Is there a similar depth chart of right-wing ideologies?

Is there a similar depth chart of right-wing ideologies?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=dydG3ykQlvo
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

...

>tfw when youre transitioning from 3 to 4

I've never known such isolation

Facism is the biggest form of government before getting too corrupt. Traditionalism is small and useless

Nice dubs, one day you will see

GAS YOURSELF. I am tired of noodle arme little libertarian fags thinking they become radical right or traditionalist. You can NEVER be a traditionalist if, AT ANY POINT IN YOUR LIFE, you believed that if a medieval church is making less money than a shopping mall, the state can not intervene to protect the church.

...

Comfy at stage 3.

Trump is full blown 3.

In regards to

...

Bump

I didn't make the fucking picture lad.

>trump
>radical right - fascist
There are retards who believe this

There's loads of us user, read blogs like Ryan Landry or Brett Stevens

28sherman dot blogspot dot co dot uk
amerika dot org

posting the updated version

>not posting my superior Hoppe version

post it yourself

He has heavily implied that certain third world people bring third world problems. He is a nationalist at the core. He doesn't address problems with people on the premise of race solely, but on the premise of foreigners who don't want to adapt to American ethics and values. A mild 3.

I prefer the hoppe one tbqh, traditionalism is too edgy

I like this one as well.

5. Mainstream Democrat

Denbts bro just posted it.

Once you establish the legitimacy of government, a territorial monopolist on exploitation and property expropriation, you are defenseless against socialism and the ever growing expansion of power. No constitutions or special laws can prevent it from happening. Socialists are simply taking the logical conclusions of the classical liberals to its full extent. We must recognize the State as the cause for the complete degeneration of mankind and correct what classical liberals could not.

>egoism
>in a left-wing context
Explain. I consider myself an egoist, but I'm fairly right-wing, if you have to place me anywhere. I guess egoism and socialism / communism are not mutually exclusive, but whats your guys' take on this?

Stage 6 is realizing that it's the anglo all along, someone meme it into the picture.

Sitting somewhere between 8 and 9 atm.
Stage 3 all day long.

Articulated soldier for sure recently transitioned from disgruntled mensch

If you read up on reactionary thought it might start to bring you around. I used to be in the same position as you, but now I think that the destruction of the ego is necessary. It's a long road, though. Try someone like "reactionary future" (love that blog).

...

The mindset of seven, the exhaustion of six. At least I can ohp >1pl8

>tfw posted a quote from Society of the Spectacle on instagram

Even as a leftist I was a level 6 esoteric edgelord

> I used to be in the same position as you, but now I think that the destruction of the ego is necessary.
I'm vehemently against the destruction of the ego though. I asked how people think egoism and socialism / communism could coexist. If your post answered that, I completely fail to see it.

8, with hints of 9

I notice most of you fags are right libs, I'm far right authoritarian. What does that make me? Am I alone here? Would I be better off on stormfront?

>Stormfront
>ever

You might as well just call the FBI academy if you want to talk to agents that badly

Just go post in natsoc general

8, I can't go further because I'm black. But I want the preservation of the white western civilization!

8

Can anyone recommend books regarding the importance of inequality?

Probably a 7, with traits of 8 and 9.

>post-structuralism
fgt tier

Lots of libertarian bullshit

This is about right but I believe that 3 and 4 should be "either or" because honestly I would take either one much rather have fascism though.

level 8

By the way that version you guys have contains some typos. Here is a corrected version. I might make a new version with better and more relevant quotes soon

Tier 9. The only thing stopping me from ascending to God tier is my 5.5 inch dick. Oh man.

What does destruction of the ego even mean? Certainly not vegetative state brain damage?

7.5, which is where I estimate Trump to be, too.

Trying to move on from 6

Revolt Against the Modern World - Julius Evola

>hurr durr national socialism isn't the last stage becuase muh personal tie to traditionalism bias

>thinking the trajectory for western civilation has gone off course for only 200

>not saying since the roman pseudo-pacifist psyops religion took over rome and wrongfully forcefully converted the rest of europe to its bullshit

I believe it is most redpilled to go back to the ideals of the classical antiquity, to reach back to our ancestors and unshackle the bindings of the jewish rooted abrahamic religions and the subsequent tainted science/art/philosophy(not saying we didn't do or have these things, but the comon belief system of the time until now has really held us back). We must go back to what makes us european. The ancient romans, greeks and germanics all have things still to teach us today.

Also we must further invesitgate into pre ice age civilizations.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe, "Democracy--The God That Failed"

Not only he stresses the importance of inequality, he also advocates traditionalist and highly discriminatory societal organization based on biological and sociological facts. He even cites Jean Phillipe Rushton's "Race, Evolution and Behavior" several times on the footnotes. The absolute madman.

5 and a half here

I want to get off MR TRUMP'S WILD RIDE!

Bernie is not normal pleb tier. He's an unrepentant socialist and communist sympathizer literally gave props to Castro

>slimepunk will never be invented for me to listen to

Marxism is completely mainstream now

Egoism is left?

The destruction of the ego is the narrative that everything you know is a narrative, and that you do not exist separate from an existence that cannot be reduced to a story.
It starts with the story that the brain is a sense organ that senses itself, and can sense itself sensing itself. This sets up a recursion where any difference in senses can be sensed, and then that sense can be sensed and compared as well. The Ouroboros isn't a snake eating itself; it is a snake vomiting itself into existence.

The destruction of the ego is a long process of enlightenment where you tell the story of the story, and see that the whole of what you know is just the narrative.

You cannot know the world, but the world will tell you if the story is useful to be believed by stopping the story when it is no longer useful to be believed.

Unfortunately the Meta-Narrative (the story of the story) says you have been programmed to confuse your story with the world, and to look at the world as static and not the result of a recursion. You also have many brains that use emotion and instinct and inference in different ways to persuade yourself and others that your story is right.

But the story is always constrained by its intent. The intent of the story (mostly survival) filters and add narrative objects to the story that cannot possibly be shown to be useful to be believed (unfalisfiables). We tie ourselves into a mares nest of conflicting narratives until we grasp at one story and ignore the parts that stop.

One becomes blue pilled just like absolutely everyone on this board, and you live in your stories and ignore the world and make up stupid charts of your foolishness.

*sniff"

Also, the jews have had a subversive/dominant position for over a thousand years now, thanks to the french king who said only jews could deal in usury with interests, while christians could not.

Very interstingly, you could not be anything else besides christian after you were born into it during 800ad-1700, or you would have been forever shunned or killed. So jews already had completely binded europeans financially, they were all stuck in a catch 22 without any kind of options, except if you were rich or nobility of course. But all peasantry were forced to follow all bullshit from their religion and could never utter a word or choose something else out of fear of death.

So it rejects an external material reality in favor of a bunch of narratives? Like the hippies that say "all is mind"?

Sounds like a bunch of sophistry and word games desu.

I'm Libertarian for the sole fact that most American tax money is wasted on stupid shit

>thinking the trajectory for western civilization has gone off course for only 200

Traditionalists like Evola believe that Western Civilization has been decaying for thousands of years. The French Revolution, however, is seen as a tipping point of acceleration.

You couldn't really say it's gone "off course" though, as the degeneration is an inevitable part of a civilization's life cycle.

I think you are wrong. Civilization only decays with the decline of the steadfast and vigilance of good men. That can always be revitalized but it takes effort.

Steadfastness*

Almost 9.

Have to kick smoking and restrain my drinking habit. Cloud also use a little exercise.

This except it's masked as "social democracy"

This is probably the best chart I've ever seen on Sup Forums pertaining to this kind of stuff.

Also an 8 for sure but I am also learning French and Russian so I am getting close to 9

>11
>NOFAP for 10 years achieved: the Universe is your playground now

10, but I'm not white so that puts me at a solid 11.

Level 7

Family and friends distancing themselves was pretty difficult

Did you put a filter to filter the flouride in the water?

Fuck me, man. Pol made me jump that shit to 9

better version

level 7 here

That's a common misunderstanding. It is a recursion between the process of creating the narrative, and a world that tells you whether the narrative is stupid.
You have many simultaneous pathways you traverse in the brain to make your currrent narrative that you are unaware is going on because there is nothing to stop it.

Remove something in your world, and you notice. Fail at something you expect and you notice.
It is the mistake of sophistry to think you make your world. You make your narrative. Your narrative is not your world. You can't know your world, but you can know your narrative and the two are inseparable in your mind.

But that is the problem. We all have different narratives, and narratives being recursions are always changing. We cannot, therefore, ever agree on everything.

It then becomes a question of persuasion..
That is this board in a nutshell.

Does this qualify as obscure music?
>youtube.com/watch?v=dydG3ykQlvo
Unknown cartel-rap music