES OR WE'RE ALL GOING TO DIE!

but they are transitioning into a model that has no government influence whatsoever and will reject it.

yes it will be bad for everyone

Rato was my second choice after Trump.